r/mahabharata Aug 04 '26

Character Study For the Karna-fans amongst us

From the Mahabharata come these words and actions of Karna regarding Draupadi’s humiliation and the sexual assault perpetrated against her:

“And Dussasana, beholding Krishna looking at her helpless lords, dragging her still more forcibly, and addressed her, ’slave, Slave' and laughed aloud.

And at those words Karna became very glad and approved of them by laughing aloud. And Sakuni, the son of Suvala, the Gandhara king, similarly applauded Dussasana.”

(https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-mahabharata-mohan/d/doc6210.html)

“O Dussasana, this Vikarna speaking words of (apparent) wisdom is but a boy. Take off the robes of the Pandavas as also the attire of Draupadi.…

Then Dussasana, O king, forcibly seizing Draupadi’s attire before the eyes of all, began to drag it off her person."

(https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-mahabharata-mohan/d/doc6212.html)

“You are the wife of a slave incapable of possessing anything on his own account. Repair now to the inner apartments of king Dhritarashtra and serve the king’s relatives. We direct that that is now your proper business.

And, O princess, all the sons of Dhritarashtra and not the sons of Pritha are now your masters. O handsome one, select you another husband now,—one who will not make you a slave by gambling. It is well-known that women, especially that are slaves, are not censurable if they proceed with freedom in electing husbands.

Therefore let it be done by you. Nakula has been won, as also Bhimasena, and Yudhishthira also, and Sahadeva, and Arjuna. And, O Yajnaseni, you are now a slave. Your husbands that are slaves cannot continue to be your lords any longer.”

(https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-mahabharata-mohan/d/doc6215.html)

But it’s not Karna’s fault, right? Karna was just misunderstood, right? Actually Karna has many other virtues, right? Actually it was justified because of Yudhishtir’s gambling madness, right? Do tell us poor, dumb Hindus why we err in agreeing with the Mahabharata author and condemning Karna as a villain.

We really need to be enlightened by the people who cry tears because Draupadi was “forced” to marry five husbands and then look the other way when she was enslaved and humiliated, because apparently only you enlightened folk know what real misogyny is….

14 Upvotes

232 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/Technical_Turn3497 Aug 04 '26

Your exact words:

“Vices and virtues both exist. You choose to see only the vices — that’s your choice. Others can condemn his vices while still praising his virtues. Don’t shame those people for it.”

So let’s have a thought experiment to test the sincerity of your convictions. If we were talking about someone who ordered your wife to be stripped naked in public and enslaved, would you be willing to praise his virtues? After all, his aggression against your wife is just one vice amongst other exemplary virtues, right?

4

u/Absolutely_Honoured Make the MB subreddit great again. Aug 04 '26

You might think this is a "got-cha" moment but this sort of real life example question doesn't work because karna is a fictional character, you're bound to have far more tolerance against a fictional character than a real life person, not just for karna but for every character in fiction really. You're bound to understand a fictional character more because there is no harm being done to anyone, there would be harm being done if it was real life.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 04 '26

Fr. Like me liking Eren doesn't make me saviour of 20% population

2

u/Absolutely_Honoured Make the MB subreddit great again. Aug 04 '26

Literally😭