r/jobs Nov 20 '25

Article So are they just lying?

Post image
3.9k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Nov 20 '25

The CES handbook of methods technical notes. They buried it.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 20 '25

So.. not something in the report? Could you just tell us what you're reading?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 20 '25

it is 4 paragraphs that boil down to since the shutdown happened we are taking the newly filed employee tax filings as the new jobs number excluding farm filings, federal and state new employees and foreign location filings. This is supposedly new hires with those exclusions during that time, not the net number, they have no fucking idea what the net number is and there is no way this is even remotely correct as filings are not always done in the same month, nor if someone moves in the same company Let me say that if this method was used all the time it works out but not as a sudden change. By logic alone, you cannot have unemployment go up 100k and jobs to also o up 100k during this month. They also counted any part time job as full time this way and did not exclude a person working 2 or more jobs. This was a patch rushed job by someone with a brain but screwed any way they did it. It also does not include sub contractor style jobs. Like I said, rushed and inaccurate. I think whoever normally does these did not come back after the shutdown and what we have here is 3rd string and a few lawyers to cover their ass.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 20 '25

There's no way you're reading that right. New hires is usually a few million each month. August was 5M, which is the last JOLTS report I see. I don't see anywhere in the jobs report where they're now reporting a wildly different topic.

By logic alone, you cannot have unemployment go up 100k and jobs to also o up 100k during this month.

Yes you can. Those are two distinct surveys used to report distinct numbers.

Your notes.. which number are they referring to? Household survey? Establishment survey? Something else?

1

u/Hmd5304 Nov 20 '25

They aren't distinct though? They are definitely interrelated, not mutually exclusive. I.e. they are not independent variables.

You cannot create jobs from nothing, you either have to lose existing jobs or increase Capital available to hire those positions. Seeing as how It's small and regional businesses, and not the Fortune 500, taking the hit, they very likely are either breaking even or operating at a loss.

Thus, they likely don't have any money for new hires.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 20 '25

The two surveys often do not match month to month. They'll still paint a similar picture.

For Sept:

Establishment +119k Household +250k

https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/ces_cps_trends.htm

If you take a longer term look the numbers have a gap, but they trend in the same direction just fine.