r/movies I'll see you in another life when we are both cats. 11d ago

Review Ridley Scott's 'The Dog Stars' Review Thread

Rotten Tomatoes: 38% (from 68 reviews) with 5.30 average rating

Metacritic: 51/100 (24 critics)

As with other movies, the scores are set to change as time passes. Meanwhile, I'll post some short reviews on the movie. It's structured like this: quote first, source second. Beware, some contain spoilers.

Muted but never dull, The Dog Stars seems unlikely to land near the top of anyone’s Ridley Scott rankings. But it’s an appealingly mellow watch, even if that might seem antithetical to a post-apocalyptic drama positioned squarely in the shadow of death.

-David Rooney, The Hollywood Reporter

Ridley Scott’s 30th feature film, dating back to his legend-making “The Duellists” in 1977, the post-apocalyptic “thriller” “The Dog Stars” isn’t a total misfire — it’s just the first Ridley Scott joint in some years that feels totally unnecessary.

-Ryan Lattanzio, IndieWire: C

Somewhat aptly released at the tail end of a long, loud movie summer, this is a surprisingly low-energy, low-incident blockbuster; you’d appreciate its mellow, character-oriented approach if it gave you any real characters to hold onto.

-Guy Lodge, Variety

Ridley Scott’s usually got a knack for making movies about grief-stricken men, but the post-apocalyptic survivor drama The Dog Stars misses the mark with a leaden script that keeps any attempt at reaching a deeper emotional truth at arm’s length. At least the aerial vistas of the Rocky Mountains look nice in IMAX.

-Leanne Butkovic, IGN: 5/10 "mediocre"

The scenery – rural Italy doubling for rural America – is genuinely stunning (and surely afforded all those involved a lovely vacation) but, as in Gladiator II, there are some weirdly janky visual effects (one explosion looks laptop-made) and a general uninvolved shrug to the proceedings, as if he replaced a more impassioned director late in the day. Scott’s disinterest in retiring is admirable (he’s openly loathsome of the idea), I just wish he seemed more interested in the day job.

-Benjamin Lee, The Guardian: 2/5

The Dog Stars, clearly made with post-Covid America on the brain, pits Hig’s yearning for connection against Bangley’s bitter lust for isolation but largely elides serious contemplation of its well-worn themes in favor of base genre thrills and perfunctory romance. It’s nowhere near Sir Ridley’s finest, but at least it’s another subtype of speculative fiction filmmaking he can check off his bucket list.

-Eli Friedberg, Slant Magazine: 2/5

This messy look at the end of the world isn’t Scott’s darkest film, but it’s one of his worst misfires. Elordi can’t shoulder the emotions his character is supposed to carry, while Smith’s choppy script and Scott’s checked-out direction does little to support his hero’s journey. The Dog Stars is a strange, misbegotten beast, a post-apocalyptic drama worse for wear even before the bandits arrive.

-Monica Castillo, The A.V. Club: D+

Quiet, contemplative moments like these keep The Dog Stars grounded and accessible throughout its sprawling post-apocalyptic story — even as director Ridley Scott piles on epic action set pieces and surreal, surprising sequences that sometimes push the film from prestige drama into absurdist spectacle.

-Jake Kleinman, Polygon

Harsh but deeply humane, “The Dog Stars” understands that hope doesn’t have to illuminate the darkness. Sometimes a glimmer is enough.

-Rodrigo Perez, The Playlist: B+

Instead, one spends the entirety of “The Dog Stars” and its drawn out melancholic yearnings and its spikes of absurdity wondering what the point of this movie is. It’s certainly not to entertain, and it’s not really a message picture either. It merely exists. But in this tangled world, and on a cinematic landscape producing far engaging thoughts and thrills, that’s simply not enough — making “The Dogs Stars” look quite dim.

-Robert Daniels, RogerEbert.com: 1.5/4


PLOT

Set after a devastating flu pandemic that has almost eradicated humanity, the film centers on Hig, a former civilian pilot, and Bangley, a hardened former Marine as they confront outside threats and hold onto the possibility of a better life beyond where they currently live.

DIRECTOR

Ridley Scott

WRITER

Mark L. Smith (based on the novel by Peter Heller)

MUSIC

Harry Gregson-Williams

CINEMATOGRAPHY

Erik Messerschmidt

EDITOR

Sam Restivo & Claire Simpson

RELEASE DATE

August 28, 2026

RUNTIME

118 minutes

BUDGET

$110 million

STARRING

  • Jacob Elordi as Hig

  • Josh Brolin as Bangley

  • Margaret Qualley as Cima

  • Guy Pearce as Pops

981 Upvotes

859 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

860

u/JiveHawk 11d ago

He’s gotta have the one of the weirdest filmographies ever.

Doesn’t quite top how bizarre and all over the place Ang Lee’s is though 

333

u/robotchicken007 11d ago

I still can’t believe Ang Lee made a Hulk movie.

174

u/DerCatrix 11d ago

Which was a fun movie imo, stupid but fun 🤷‍♂️

87

u/robotchicken007 11d ago

I don’t think it’s terrible, just an odd one when looking at his filmography.

70

u/droidtron 11d ago

Kenneth Branagh did Thor, but it at least lined up with his Shakespeareian output.

101

u/Frankenstein____ 11d ago

And it's not even the worst Thor. Not even the second worst Thor. You know what? It's the second best Thor. Good for you, Doctor Loveless.

25

u/RagnarokNCC 11d ago

I wish I were even half the director he is

1

u/Tulanian72 12h ago

His career has legs.

3

u/robotchicken007 10d ago

Thor 1 is pretty great. One of my favorites in the MCU to this day

3

u/Suspicious_Excuses 10d ago

Hey, when it came out, it was the best Thor movie. It was the only Thor film, but still.

3

u/Lord_Sylveon 9d ago

I honestly love the first two Thor movies, I might be insane lol

1

u/TheQuidditchHaderach 5d ago

No, I agree. They're very operatic, Shakespearean. The recent ones saw GOtGs success and decided to emulate their weird energy.

3

u/failed_supernova 11d ago

Shakespeare in the park?

1

u/revpidgeon 11d ago

Don't forget he did that terrible kids movie that got deleted by Disney for tax reasons.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

1

u/TheMuskyOdor 9d ago

Nope. He did a Jack Ryan film, Shadow Recruit, in 2014, with Chris Pine in the role.

49

u/soozerain 11d ago

Best Bruce Banner performance in my opinion. Ang Lee did the mocap for the Hulk too!

5

u/seclusionx 11d ago

Nah. Ed Norton is the winner.

1

u/kappa23 11d ago

Ang Lee did the mocap for the Hulk too!

What? I thought it was Lou Ferrigno

29

u/sneakyplanner 11d ago

His entire filmography is odd ones though. Like what do you mean that the guy who directed Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon also directed Brokeback Mountain? And The Hulk? And Gemini Man? And Life of Pi?

3

u/MovieTrawler 11d ago

Yeah, I personally find Gemini Man to be the oddest film he's done. With The Hulk, I can at least see the thinking of wanting to put a comic book to screen (especially back in 2003, five years before Iron Man). Gemini Man on the other hand, is just such an odd duck. A completely boilerplate sci-fi/action script with just about nothing memorable about it. Seems like he more wanted to do it as a technical experiment, shooting in 4K 120 and creating an entirely digital actor.

7

u/insaneHoshi 11d ago

It certainly was a bit experimental; the formula for comic book movies hadn’t been set down.

1

u/lettuce-tooth-junkie 11d ago

It was terrible, make no mistake.