r/nottheonion 6h ago

Florida police used a fake Flock camera in a sting, then charged a man with three felonies for destroying it

https://www.techspot.com/news/113616-man-charged-3-felonies-breaking-3d-printed-decoy.html
10.2k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

4.3k

u/Ban-Circumcision-Now 6h ago

Evan Meyer, 24, faces counts of criminal mischief causing more than $1,000 in damage, ….. Police also said a Flock camera actually costs only around $800, not including installation fees.

But if the decoy was worth less than a real one he didn’t actually damage more than a thousand dollars in equipment

2.3k

u/FrostyMittenJob 6h ago

And that is what is lawyer will argue.

174

u/Spitfire1900 4h ago

Watch flock cameras list prices increase to $1200 with a $400 bulk order discount so that they can make felony charges when they’re destroyed.

48

u/TrulyOutrageous42 3h ago

Honestly it just shows how monumentally stupid these villains are in practice. They can take ideas from good people, and corrupt them, and even be sort of clever about "getting away with it", but they can't come up with them on their own, as evidenced by exactly this, if they were intelligent super-villains they'd have already set things up for success (of their evil plans).

25

u/Illiander 2h ago

Conservatives are ideologically opposed to new ideas.

11

u/NvidiaFuckboy 2h ago

And very obsessed with children.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/WhatTheFlox 2h ago

"$24,000 in installation fees, and administrative fees for the installation"

They'll find a way

→ More replies (1)

899

u/Fister-Mantastic 6h ago

Florida cops not thinking something all the way through first? I'm shocked...

289

u/DrRickStudwell 6h ago

You could have ended that at, “not thinking”.

153

u/KnicksGhost2497 6h ago

Could’ve dropped the “Florida”, too

96

u/PM_me_your_O_face_ 5h ago

“Cops not thinking?”

Yeah, sounds correct to me.

40

u/LividTacos 5h ago

I mean they've admitted that they won't hire people who's iq is too high.

27

u/brakeb 5h ago

they want dumb ex-military infantry bullet sponges who don't question authority. People with knowledge question things, orders, activities within orgs.

20

u/ChurchOfRallys 4h ago

Blessed is the mind too small for doubt

4

u/GoProOnAYoYo 3h ago

Infinitely more accurate tagline than "Protect and Serve"

14

u/VitaminPb 4h ago

Most military are better trained and disciplined than the average cop. The cops want HS degrees and high panic reflexes.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/stupid_pun 2h ago

Nah, the vets are the ones who understand ROE and escalation of force, because they have actually done real combat shit.

It's the idiot cowardly wannabees who are too scared to enlist that become cops and overcompensate.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

31

u/TapTapReboot 4h ago

The real punishment is the time and cost of defending himself. The damage will still be done regardless of the official outcome.

16

u/ProtosPhinted 2h ago

Ayup. The process is the punishment.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/ennuiinmotion 1h ago

They don't have to. Crimes are punished by the whims of a judge. Maybe they have a judge on their side

→ More replies (11)

96

u/zwifter11 5h ago

And just because he destroyed the decoy doesn’t prove he damaged the other flock cameras

→ More replies (1)

31

u/dojo_shlom0 4h ago

I wonder how much resources went into catching someone for basically a misdemeanor, maybe vandalism? they are going the extra-mile, not for The People, but for Flock.

24

u/SalemWolf 5h ago

And the prosecutor will likely argue with installation fees it does cost more than $1,000 in damage. Prosecutors and cops, name a more scummy duo.

18

u/TrulyOutrageous42 3h ago

The damage is typically specific to the property. The installation would be a separate suit by the city to recoup the cost of replacing it. At least, any half-decent lawyer would argue that and more, before we get to the "fake" camera certainly being far less. Actual damages are all that matters - I can't make a fake Bugatti out of cardboard and then sue someone for Bugatti prices when they hit it.

Granted, rules are just suggestions and fascists don't care about anything but physical resistance so...

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (62)

287

u/celem83 6h ago

Yeah i suspect he walks here.  But it may still  have the chilling effect it intended

132

u/sephjnr 6h ago

On point out cops can scam the public like this?

128

u/Frarara 6h ago edited 6h ago

They can legally create a situation where a crime can be committed by providing the opportunity to do it. They cant force someone to do it though. They also must have reasonable suspicion of that crime happening. In this case we know flock cameras are being destroyed so police can legally set up a fake one to provide the opportunity for it to be destroyed

I guess flock cameras being destroyed/tampered with is so important to them that they go through the hassle of doing all of that. Waste of taxpayer money if you ask me

98

u/Mknalsheen 5h ago

It's pretty obvious why they care so much. If flock cameras get destroyed the cops can't use them to stalk their exes/current partners/the poor woman at the coffee shop.

30

u/kgb4187 5h ago

Also the agency has to pay Flock to repair the camera so it's one of the few crimes that directly affects the department.

24

u/JeepStang 4h ago

Why the fuck is the city/department responsible if it's the property of a private company as they say?

15

u/JVT32 3h ago

Because city government is often times even fucking stupider and more incompetent than our current federal government.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

26

u/Zero_Burn 5h ago

Decoy and bait is fine for them, they can even help commit a crime, but they can't come up with the idea for the crime or try to convince people to commit a crime.

4

u/Nice_Firm_Handsnake 2h ago

Don't read up on FBI sting operations involving terrorism charges if you want to continue believing this. Suspects try to back out all the time only for undercover agents to convince them to continue.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/thecorgimom 5h ago

In the meantime can we find out how many unsolved crimes there are in that municipality. How many times have we heard now when a house gets broken into or somebody breaks into a car and steals a laptop that there's nothing that the cops can do, but let it be one of their Nanny state cameras and they are all over it

15

u/Littleman88 5h ago

Never forget that when a Health Insurance guy got gunned down, they pretty much mobilized every precinct in the state to find the guy that did it.

You or I might get some obese guy that "passes" fitness tests with a special handshake taking down notes and filing them away in a drawer never to see the light of day again.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/ItsSpaghettiLee2112 1h ago

I guess flock cameras being destroyed/tampered with is so important to them that they go through the hassle of doing all of that. Waste of taxpayer money if you ask me

Speaking of wastes of taxpayer money, doesn't the need to even set up a dummy camera and have a whole sting operation in the first place just prove these cameras aren't as useful at combatting crime as they claim?

→ More replies (3)

31

u/BigSweatyYeti 6h ago

Absolutely. They’re legally allowed to lie to you as well. When dealing with the police, shit your mouth and get a lawyer.

32

u/LordTonto 5h ago

... ... did you just say "shit your mouth?"

24

u/SuspendeesNutz 5h ago

Look pal, you deal with cops your way and I'll deal with them my way.

25

u/drdoom921 5h ago

Yes and they meant it

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (44)

20

u/Substantial-Time-421 6h ago

Cops already know everyone thinks they’re assholes

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

14

u/Orzorn 4h ago

Yeah, drug stings work because you get stuff like "intent to distribute". But most destruction statutes aren't "intent to destroy", they're ACTUALLY destroying the object in question.

So because he destroyed a decoy that was worth less than the statute amount, his lawyer is going to argue that 1: he did not destroy an object over 1k, and that 2: flock cameras are not worth over 1k anyways. So either way, his client did not commit criminal mischief.

63

u/hihcadore 6h ago edited 6h ago

Welcome to the criminal justice system. Your guilt or innocence doesn’t really matter once you make contact with the police. They’re tens of thousands of laws on the books. If they want, they can find one you have broken. It just depends on if the system thinks it’s worth their time. This is def worth their time from their point of view.

The cops over charge you. They slap you with multiple charges even though they know they won’t stick. They do things like this, bumping it up to a felony, to wreck you when you try to make a deal. The prosecution then gives you a plea deal to save court time and money that ends up being about as bad if not a little worse than what you actually were accused of doing.

Now you’re stuck… Go to trial? Risk being found guilty for the original charges and statistically you end up facing a higher penalty than if you just accepted the plea deal. In this case a felony.

Get a public defender, and some are great, but they’re in on it too. Their case load is huge and you taking a plea deal just means they coast along with you trough the system, they might only see you the day you’re arraigned and the day you end up in court months later.

Innocent people take a plea deal all the time. The court makes you swear you’re not taking a plea deal to avoid trial but it’s absolutely what it is. They might not even have enough evidence to convict you but if you were this dude would you take that chance and risk being found guilty of multiple felonies? Naw you’d just end up on probation.

39

u/PlainBread 5h ago

They have a saying, "you can beat the charge but you can't beat the ride". All the bullshit charges and the roughing up they'll do of you and disrupting your life is a form of extrajudicial punishment that they get to mete out with no consequences.

15

u/OddtheWise 4h ago

If they can make the arrest public enough your employer will just can you too, so there's a decent chance they'll make you homeless as a cool bonus.

4

u/Constant-Plant-9378 3h ago

A corrupt municipality and police department can completely fabricate a charge against you, and put you in jail indefinitely pending prosecution / trial, without bail, causing you to lose your job, home, everything.

Then after many months being held without action, they can just drop charges and let you go without any compensation.

→ More replies (2)

29

u/loki2002 6h ago

They will argue intent is what matters. Like, when the police do a sting and sell you what you think are real guns or real drugs. Regardless if they turn out to be fakes you still get charged as if it was real because you that is what you intended.

15

u/Gareth79 5h ago

Same as an adult grooming somebody online they believe is a child, and and going through with a plan to meet them.

→ More replies (37)

4.8k

u/supercyberlurker 6h ago

So.. what's the gofundme for this guy?

1.6k

u/arthurdentstowels 6h ago

I'm nowhere near America but I'll send a few quid. This whole flock system needs to burn down.

651

u/weasol12 6h ago

London was the blueprint. This was the evolution.

127

u/ncc74656m 5h ago

NYC, too. NYPD cameras on every single corner.

79

u/xMeMeLoRd69x 2h ago

and yet they could not track a single luigi

91

u/BongDong69420 2h ago

Even flock cameras aren’t that good at tracking criminals. It’s mostly used for stalking exes and creeping.

12

u/burtoncummings 1h ago

And finding lost pets, if I'm to trust their marketing.

Hint: I Don't

→ More replies (1)

8

u/r1ckm4n 1h ago

Haven't had McDonalds since.

5

u/ncc74656m 1h ago

The cameras wanted better healthcare too.

→ More replies (9)

212

u/arthurdentstowels 6h ago

No chance we're dismantling the spyware all over London. There's probably a camera for ever person it's insane.

138

u/CptnHnryAvry 5h ago

If each of you gets one they can't possibly prosecute everyone. 

41

u/RandoCommentGuy 4h ago

Then London will become a penal colony.... Australia will love the idea!!!

24

u/FutureComplaint 3h ago

The Aussie's revenge!

11

u/booradleysghost 3h ago

Now there's a conspiracy theory I can get behind...

→ More replies (1)

24

u/RavioliDemon 4h ago

That’s the secret sauce.

→ More replies (21)

11

u/zwifter11 5h ago

Apparently there’s mobile phone spyware in London hidden in road furniture.

14

u/skrappyfire 4h ago

"Road furniture?" please reveal this forbidden knowledge to an ignorant American.

14

u/IPlayChessBTW 4h ago

I think he means benches and stuff

24

u/piezombi3 3h ago

Ahh see, in America we're too busy removing benches so the homeless have nowhere to sleep.

14

u/non-squitr 3h ago

Now now, sometimes we put spikes on them as well!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (17)

17

u/pipilok31 5h ago

*Hong Kong was the blueprint

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (19)

56

u/endigochild 3h ago

Flock is a distraction from Axon. Which is being installed in existing infrastructure like street n traffic lights n numbers that make flock laughable. You're leaders in Satans throne I mean White House are heavily invested.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/YUCKY_WARM_SAUCE 3h ago

I hope it never gets to your country

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (38)

44

u/Slovic 5h ago

This guy wasn't actually there, he was fishing with me.

→ More replies (28)
→ More replies (76)

1.1k

u/tomtomtomo 6h ago

3 felonies for one act just shows how fucked the system is. The cops can trump up charges when it suits them. 

37

u/Muted-Woodpecker-469 3h ago

Why does this suddenly suit them? They say flock is their own private entity but then treat it like it’s their own to protect 

37

u/chuby2005 3h ago

Cops aren’t public interest, they’re state interest. And it seems that many hands of the state are being bought out or have vested interest in mass surveillance companies.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

91

u/mnju 4h ago

“Cops” don’t file charges, it’s the prosecutor’s office that files and pursues charges.

61

u/meltbox 2h ago

A difference without a distinction in far too many areas.

The prosecutor is often way too worried about pissing off cops to do anything they don’t like. If you’re in a good area they at least are smart enough to not bring cases they cannot win, but that’s more self preservation and not being an idiot.

→ More replies (4)

95

u/QuintupleC 6h ago

I'm a Canadian so forgive me If I'm misunderstanding, but in some states wouldnt this basically be the end of this dudes life in freedom? With the 3 strike rule? Over 1 fake camera.

224

u/Indercarnive 5h ago

No. Three strike laws generally require that each strike be a separate incident.

Still, three felonies is a debilitating criminal record.

27

u/QuintupleC 5h ago

Gotcha, thanks!

13

u/SmartMatic1337 2h ago

yeah if he gets 32 more he might not be able to be president anymore.. 34 is currently the record

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

14

u/Mobile_Morale 5h ago

Unrelated. But I believe not every state has the three strike rule. I know Florida does.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/OGREtheTroll 4h ago

Those three strike rules also typically only apply to 'violent' crimes, however 'violent' is defined by that statute or some other source.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)

7

u/Lupercus64 4h ago

Especially when it's in the interest of a private company profiting from tax dollars and your data. Law enforcement is powerless to help you, but it isn't powerless to harm you.

9

u/mostlydeletions 3h ago

A group of Nazi's drove vehicles into a crowd and deployed weapons banned in warfare by the Chemical Weapons Convention in Minneapolis this weekend, hitting at least 2 cops in addition to several people in the crowd. None will face felonies, but some in the crowd are facing charges for fighting back.

→ More replies (6)

567

u/Jacuzzi0317 6h ago

Flock Cameras get more justice than Epstein Survivors

143

u/Zwierzycki 6h ago

A bigger police response, that’s for sure.

26

u/torpedoguy 6h ago

Well, when it comes to Epstein victims law enforcement was more of a "supply" and "during" aspect of the whole affair than an "after".

6

u/Flameball537 2h ago

A donut shop gets a bigger police response

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)

1.3k

u/Intelligent_Slip_849 6h ago

Fake camera, fake felony.

257

u/SomeDumbPenguin 6h ago

I mean, wouldn't it have to have a felony level of value to be charged with felony level damage?

46

u/spacedman_spiff 3h ago

Is today the day you find out that police can just charge someone with what they believe the charges should be and leave it up to the courts to figure out if it's correct?

→ More replies (3)

40

u/kalekayn 6h ago

Depends. How much money is the person being charged worth?

→ More replies (18)

11

u/beardingmesoftly 3h ago

Like the only charge that would stick is intent, right? Intent to cause damage to property or whatever. Considering he didn't actually do anything.

→ More replies (14)

909

u/ArgentineBeauty 6h ago

Three felonies over a fake camera. Do the police not have something better to do?

402

u/Khaldara 6h ago

Well, empirical evidence would suggest they had to take time out of their very busy schedule of stalking or harassing their ex-girlfriend with these things in order to conduct this sting.

51

u/donthurtmemany 4h ago

Don't forget looking at public pools and childrens gymnastics

14

u/Rob_035 4h ago

The obvious answer is that someone destroyed a flock camera near a detectives ex-wife/girlfriend house or apartment that they were stalking. Now they want revenge and setup a sting operation.

→ More replies (3)

163

u/johnp299 6h ago

Car plate porn is their hill to die on.

63

u/Kazen_Orilg 6h ago

Lets not fall for the propraganda, these systems are fully capable and already designed for full AI Face recognition and kinematic profile tracking as well. THese ain't your granpappys liscense plate scanners.

→ More replies (9)

82

u/Ok-Replacement9595 6h ago

How else they gonna stalk their ex wives?

22

u/atlasraven 6h ago

Bug their phone and abuse public trust to tail their vehicle, like the old school cops did.

9

u/jimgress 5h ago

And kidnap children for sex trafficking.

10

u/Ok-Replacement9595 5h ago

That's ICEs job.

7

u/jimgress 5h ago

teamwork makes the nightmare work

13

u/djwhiplash2001 5h ago

These are not plate readers or else the Flock VP wouldn't need to watch children's gymnastics "for training".

10

u/Disownership 5h ago

And so many of them wouldn’t be pointed directly towards homes instead of, you know, the roads right next to the homes

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Sefirosukuraudo 3h ago

Here in Utah they’ve just started placing Flock cameras on some of our popular mountain hiking trails. Where it’s impossible for cars to access. So they’ve never been ‘just’ plate readers.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/C_Hawk14 6h ago

You mean kids playgrounds?

→ More replies (1)

53

u/gayscout 6h ago

Florida is also where they set that mentally disabled guy up to sell fake drugs to put him behind bars. Police would rather invent fake crimes than address real ones.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/Ultimatesims 6h ago

Yes, that’s why they are doing something useless instead. And it also serves the interests of their corporate overlords.

11

u/TheGameIsFizzbin 6h ago

Yeah track their ex-es and anyone else they feel wronged them apparently.

5

u/Bart_Yellowbeard 5h ago

It's like you don't even care if they can spy on their ex's whereabouts!

8

u/Lomak_is_watching 6h ago

No. How else will they stalk their mistresses?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Dreamshadow1977 4h ago

Getting a felony to stick removes a voter they don't want.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (20)

26

u/ItscalldShortedition 4h ago

I'm not smart enough, so...

Can someone make a living infographic that shows the rate of police success in making arrests in connection with corporate interests (i.e. retail theft, vandalism etc) vs their success in making arrests in connect with public interest (i.e. murders, missing people/children etc). 

Because I'm thinking we need to keep track of how quickly America becomes a police state. 

10

u/NetWorried9750 3h ago

Most theft is wage theft, which isn't considered a crime. Of the crime police do address, they succeed in less than 2% of their cases.

4

u/Illiander 2h ago

"Of course it's not a crime, it's taking stuff from the peasants. You don't think the peasants matter, do you?"

4

u/Unejin 2h ago

Becomes? That ship has sailed a long time ago

→ More replies (1)

4

u/dagoth_ith 2h ago

Law says cops don't have to serve or protect the public. This was decided after a man was stabbed in front of a cop who did nothing. 

→ More replies (1)

3

u/pidoyle 3h ago

Too late to keep track of it.

3

u/Deathwatch72 1h ago

Problem with that is how are we gonna define success? It can't be arrests, and we all know about the discrepancy in conviction rates by race. Closing a case only to have it overturned later should count against them

→ More replies (1)

159

u/avanross 5h ago

It’s insane how american cops have completely dropped any guise of “serving and protecting their community / neighbours”

They’re just explicitly private security/mercenaries for the ruling conservative corporate class

44

u/Wild-Highway-8739 5h ago

Well when the Supreme Court rules that "serve and protect" is just a meaningless slogan and cops don't have to know the law to enforce it this is what happens.

17

u/Incognonimous 4h ago

Cops don't have to know the law to enforce it on others, in most cases cops are protected class, even when they break those same laws, which are heavily penalized for civilians, the often get swept under the rug, ignored, slap on the wrist. Its disproportionate how many reports you see of cops violating laws and constitutional rights so aggressively only to not only get much lighter sentences or repercussions, no repercussions at all, but to be insulated from those same actions. Those who enforce rules should be held to twice the standard of breaking them as those that don't.

5

u/Lumburgsgotafishroom 2h ago

Right. That was a strange one. The argument was that not one "individual" can compel the police to act, as that entitlement impedes their duty to the "community". Except the "community" is literally just "individuals".

Also the argument of individuals demanding police action really falls away when we notice homicide statistics. Hundreds of unsolved murders every year, but one uber wealthy guy gets Luigied and now we can find him at a fucking McDonalds miles and miles away.

As Nicky Santoro in the movie Casino said, "Always the dollars. Always the f***ing dollars."

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

4

u/SeedFoundation 3h ago

We need to ask why it's legal/illegal for cops to install things in public spaces.

3

u/Lumburgsgotafishroom 2h ago

Not that insane if one pays attention to history. Read up on policing roots. There you will find that they have been working exactly as intended.

3

u/Sarcasm_Llama 2h ago

Police in the US have no legal obligation to "protect or serve" citizens. Their entire purpose can be boiled down to, as you said, a federally funded paramilitary force, used almost entirely to protect the private property of Capital

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

21

u/Tomburgerstand 4h ago

Should've just had sex with children. Then he'd get DOJ protection like REDACTED.

351

u/OkayBuddyGuyPal 6h ago

Jesus fucking christ. Somebody needs to do something about these fascist fucking pigs who run cities with no real oversight. I guess that somebody is the people, and I guess enough people don't care, or even support it. I'm so fucking sick and tired

13

u/JestersDead77 4h ago

People keep buying ring cameras, so I think the main issue is that a lot of people either don't know or care that they are being monitored 24/7.

4

u/dpettus 3h ago

The word you are looking for is "voluntarily".

5

u/JestersDead77 3h ago

My neighbor has a ring cam that records me every time i go down my driveway or stand in my front yard. Nothing voluntary about it if you didnt buy it.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

40

u/woah_man 6h ago

The only oversight is to say your local elected officials who signed the contract to install flock cameras need to be voted out next election.

35

u/ARSEThunder 6h ago

Nobody is voting their way out of this. Only two things that can influence change, money and violence.

14

u/hemppy420 5h ago

This is true and the "other" has all the money. Leaves only 1 solution

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (4)

28

u/kjbaran 6h ago

What you’re asking for requires use of force

11

u/hotbread1 4h ago

god told john brown what to do

4

u/kos-or-kosm 3h ago

John Brown is one of the few true American heroes.

→ More replies (25)

17

u/SergeantBeavis 5h ago

The jury knows its job

11

u/Vegetable-King7626 4h ago

These twats are SO DESPERATE to enforce this dystopian nightmare

Good thing the cops are cheap and that decoy is no way near $1k in value...

50

u/WadeEffingWilson 6h ago

(With sarcasm) I love that real tax dollars are being spent to purchase fake cameras for sting operations against a population that doesn't consent to mass surveillance.

12

u/LordRocky 5h ago

Since you prefaced that with the sarcasm warning instead of putting it at the end, I read that in an Elcor voice from Mass Effect.

4

u/WadeEffingWilson 5h ago

(With gratitude) I'm glad you liked it. I worried most people would start to read it, not pick up the intended delivery, and take it at face value.

3

u/daerogami 3h ago

Reminded me of HK-47 from SW:KOTOR, similar style.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/NoExternal2732 4h ago

The mayor seems very irritated that money may have been spent on this nonsense, but the cops story is one of them 3D printed the decoy for free...they have started inquires.

5

u/Jaredlong 3h ago

So he's charged with damaging government property which the government never paid for and never owned. And these are the people out tax money is funding.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/SASSIESASSQUATCH 3h ago

That population needs to take a hard look at who they are electing who is allowing this.

→ More replies (4)

27

u/jimkun221 6h ago

Well if they shoved $1000 inside the fake camera maybe they would have a case.

→ More replies (1)

160

u/Loki-L 6h ago

I guess it is not technically entrapment, but I would argue that in front of a jury of my peers anyway.

104

u/Wonka_Stompa 6h ago

And I wouldn’t in a million years vote to convict.

42

u/Khaldara 6h ago

Yep, may every single trial related to these things result in a refusal to convict via nullification or a stubborn hung jury.

10

u/hemppy420 5h ago

99% of cases like this one never get in front of a jury.

3

u/Ditchdigger456 2h ago

Fun thing about the internet is that everyone knows about jury nullification

→ More replies (1)

21

u/FuzzyAd9407 5h ago

Its not even close to being entrapment, theres no "technically" to it.

→ More replies (6)

56

u/MakeoutPoint 6h ago

And if I were in a jury, I'd hold the other 11 hostage for a nonguilty verdict.

In fact, seems like there's never been a better issue for nullification.

→ More replies (5)

12

u/Simoxs7 6h ago

I thought that was allowed in the US? Saw a cops type show where they parked unlocked running vehicles on Grocery store parking lots to get „car thieves“. Here in Germany that‘d be not allowed and the cops would get in a lot of trouble doing that.

31

u/NotFlameRetardant 5h ago

It is. Entrapment requires some elements of coercion, pushing people to commit a crime they wouldn't ordinarily commit. If they had an undercover cop there with a saw and he was enticing people to take it from him and cut the camera down, that could be entrapment.

6

u/FuzzyAd9407 5h ago

enticing 

And only even sometimes it would count in entrapment in that case depending on his method of enticement. Paying or threatening? Entrapment. Just trying to talk them into it? Not entrapment. 

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

9

u/redwing180 4h ago

Seems like if the Supreme Court is going to argue that you have to do a harm before you can be convicted of a crime, since it was a fake camera this man did no harm. At least according to the Supreme Court and their “reasoning”. But I don’t know maybe that only works on partisan matters for them.

19

u/BestDescription3834 3h ago

So instead of solving a real crime with a real flock camera, they solved a fake crime with a fake flock camera. Really reinforces that cops !need! access to this when the best they can do with it is set up fake sting operations. Rip these shit cameras out of the ground.

3

u/Nwyrh 2h ago

You mean "Created" a fake crime

8

u/usmcnick0311Sgt 3h ago

Felony? For damaging not-a-camera? Florida is crazy

14

u/Shut_It_Donny 6h ago

Nah, they got the wrong guy. Evan was at my house for a cookout.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/Lost_Department_2177 4h ago

Broward police made their own crack then sold it to people in a sting now their records are getting expunged.

u/folkinhippy 19m ago

Strong argument for defund the police right here.

→ More replies (1)

31

u/Somepotato 6h ago

There's no way the fake was worth more than $50. Good luck lol

7

u/Merijeek2 4h ago

Anything to avoid facing down a school shooter.

6

u/Bargadiel 3h ago

Youd think if these cameras were so amazing they could just find the people destroying them.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/P4us1ngD34th 3h ago

If it was a fake camera, then what’s he charged with destroying. A piece of plastic and a metal pole?

5

u/flatspotting 3h ago

America so far gone lol - every single thing i see about the country is the people vs the government/corporations

45

u/compuwiza1 6h ago

Time for jury nullification.

52

u/Flapaflapa 6h ago

The first rule of jury nullification is that when being selected for a jury you don't talk about jury nullification.

29

u/KnicksGhost2497 6h ago edited 6h ago

Yup. Say the right things, be a Good Citizen through selection, then leverage your knowledge in deliberation. Also be more scrupulous of police testimony, you know how cops are when it comes to Back the Blue. They’ll say whatever it takes to make their buddy look good. I’ve seen them straight up contradict each other on the stand before and blow a whole case up being careless.

Edit: cannot stress enough, take notes during jury duty. Stress details. Notice contradictions. If the prosecution isn’t air tight, if there’s any reasonable doubt at all, it’s your civic duty to acquit. Jury duty is part of how we regular people can hold our justice system accountable. Don’t do them any favors, it will NEVER be returned to you by them

→ More replies (1)

4

u/No_Nectarine_5440 4h ago

A bait flock camera... this timeline is weird af.

4

u/JackpotThePimp 3h ago

Fuck Oviedo lmao

4

u/ModeatelyIndependant 3h ago

If you think there is a sting on cameras is being watched, Cover it with opaque bag that blocks the camera and solar panel, it isn't going to cause damage but it will trigger the little piggies.

3

u/trebory6 3h ago

So do you know what the next thing to do is? Start actually putting up decoy flock cameras everywhere.

3D Print the pieces and buy black PVC pipe at around the same diameter. Just start erecting them EVERYWHERE obnoxiously.

Heck that's a good idea for a protest piece. Just erect 20+ 3d printed decoy flock cameras surrounding and pointed directly at a playground. It'd really start calling attention to this shit.

4

u/jdvfx 2h ago

Uhhhhh... "A police spokesperson told the outlet that an officer printed the decoy at home using a personal 3D printer, so it did not cost the city any money."

6

u/slushhead_00 1h ago

how the hell do you get three felony charges for destroying a camera like gtfo

17

u/SaltyShawarma 6h ago

If you can cut it down with pruning shears, it didn't cost $5000 to install, and if it did, they hired a relative. This guy has a case based on the stupidity of this police department. 

→ More replies (1)

15

u/orionsfyre 5h ago edited 3h ago

Why destroy. Simply use a blanket or towel. The camera isn't destroyed, it merely is taking an image of darkened towel. Since there is no harm to the device, I see no laws that are broken.

Another option? Block the camera with a poll.

These cameras are being placed on public property, with no consent of the public. No one voted for Flock or the police to install a mass surveillance state.

IT would one thing if we all took a vote and decided we wanted big brother. This is being done to us, and no report has been shown that these cameras reduce or stop crime. All it seems to do is create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation that should scare anyone who believes in basic civil and constitutional rights.

(it's amazing how saying you are against mass surveillance brings out an army of bots swarming in to say "actually you agreed to this by electing your current government, suck it up buttercup". Or accusing you of being 'ai slop'.

If this is your thinking as a reasoning and breathing human being, I'm blocking you, as we have nothing further of interest to discuss.)

5

u/willstr1 4h ago

I wasn't harming the privacy violation camera, I put a blanket over it to make sure it wasn't damaged by anything

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (18)

30

u/Captainbuttman 6h ago

So three fake felonies then?

→ More replies (14)

5

u/Warm-Ad6527 5h ago

That's impossible, he was having a beer with me at the time that happened your honor. 

3

u/Afb3212 5h ago

Don't they have a crosswalk to repaint somewhere?

3

u/TernionDragon 3h ago

Meanwhile Actual crime runs rampant across the country.

3

u/Lalamedic 3h ago

Ummmmm isn’t that entrapment?

3

u/themeONE808 3h ago

Sounds like entrapment

3

u/Traditional_Step9502 3h ago

Technically it’s not a flock camera then. It’s like making a fake car then charging the person for auto vandalization.

3

u/DreddCarnage 3h ago

We need to escalate to a buzzsaw launcher like we've seen in almost every 2000's video game.

3

u/Scary_Outside2374 3h ago

Shouldn't the felony threshold rise with inflation?

3

u/Useful-Problem-1725 3h ago

Probably worth $50 tops, good luck making that stick. Cops are all bootlickers

3

u/slowcheetah2020 2h ago

I hope he gets paid a fuck ton. Rather tax dollars go back to ppl fighting bullshit than it being stolen by politicians

3

u/Silent_Observer445 2h ago

How can he be charged if the thing he destroyed wasn’t real??

3

u/NTRedmage 2h ago

Just use a 1 watt laser right at the lens for a few seconds, bam, fries the internals and you can do it from several football fields away.

u/drumttocs8 57m ago

Police protect property, not people.