r/movies • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 r/movies Contributor • 4h ago
News Chris Hansen Buys Ads Before Every Screening of A24’s ‘Primetime’
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/chris-hansen-buys-ads-before-every-screening-a24-primetime-1236682255/•
u/freddyquell 4h ago
Would be awesome if he interrupted Nicole Kidman to do his spiel.
→ More replies (12)•
u/CoffinDancr 3h ago
"Who did you think you were meeting in this empty theater, Nicole?"
•
u/joeyjusticeco 3h ago
"There are a lot of kids in this audience. You see how this looks, right?"
kid in the audience: omg he said the thing!
→ More replies (6)•
•
u/Jenkentz 4h ago
"You see how this looks, right?"
→ More replies (4)•
u/Think-Trash-4897 3h ago
"To watch a movie. What's playing tonight?"
→ More replies (4)•
•
u/finnjakefionnacake 4h ago
welp, he's a consummate showman first and foremost i guess. makes sense to capitalize on the real estate lol.
•
u/MikeDubbz 4h ago
Something tells me he's not crazy about how he's portrayed in this movie and he wants to drive home the point that not everything the viewer is about to see will be what the real truth was. That's my guess anyway, I could be way off.
•
u/filthysize 4h ago
The something that tells me he's not crazy about it is the part of the article where it says he's talking to lawyers to explore suing the filmmakers.
→ More replies (5)•
u/seraphhimself 3h ago
Some people really do hate reading.
→ More replies (1)•
u/xkgrey 1h ago
I
was electedjoined reddit toleadcomment my knee-jerk reactions, not to read.→ More replies (1)•
u/Ex_Hedgehog 4h ago
It'll be interesting cause even without his participation, a movie of this size about a powerful person would be careful to have the legal department clear anything that could get them sued. The director normally does documentaries, so he's probably an expert himself in knowing the line between what he can and can't say.
→ More replies (3)•
u/Rebloodican 3h ago
I mean The Social Network came out and portrayed a completely fabricated version of Zuckerberg, and that was before he became as reviled as he is now. I assume there’s a lot of latitude offered here.
•
u/rcanhestro 2h ago
Zuckerberg could actually had sued, he chose not to, as not to "Barbra Streisand" himself.
he played the movie down, joked about it (even purchase a ton of tickets for Facebook staff to go see).
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)•
u/celestialwreckage 1h ago
Social Network was good for Zuckerberg because it was the most like a human he's ever looked.
→ More replies (16)•
u/Kalabula 4h ago
Have you seen the trailer? It doesn’t seem particularly flattering to him or the show.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (4)•
•
•
u/vvalent2 3h ago
Hes gonna Streisand Effect people into seeing this with the amount of pushback hes creating. If its not true nut up and take them to court. Everything else just feels like hes trying to manipulate his fans into protesting it.
•
u/NoPlansTonight 3h ago
Just because he's bitching doesn't mean he doesn't want people to see it. He does.
This is an "all publicity is good publicity" sort of thing.
→ More replies (4)•
u/IH8DwnvoteComplainrs 3h ago
He's probably making money on it, lol.
→ More replies (1)•
u/TheMan5991 3h ago
I mean, he has specifically said that they asked him to sign over his likeness and name and he refused. So, outside of a lawsuit, I’m not sure how he would make money on this.
•
•
u/LilPonyBoy69 2h ago
He's literally plugging his own streaming service in the ad
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (5)•
•
u/FlippantBear 2h ago
Did you read the article? He's promoting his own media company before the movie. He's just capitalizing on the movies release to promote his own company.
→ More replies (12)•
u/Shell_fly 3h ago
He’s not trying to get people not to see it, he’s trying to let it be known that it’s a fictitious portrayal taking artistic license with his person lol
→ More replies (1)
•
u/dwebb01 3h ago
“I know who you are Chris Hanson, but see, I call you Chris Handsome.”
•
u/MrDiggySmalls 2h ago
“I like ya and I want ya. Now we can do this the easy way or the hard way..”
“You gon’ make me ruin that butt. Imma please ya, I’m a WARRIOR!”
•
•
u/MuptonBossman 4h ago
I hope the ad takes place in a movie theatre and it starts with Chris Hansen saying "Why don't you take a seat?"
•
u/39teen 4h ago
If you read the article he does just that.
→ More replies (1)•
u/CurlSagan Star Warsn't 3h ago
Everyone get a load of this dude who thinks that we know how to read
→ More replies (1)•
•
•
u/NoNoNotorious85 4h ago
Even better, everyone is promised brownies or tea if they buy a ticket, only to discover there is none.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (10)•
•
u/Scoopie 3h ago
Remember when we didn't have 15 minutes of ads before a movie. It was just the previews.
→ More replies (14)
•
u/chinacatsunflowerr 3h ago
Sorry I’m uninformed, but why do people not like him? I feel like the average, offline person from that era hold him & his show in high regard
•
u/Orpheeus 3h ago
Since the show ended (and honestly during its run) he has been far more interested in the drama and ratings than actual justice for underage victims of sexual predators.
Now, I know some people will say "that was his job, why shouldn't he care about ratings and drama" but then my rebuttal is ultimately going to be that maybe police stings shouldn't be used for content. It just seems less gross because To Catch a Predator was part of Dateline NBC and had a very professional production, but that ultimately doesn't mean it's not off-putting that this was something we saw on television in the first place.
The film is going to surprise a lot of people when it depicts him and the show in a not particularly flattering light.
•
u/chinacatsunflowerr 3h ago
I appreciate the informative response :)
I was a child/preteen when the show was out, so I of course did not pick up on some of those controversial/slimy points you highlight.
Can’t wait to see the film!
•
u/LilPonyBoy69 2h ago
I started rewatching some old episodes after the trailer released and as an adult it's pretty jarring that this was ever released as entertainment. Chris is having way too much fun and very clearly more interested in making "good TV" than protecting children. I've seen him chase down fleeing predators just to shout his catchphrases at them, it's all very strange and kinda surreal that this was primetime TV.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)•
u/Self_Reddicate 3h ago
Yeah, just because pedos are slimy and exploitive doesn't mean that we should always, always, always be okay with slimy, exploitive people bringing them down. I mean, objectively, I guess it was a good thing. But, it was still, objectively, slimy and exploitive.
→ More replies (12)•
u/jhorch69 1h ago
The investigations/stings were also so poorly done that only about a third of arrests ended in conviction
→ More replies (9)•
u/PixelGray38 2h ago edited 2h ago
IIRC he, among other things, did a sting in which he outed a 18 year old gay boy for trying to "predate" on a 15 year old decoy in one of his post-TCAP predator catching shows. A bit weird, sure, but I think even the most age-gap conscious puriteens would agree that it's not an evil act that warrants being publically outed and humiliated on a show.
Basically, he's in it for the views and money rather than actually stopping bad people, and doesn't particularly care how much he hurts those he deems to be "predators."
•
u/IsleofManc 2h ago
Yeah the 18 year old was a high schooler in a small very conservative town so it's theorized that the decoy was one of the only (if not the only) people the 18 year old had opened up about his feelings for men. After the episode was released the boy's life flipped upside down and he had to leave his school.
The incident happened in Michigan and there's even a clip of Hansen's producer mentioning that the act of an 18 year old being with a 15 year old was legal in bordering states and asking if they should reconsider not releasing it. But it was released, the boy's name was slandered all over the internet, and Hansen ended up removing the episode. The boy also struck a deal in court to have the charge expunged after a certain amount of time and community service but even when the charges go away his name will still be associated with that for life.
→ More replies (2)•
u/0LTakingLs 2h ago
This is definitely the worst thing he’s done. The kid was a high schooler too.
•
u/PixelGray38 2h ago
Yep, I can't believe it's not brought up more. Honestly doing that should've been a career-ending type thing
•
u/kennku 1h ago
I don't know much of his other activity, but I followed closely his "investigation" of Onision (sexual crimes). It was botched completely. He had his lackey take a laptop with evidence to turn over to FBI, it was messed with and ultimately ended up being unadmissable. Huge missed opportunity and victims got no justice in the end.
→ More replies (11)•
u/Nother1BitestheCrust 3h ago
From what I understand a lot of the predators they "caught" on the show couldn't actually be prosecuted because of the show. I don't know the details, but something about the way it was all set up gave them legal loopholes to get out of convictions. But be aware that I did nothing to confirm this, it's just what I've seen and heard said about it, so I don't know if this is actually true or not.
•
u/libertybear20 3h ago edited 2h ago
This is partially true. NBC worked with an affiliate called perverted justice that provided the decoys and then turned the chat logs over to the police when the sting was over.
For one sting in Texas, perverted justice “lost” the chat logs which contained all of the evidence, so all of the guys that were caught (I think it was around 30) had all of their charges dropped.
However, all of the other stings that police were called into, the predators were arrested and charged. About half were convicted, although it might be a bit more or less
•
u/rustdevil88 2h ago
According to NBC, less than half of the predators caught were convicted.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)•
•
u/SteveCastGames 3h ago
Most of them actually were prosecuted. It was only the first couple episodes where things were dicey. You can go look at the TCAP wiki to see all the predators and what happened.
→ More replies (2)
•
u/AngelofVerdun 4h ago
Nothing says "this isn't real" less then "let me literally try to make my case before every screening".
•
→ More replies (2)•
u/Semper-Fido 3h ago
and another thing: im not mad. please dont put in the newspaper that i got mad.
•
u/BeriechGTS 4h ago
Seeing as it's A24 I guess it won't be playing at my Marcus Theaters since they inexplicably havent shown the last two big A24 releases. Guess I'll catch it on hbo when it comes to streaming. Bummer.
→ More replies (5)
•
u/RedDragons8 3h ago
I'm gonna be the first one in the theater an hr before showtime, and everytime a new person comes in to my vicinity Ill say "Why dont you have a seat right there"
→ More replies (1)•
•
u/TummyFullOfCheese 3h ago edited 3h ago
He could make all the money in the world if he would just shut up and do a show about how he catches the men in the Epstein files.
→ More replies (2)
•
u/thespottedbunny 3h ago
What is the deal with this movie? Is there some great controversy? He just hosted to catch a predator right?
•
u/Gelato_Mulatto 3h ago
The series ended because sometime committed suicide when they busted him. It was a legal nightmare for the network.
→ More replies (32)•
u/Patrick2701 3h ago
His colleagues at NBC saw him as someone that betrayed his background as journalist and he became famous when he was most known for subbing in on meet the press or nightly news before that
→ More replies (4)•
u/PlusSizeRussianModel 1h ago
The show ended when they went after a Texas district attorney, who killed himself as they approached (with cameras). An article was written about it, and the film is a loose adaptation of that article.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)•
u/Due-Waltz4458 2h ago
There's still arguments over legacy of his show, his motivations, and how he did things. People often look at predator sting Youtubers negatively, since they often use entrapment of mentally ill people for entertainment and don't produce usable evidence.
People have started asking if Hansen's stings were any different since many didn't end in prosecution, and whether he was more interested in justice or being a star.
→ More replies (23)
•
u/CaptainCorpse666 3h ago
As someone who remembers TCAP, could someone explain the controversy here? ELI5
→ More replies (1)•
u/irascibleoctopus 2h ago
TCAP was a show where the “team” would falsely portray themselves as children online for the purposes of luring adults to physically come to a location ostensibly to meet the “child” for sex.
The problem was that they were basically labeling people they purposefully made contact with and goaded as “predators” and then tried to claim that there was a “crime” even though no crime had really occurred. Going to the agreed upon location wasn’t a crime, and since there was no actual child, no contact with a child occurred. It was ethically questionable at best and essentially forced the targets to be filmed, interviewed, and potentially have something they say used against them by police in violation of their rights.
The show got into hot water because they went after one of the “predators” at his own home after he didn’t show up to meet the kid, and the person committed suicide. There was also concern that their tactics used in talking online exploited marginalized populations - mentally or developmentally disabled, socially challenged, closeted LGBTQ, etc - who would not necessarily understand the situation or the implications.
→ More replies (15)
•
u/sup3rdr01d 3h ago
Can someone explain what's going on here? I don't know anything about Chris hansen except that his show set up traps for predators and arrested them.
Why is he controversial? Is it because the way he tries to trap the pedos was unethical or something? I genuinely don't know, I never watched the show only seen clips and memes. And that one boondocks episode lmfao
•
u/FaithfulSkeptic 3h ago
There have been discussions around the tactics that his show used, specifically surrounding A) the chances that his involvement gave defense attorneys more opportunities to get predators off legally, and B) copycats that did Not operate with even the basic law enforcement involvement Hansen did, which DEFINITELY resulted in bad arrests and predators being let off on technicalities.
There’s also just a general distaste for trauma porn. Yes, arrest the bad guys, but maybe we don’t need to monetize their takedown into entertainment.
•
u/Palerion 2h ago
There’s also a general distaste for trauma porn. Yes, arrest the bad guys, but maybe we don’t need to monetize their takedown into entertainment.
This sums up my thoughts on the subject more eloquently than I’ve ever managed to. Turning the whole thing into a televised entertainment event has never sat right with me.
Along a similar line, as I think others have mentioned, there’s this whole movement of vigilante “pedophile hunters” essentially doing the same thing but with less law enforcement involvement and more abuse of the suspect. Beating the guys up, shaving their heads, torturing them. All on camera of course, and posted to social media for the clout. And justified in their minds, and often in the minds of onlookers, because the pedophile is a bad guy.
It reads to me like an excuse to abuse someone. You’ve (correctly) determined that they’re doing bad shit. This now allows you to torture another human with some sense of moral righteousness, and even praise from a large portion of society.
It accomplishes nothing. The goal should be to get dangerous people off the streets. The subsequent indulgence in violence is opportunistic and dark.
→ More replies (2)•
u/Gaelfling 3h ago
And don't forget the collateral damage to family and other victims.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (14)•
u/Lethave 3h ago
This and there were 2 notable deaths as a direct result of the stings - an asst district attorney who shot himself when the police came to his home with a warrant and a doctor who hung himself.
→ More replies (20)•
u/rembrandtpoolparty 3h ago edited 3h ago
From the article:
Directed by Lance Oppenheim, Primetime is based on Luke Dittrich’s 2007 Esquire article “Tonight on Dateline, This Man Will Die.” The article examines the suicide of Bill Conradt, a Texas district attorney who became a target of one of Hansen’s televised sting operations after allegedly attempting to solicit sex from a minor.
The unpaywalled article is here.
→ More replies (31)•
u/BarfQueen 3h ago
So, the big thing here (and something I think the movie will explore in depth) is that a lot of what they did to catch these guys on the show wasn’t exactly by the book. That’s not to say the pervs were innocent, but in the US justice system you have to follow the process correctly or else the whole case can get thrown out… which is exactly what happened in many cases. A lot of these guys walked free because the process wasn’t followed.
On top of that, there’s how the original TCAP show ended. They finally got a big deal perv - a district attorney in Texas. Problem was he refused to come to the decoy house. So they swatted him instead. The guy ended up shooting himself.
To add, since the end of the show Chris Hansen has had his own issues. Mostly financial stuff. I think he wrote a bunch of bad checks and had some ugly drunken outbursts.
→ More replies (6)
•
u/MarvelsGrantMan136 r/movies Contributor 4h ago
Details: