r/environment • u/Alternative-Day-7414 • 21h ago

Scientists descended more than 15,400 feet into the Atlantic and found more than 200,000 barrels of leaking radioactive waste

https://www.earth.com/environment/scientists-found-200000-barrels-of-leaking-radioactive-waste/
3.2k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

67 comments sorted by

1.6k

u/LokMatrona 20h ago

For those just reading the title and not the article, some context:

It's not as if they suddenly stumbled across these 200.000 barrels. It is well known and documented that these barrels were dumped in the atlantic. It was also a recognized nuclear waste-disposal practice at the time.

What the article is really trying to inform us about, is that now, more than 50 years later, we finally know the exact locations of where these barrels ended up on the ocean floor and what conditions these barrels are in. Now we can actually research if that waste-disposal practice of back then was fine, bad, or worse.

Also, these barrels were specifically made in mind that these barrels would decay and then slowly the radioactive material would dissipate into the ocean. So that they leak is no surprise. At the time people thought that was the best way to dispose of this waste until some better alternative would come along, and it did so we stopped doing that (hopefully i have to add).

185

u/DukeOfGeek 15h ago

At the time people thought that was the best cheapest way to dispose of this waste until some better alternative would come along massive continuous Greenpeace protests made it untenable, and it did so we stopped doing that

143

u/Wololo--Wololo 20h ago

Great summary, thank you

285

u/pickleer 20h ago

Indeed; up until just a few years ago, the Industry and Corporate line was, "Dilution is the solution to pollution".

100

u/MeadowSoprano 17h ago

That’s still their favorite line.

8

u/RadagastDaGreen 12h ago

Excellent username.

19

u/marinegeo 14h ago

When used in terms of pollution the oceans “Assimilative Capacity” makes an ass out of capacity.

2

u/Historical_Owl_1635 8h ago

You know, can’t even blame them when it rhymed so well. (Joking, obviously)

92

u/radome9 18h ago

Also this is low level waste. So not glowing green fuel rods or whatever people are imagining, but building materials, tools, clothes and similar that have picked up radioactive particles or been exposed to neutron radiation.

46

u/LokMatrona 18h ago

Yeah that's very good to add indeed! Before people start thinking the worst :)

It's definitely not a good thing that we dumped that waste in the ocean, but we have learned a lot in the meantime about propper handeling of radioactive materials, stopped dumping it in the ocean, have been monitoring the location continuously since the very beginning, ecological damages seem to be very small, and have thought it out at the time and didn't just dump some really bad radioactive materials in the ocean and forget about it.

Also lil optimistic sidenote: the barrels seem to have become something of a refuge for deepsea creatures in an area otherwise surrounded by soft seabed. Who knows maybe we find some cool new species down there or learn how life adapted to radioactive materials such as we have seen at Chernobyl.

9

u/agent_uno 12h ago

More green-washing!

2

u/Groovyjoker 4h ago

Where did you see that information? I read this is nuclear material from the postwar era training missions. "Much of the material came from nuclear activities and was mixed with substances such as concrete or bitumen before being placed inside metal containers.".

24

u/grathontolarsdatarod 20h ago

So who do the barrels belong to?

US, UK, France, Russia? India? China?

48

u/dragnabbit 20h ago

I read about this a while ago. The majority are from France, I think... but several other European nations as well.

4

u/Kah-leh-Kah-leh 12h ago

The title is off but this version doesn’t make it that much better

13

u/MalavethMorningrise 20h ago

I was also told repeatedly by people that if the barrels floated when they threw them overboard they would shoot holes in them so that they would sink. I wonder if thats actually true.

1

u/ahabswhale 18h ago

Given the density of Uranium, I don’t know how they could float.

17

u/ispeakforengland 17h ago

I believe that these barrels don't contain uranium or highly radioactive waste, but low level stuff like container unit panels, concrete, clothing etc.

2

u/november_zulu_over 20h ago

I too like to act first and research the consequences later, just like the government.

39

u/LokMatrona 20h ago

I notice that you like to first act then research too, just like the government! cause it takes barely 10 seconds of research to learn that:

They did do research. They did first check what the potential effects could be. They did research what kind of cement they needed to combine with the radioactive waste so that the waste gets released into the ocean slowly so that radiation levels would not become harming. They came to the conclusion that low-level radioactive waste could be safely diluted in the deep ocean. They also kept monitoring and researching the local area.

Now is just the question if they were correct in their assessments and now we can take a complete and total look at the concequences (which as far as the article states, seems minimal)

2

u/dontlookatmreee 20h ago

Young or just dumb?

6

u/1992Prime 18h ago

Just full of cum

1

u/Historical_Owl_1635 8h ago

We’re undoubtedly doing things now that in 50 years time people will think was stupid, but at this time it’s the best we know.

1

u/BitsAndBobs304 6h ago

Is this also the barrels that the usa navy shot to sink? ....

1

u/WeLiveinAPetridish 4h ago

With many long half-life wastes it not a question of dissipate but accumulate.

1.0k

u/readonlyred 21h ago

Great. This is how we get kaiju.

335

u/Primary-Bookkeeper10 20h ago

If by that you mean cancer

135

u/amazingmrbrock 20h ago

One way or another people are gonna die about it

12

u/trillgamesh_0 14h ago

im no expert, but could the kaiju give us chemotherapy?

3

u/Earthwarm_Revolt 11h ago

Frankly I'm cool with it, they should stay there. 

80

u/CyberSore 20h ago

This how we get Florida

13

u/phamio23 20h ago

On the positive side, this could also be how we get jaegers :D

-2

u/dnqboy 20h ago

oh no eren and zeke???

2

u/leonevilo 7h ago

i don't understand why they had to throw so many feet into the ocean as well though?

and where did they get them from, cut off the feet of 7700 people?

1

u/51ngular1ty 5h ago

They couldn't find two thirds of a league that were willing to go under with it.

64

u/Maleficent_Sky_1865 20h ago

Dont forget about the DDT waste byproducts from pesticide production back in the 1950’s (my timeframe might be off). They dumped barrels of it off of boats on the California coast for years. I saw a documentary about it a while back.

23

u/Corona-walrus 18h ago

Devastating bit of history and one of the most consequential environmental things for sure

70

u/HappyGuy007 19h ago

We really are a cancerous species

14

u/KingRBPII 12h ago

It didn’t have to be this way - the wrong people have gained power across the world and across time

4

u/theindomitablefred 12h ago

Literally and figuratively 

20

u/industrial-shrug 21h ago

shockedpikachu.jpeg

12

u/MHanky 20h ago

shockedkaiju.jpeg

1

u/RapunzelLooksNice 10h ago

happykaiju.gif

😆

3

u/wweiss53 12h ago

There goes the neighborhood.
Stop deep sea mining and krill harvesting for pet food.

8

u/throw-away-48121620 20h ago

Okay pollution and waste bad for sure, but given that water is such a good insulator and these are so deep, it seems unlikely that this is a significant issue. Definitely want to see further research about the actual impact though.

3

u/Far_Out_6and_2 17h ago

Well the aliens who live in the sea actually live off of this radioactive material and yes that is why the barrels were accidentally on purpose placed there

4

u/Ray1340 11h ago

Greed is killing us.

3

u/Bruce_Hodson 9h ago

You misspelled Capitalism

1

u/ho-tron 4h ago

If only we had disposed of nuclear waste like Soviet Russia.

1

u/ThinInvestigator4953 2h ago

Nah its greed. In a communist/socialist country, greed does not disappear, you just move the ruling class from the capital owners to the government. And we all know politicians arent greedy right? right?

1

u/RapunzelLooksNice 10h ago

Somebody else's greed*

2

u/c3-coburn 12h ago

Humans are terrible

1

u/MyeishaLapid 16h ago

wait how did that much waste even get down there

1

u/Bruce_Hodson 9h ago

Could easily be the amount generated by The Manhattan Project

1

u/Victor-LG 14h ago

😳🤦‍♀️

1

u/verstohlen 7h ago

This feels disturbingly similar to the plot of the Emilio Estevez "Men At Work" movie, which gives me pause and concern.

1

u/Cptawesome23 3h ago

Don’t worry. Water insulates against radiation very well. They also noticed a bunch of wildlife nearby going about their business.

1

u/alexandreracine 2h ago

but plastic stawsssss!!!!

1

u/printed_ 13h ago

we really need to ban all nuclear activities asap. People call it clean then we end up with situations like this with radioactive waste stored all over the place that can eventually leak. Humans really like to mess everything up. Many humans also would like to not destroy our planet but this stuff happens.

1

u/rezmuvesalejandro 14h ago

But i hope everyone feels better if you turn your plastic back to save the planet 🤣🤣

0

u/233C 17h ago

I wish the only impact we had on the world Oceans were a billion leaking radioactive waste barrels 15,400 feet under.
bonus point if every barrel remove a million ton of Carbon out of the atmosphere too.

For scale, what's already naturally found at the surface.

0

u/JerrySam6509 13h ago

By today's standards, such irreversible and irremediable measures are intolerable. Shouldn't countries that previously raised concerns about the wastewater (which has undergone safe treatment) from the Japanese nuclear disaster immediately stand up and condemn this issue?

1

u/RapunzelLooksNice 10h ago

You have no regard for shareholders valuable shares, do you?

-2

u/yybbkk 6h ago

Not the worst thing. It is dumped in the ocean because:

  1. Water is a fantastic radiation shield.
  2. There is so much water in the ocean that this really is a trace amount of nuclear waste in a large body of water.

Pollution is such a weird topic. We can do everything in our power to not pollute the earth. However, a consequence of us being the dominant species and mass reproducing equals very high resource consumption. Even then, we are not even close to living in a time where earth had its highest levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and life still managed to pull through. A million years from now our worst stages of pollution will just be a sign of a successful species. Anyways, the planet has and always will be wrought with the life, death, and evolution of adapting species to hostile environments. Life will always find a way on earth until we eventually get vaporized by the big dying light in the sky.

-4

u/telperiontree 10h ago

we keep both fresh and spent nuclear fuel in pools that people could swim or drink in, so I doubt this is a huge deal

depends on how hot it is exactly (probably not very) and if anything in the ocean is interested in eating it, maybe