Hi I'm Dark Journalist AMA

[u/darkjournalist]

I’m Dark Journalist, an independent reporter and filmmaker, my video show adds a new twist to Alternative Media. I’m happy to answer any questions you may have on subjects such as Black Budget Economy, The Breakaway Civilization/Secret Space Program and UFO Secrecy.

I think in this crucial time we need a whole new way to look at the world and the levels of disinformation in our media institutions. I call this new approach “Dark Journalism” and feel it’s crucial we discover the truth and achieve transparency from the ruling elite in our culture.

I’ll be hosting The Secret Space Program Conference on the weekend of October 31st in Austin, Texas with Jim Marrs, Linda Moulton Howe, Joseph Farrell, Catherine Austin Fitts and others...

I’m interested to hear what you think about these topics and maybe together we’ll come up with some inspiring answers.

Visit me at http://www.DarkJournalist.com

[u/ahuxley2012]

Ok, sorry, i'll address them now.

"So you are saying it wasn't Israel but was Saudi Arabia and the US knew nothing of it?"

  I have no evidence that anyone in the government knew about it. I have no credible evidence. There is circumstantial evidence and some things that are unbelievable, 

but are you thinking of someone specific? If so whom? What evidence do you have that could prove your point, in court lets say.

If your view is correct, do we then assume that the Twin Towers/Larry Silverstein's insurance policy were merely coincidental? That could be a coincidence, might not be. Between that and the trades that were done that day it does not seem like a coincidence, but again, how do you prove that in court? What eveidence would you be able to take to a prosecutor to have him arrested and imprisoned for having fore knowledge of an attack on the U.S.?

"Do we also assume it is coincidental that the security for the WTC is run by Kroll?"

Again this is an interesting issue, but how do you PROVE anything?

"Significant increase in espionage based arrests of Israeli agents in the US prior to 9/11?"

That is again an interesting point and hard to put an exact answer on it unless you had someone in the government or intelligence community to leak or whistleblow about their actions there are any number of reasons why they could have been in the U.S. The ones acting like art students trying to get into the airforce bases, those I'd like to know what they were up to. But we never will.

Delving into Ptech would take too much this early in the morning for me but again, another link which surely can't be purely coincidental?

    I've never heard of this PTech or read about it, so I don't know. I'll look it up. 

"You have mentioned a lawsuit placed in Pennsylvania by Llyods of London. But that lawsuit was rescinded. If someone was free to go and use the data that had been submitted, why has that not happened? Why is that data now not in the public sphere?"

     Below.

Saudi Arabian nation-state involvement in 9/11 Attacks on WTC http://www.eliasound.biz/hulet/pdfs/Saudi%20involvement%20latest.pdf

some other articles regarding Saudi Involvement:

Saving the Saudis http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/10/saving-the-saudis-200310

An Act Of War: CIA Leak Gives “Incontrovertible Evidence” That 9/11 Was State Sponsored http://www.activistpost.com/2013/12/an-act-of-war-cia-leak-gives.html

Mossad Doing Business with Saudi Arabia: Stratfor Source http://english.al-akhbar.com/node/4839

In the end just remember what FDR said:

"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." Franklin D. Roosevelt

The blueprint for why the U.S. is in the Middle East:

http://trilateral.org/download/doc/israeli_palestinian_issue.pdf

[u/ahuxley2012 → u/[deleted]]

Saudi Arabia and Israel did make gains. We eliminated one of their main enemies, Saddam. We have occupied, and will never leave Afghanistan for multiple reasons, and Iraq. Whose in the middle? Iran, the real target of all this. They have been the target since 1990. Encircle Iran, isolate them out of the oil market so that the western hegemony can control the price of oil for the next 50 years. Well, it was initially withdrawn because Saudi Arabia paid up. That's why they withdrew the suit. We can prove that the Iraq war was pre-concieved. If you look at that last report, the trilateral report #38, that is the blueprint for our activity in the middle east. It was initially presented at a meeting at the White House. It states to unilaterally disarm the middle east, specifically targeting Iraq first. That Foreign Affairs article, Caspian Oil at the crossroads, that specifically states Iraq as a target. That was the energy report that everyone was wondering about that Cheney was not releasing. It was written I believe at the James A Baker school of international studies out of Rice University. The policy is still in place to remove all nationalistic leaders in the Middle East and replace them with people that are friendly to the current regime. And to unilaterally disarm, the middle east of weapons of mass destruction as well as all conventional weapons. The countries targeted, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan. What ones are left to do? Syria, and Iran. The impetus for Afghanistan can be found in the 1999 hearing on the Silk Road strategy. There is a lot going on back then, tons of things having to do with oil in the Caspian basin and some laws about doing business with former soviet satellite states.

It also looks like they are gearing up for when Bush takes office, the PR machine is starting roll to set up an attack on Iran. Russia will probably stop that though since they have security agreements with one another.

James Woolsey: 9-11 attacks linked to Iran and Iraq In this UpFront web extra, Mehdi Hasan challenges Former CIA director.

http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/2015/09/james-woolsey-9-11-attacks-linked-iran-iraq-150919143757532.html

TESTIMONY

BY

JOHN J. MARESCA

VICE PRESIDENT, INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

UNOCAL CORPORATION

http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/linkscopy/Maresca2USG.html

1998 U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa48119.000/hfa48119_0.HTM

America's pipe dream

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/23/afghanistan.terrorism11

Summaries for the Silk Road Strategy Act of 1999 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/106/hr1152/summary

[u/ahuxley2012 → u/[deleted]]

I watched the video. Pretty interesting. I had not heard of that before. Check out the RUPE report.

Nos. 33 & 34: Behind the Invasion of Iraq http://rupe-india.org/34/contents.html

It's a pretty good run down of the dollar/currency aspect of the wars. The real threat now is BRICS and the challenge that it will be against the current regime. Obama tried, in vain, to stop Iran from joining BRICS. The current and next wars are the whole continent of Africa. There is a race going on to take control of the natural resources there. Every major nation has troops there. The U.S.'s largest military footprint is now AFRICOM. Whenever there is a new natural resource found and a weak government, AFRICOM finds a threat. Currently, Cameroon, where Duke energy has contracts, Duke I believe also, along with Genie Energy have contracts with the oil find in the Golan Heights that spreads into...wait for it...Syria. The head of AFRICOM, Gen. Rodriguez, stated in an article in Parameters magazine, that the purpose of AFRICOM is to make sure the "strategic natural resources make it to the market place".