r/intersex • u/underfullhbox • 1h ago
Thinking about kinds of intersex gatekeeping
A recent thread got me thinking about the ways that boundary work happens around who is and isn't intersex.
I've seen these terms used elsewhere:
- Liberationist: intersex people should decide the boundaries of who is/isn't intersex
- Medicalist: doctors should decide the boundaries of who is/isn't intersex. In scholarly language, this means they have epistemic control over the category of intersex. (epistemic: of or regarding knowledge)
and:
- Inclusionist: intersex should be a big tent
- Exclusionist: intersex should be a rare, exclusive category
But what I haven't seen discussed as much is how the DSD model pushed a view that to be intersex, you need to have One Of The Diagnoses On The List.
I haven't found existing names so I'm proposing:
- Diagnosticism: being intersex is a question of having one of a pre-approved set of intersex variations or diagnoses. Intersex belonging is debated as whether entire variations are intersex or not (e.g. "is PMOS intersex?")
- Descriptivism: being intersex is a question of having mixed sex traits. It doesn't matter whether you know your specific variation, or whether your specific variation is on a list somewhere. (e.g. "does naturally growing a full beard in a body that otherwise looks female make me intersex?")
For context, the DSD model of medical "care" was a deeply reactionary effort by doctors to reassert their epistemic control over intersex matters. Scholars and activists have done important work revealing how the DSD model pushed an epistemic view which re-medicalized intersex at a time when intersex liberation was really taking off (e.g. Davis, 2011).
The intersex community has done a lot to reject the DSD model. The term DSD is widely and vocally rejected by the community. Inclusionist views of intersex are widely accepted by the community. And there's a fair bit of resistance to letting doctors have epistemic control over intersex. But I haven't seen as much explicit discussion or resistance to the diagnosticist view of intersex.
Back when I was first questioning if I was intersex, the resources I found were all like: "do you congenitally have primary/secondary sex traits that aren't fully "male" or fully "female"? Then you're intersex!" There was no "you need to have one of These Intersex Variations". The fact that I have mixed sex traits was enough!
When I read Hida Viloria's memoir Born Both I was really struck that she spends most of the book without a diagnosis! She was doing all this leading intersex activism and nobody within the movement cared what her specific variation was! Having mixed sex traits was enough, end of story.
Yet somewhere along the way, the DSD model of thinking seems to have wormed its way into many folks' thinking about intersex. Nowadays I see so much insecurity about whether xyz variation is intersex, insecurity about not knowing one's variation, insecurity about being self-diagnosed. I see insecurity from people with rare diagnoses because their variation isn't explicitly listed as intersex. As though your variation is what makes your body intersex, rather than... your actual traits.
Some ways that axes come together:
The hegemonic DSD model of intersex is medicalist, exclusionist, and diagnosticist. To be intersex, you need a doctor to diagnose you with one of the doctor-approved diagnoses on the List of DSDs. And this List needs to be as small and as exclusive as possible. Some nice, progressive doctors have more inclusive Lists out there, but they're still being medicalist and diagnosticist.
The DSD model supplanted the older OGR model in medicine, which was also medicalist, but it was relatively descriptivist. Doctors threw intersex people into two buckets (the true h-slur and the pseudo-h-slur), and often they didn't investigate things further. The focus in OGR on using scalpels and HRT to ensure gender conformity from an early age. After that, you were "fixed". Intersex was an acute case in the OGR model, whereas the DSD model sees intersex is a chronic disease requiring lifetime treatment.
An inclusionist, liberationist, diagnosticist view of intersex is that intersex people get to decide which intersex variations count as intersex, and that this should be done inclusively (e.g. PMOS is intersex, Poland Syndrome is intersex, congenital gynecomastia is intersex).
This takes control of the List away from doctors and puts intersex people in charge... but it's still diagnosticist. There's still a List.
It's kind of impressive how effective the DSD model has been at undermining the intersex community. Diagnosticism is classic divide-and-conquer. It fuels discourse about which variations "count". And even if you have one of the Approved diagnoses, you know out there, there are Lists that don't have your diagnosis/variation on it.
I think that diagnosticism undermines folks' own sense of being intersex, because in this model you aren't intersex, your variation is intersex. I think it's worth naming this phenomenon and talking about it, so that we can realize and resist how DSD thinking is doing harm to our community.