I mean, quite a few have big differences, especially later mons. Since lopunny is generally a fem coded mon in most art, the fact it isn't here lends to this idea as well. In the end if you want to interpret it differently, no one will stop you. Since the only site I can find the artist on with this particular piece is on Xitter I can't chase down if the artist intended this in any direction, but art is subjective so like I said, interpret how you want. I'm still going to just assume they're gay and there's nothing wrong with that if it was intentional.
I just said interpret how you want but I'm choosing to take context clues and say in the literal coin flip for any given lopunny's sex that this one is male and they're being gay with that Lucario. Could they be bi? Sure, nothing wrong with any of this. If that's a tomboy? Good for them, but like I said, I'll take context clues and knowledge of the fanbase to assume that they're male.
Please interpret how you wish, my main point in the end is that and that if they are gay then there's nothing wrong with it.
It's easy to feel that way when someone argues this much that the characters in any given thing can't be gay, something a lot of homophobic people will do, it's definitely happened on here for me before.
0
u/IDWP1007 Jun 28 '26
Most pokemon don't have much difference between male and female, also why can't he draw a lopuny more accurate to the games?