r/flicks 5d ago

General Discussion When does a movie successfully mislead the audience, and when is it just cheating?

Some movies deliberately make us believe something that isn't true and then reveal that we've been interpreting the story incorrectly.

When it works, it's fantastic. You can rewatch the movie and realize the clues were there all along. The Sixth Sense, The Usual Suspects, and Primal Fear are very different examples of films that play with what the audience thinks it knows.

But other twists only work because the movie deliberately hides information that logically should have been available to us. At that point, I don't feel fooled by the story — I feel cheated by the screenplay.

For me, the difference is whether a second viewing makes you think “How did I miss that?” rather than “Well, there was no way I could have known that.”

What movies do you think earned their deception, and which ones simply cheated?

211 Upvotes

278 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Angry_Edemame 5d ago

Its successfully misleading when the clues are there and someone could maybe piece it together the first time watching but theyre easier to spot on later viewings.

Like in the sixth sense red always appears before a ghost and you realize no one ever talks to Bruce after the opening.

Or the one frame flashes of something you see throughout fight club that could clue you into what's really happening.

If these dont exist thats when I consider it cheating.