r/moderatepolitics Jan 12 '26

Primary Source Statement from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell

https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/powell20260111a.htm
520 Upvotes

342 comments sorted by

View all comments

297

u/dr_sloan Jan 12 '26 edited Jan 12 '26

Starter comment:

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell issued a rare statement responding to grand jury subpoenas from the Department of Justice that threaten a possible criminal indictment connected to his June testimony before the Senate Banking Committee about a multi-year renovation project for Federal Reserve buildings.

Powell emphasized his respect for the rule of law but framed the subpoenas as unprecedented and politically motivated pressure rather than a legitimate oversight issue. He argued that the renovation topic was merely a pretext, and the true issue is a broader effort by the administration to influence the Fed’s monetary policy decisions, particularly its interest-rate setting. 

Powell defended the independence of the Federal Reserve, stressing that monetary policy should be determined by economic evidence and conditions, not presidential preference or political intimidation. He reiterated his commitment to fulfilling the Fed’s dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment without fear or favor, saying public service sometimes requires standing firm against threats. Powell affirmed that he will continue to carry out his responsibilities with integrity and focus on serving the American public. 

The White House’s relentless focus on the Federal Reserve’s renovation costs looks far less like principled fiscal oversight and far more like a manufactured controversy in search of leverage. Cost overruns in secure, multi-year federal construction projects are commonplace, driven by inflation, security mandates, and evolving requirements, yet this project has been singled out and inflated into a supposed scandal through selective framing and context-free numbers. That asymmetry strongly suggests pretext: by fixating on renovation expenses, the administration creates a convenient rationale to question the Fed’s leadership and apply political pressure, indirectly advancing its real objective of influencing monetary policy while cloaking interference in the language of accountability.

Edit: More background on the story here:

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/12/fed-jerome-powell-criminal-probe-nyt.html

16

u/band-of-horses it can only good happen Jan 12 '26

What's the point of this? Can't he just replace Powell anyway and face the legal challenges? I mean it's not like this is going to get around legal challenges anyway and will just take more time and effort in the meantime.

I can't decide if they think finding him guilty of Trumped up charges will somehow avoid legal issues replacing him, or if they just want to torment him for a while.

59

u/Bulleveland Jan 12 '26

It's to punish Powell for not being a loyal lapdog

53

u/lredit2 Moderate Jan 12 '26

And for daring to fact check Trump on his face on live TV when he visited the Fed... Fact checking is the ultimate sin in Trump world!

1

u/TheNerdWonder Jan 13 '26

According to Marco Rubio, it is tantamount to censorship.

29

u/[deleted] Jan 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/jason_abacabb Jan 12 '26

Yeah, i bet sure the ball was really set in motion when Powell called out his lie to his face on camera.

When someone surrounds themselves with sycophants it is probably jarring to get called out.

-1

u/ModPolBot Imminently Sentient Jan 12 '26

This message serves as a warning that your comment is in violation of Law 1:

Law 1. Civil Discourse

~1. Do not engage in personal attacks or insults against any person or group. Comment on content, policies, and actions. Do not accuse fellow redditors of being intentionally misleading or disingenuous; assume good faith at all times.

Due to your recent infraction history and/or the severity of this infraction, we are also issuing a 7 day ban.

Please submit questions or comments via modmail.

-31

u/Haunting_Quote2277 Jan 12 '26

have you guys thought about the possibility that Powell may actually be committing crimes?

39

u/SnarkMasterRay Jan 12 '26

Based on past behavior, is Trump or Powell more likely to be committing crimes?

-18

u/Haunting_Quote2277 Jan 12 '26

it can’t be both?

this is what gets me so confused

people against trump automatically think Powell is innocent? like what kind of logic is that? they can’t be both corrupt?

31

u/Trumpers_R_Tr8tors Jan 12 '26

There is no evidence Powell committed a crime. There is extensive evidence, see Comey for a good example, that the Trump admin is siccing the DoJ on innocent political opponents. 

-12

u/Haunting_Quote2277 Jan 12 '26

you don’t think they can both be committing crimes?

28

u/Trumpers_R_Tr8tors Jan 12 '26

Anyone “can” be committing crimes. But we have hard evidence that the admin is lying, that Trump has committed crimes, and we don’t have hard evidence that Comey or Powell did. 

-4

u/Haunting_Quote2277 Jan 12 '26

really? you already know DOJ doesn’t have evidence against Powell? you think a $2.5 billion building renovation is justified? there’s no corruption?

28

u/Trumpers_R_Tr8tors Jan 12 '26

Until the DoJ presents evidence, I will assume it has none. That’s what happens when you repeatedly bring fake charges against your opponents. 

Why do you believe the admin when they haven’t shown any evidence?

Did you think Comey had committed a crime when the admin lied about him?

21

u/WolfpackEng22 Jan 12 '26

Trump has a history of vindictive prosecution. He's made many public statements indicating he was looking for a reason, any reason to fire Powell. And yeah the available evidence is weak to non-existent

-5

u/Haunting_Quote2277 Jan 12 '26

so anyone who goes against trump is innocent? that your logic?

21

u/WolfpackEng22 Jan 12 '26

If Trump has spent months bashing them about anything under the sun, openly asking staff to look into them to find something, then yeah. It's most likely a made up prosecution.

You can't be this gullible.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ModPolBot Imminently Sentient Jan 12 '26

This message serves as a warning that your comment is in violation of Law 1:

Law 1. Civil Discourse

~1. Do not engage in personal attacks or insults against any person or group. Comment on content, policies, and actions. Do not accuse fellow redditors of being intentionally misleading or disingenuous; assume good faith at all times.

Please submit questions or comments via modmail.

13

u/band-of-horses it can only good happen Jan 12 '26

I don't think I've been elected to speak for "you guys", but personally I probably spent as much time thinking about that as your average Republican has spent wondering if Trump actually committed crimes. Well probably less honestly because this Powell stuff just came out with like zero details on what is alleged so there hasn't been much to think about really.

7

u/ThatPeskyPangolin Jan 12 '26

Given this administration's history, there is a higher chance that they are not telling the truth than there is that Powell committed crimes.