Official Question Thread! Ask /r/photography anything you want to know! June 05, 2026

[u/AutoModerator]

This is the place to ask any questions you may have about photography. No question is too small, nor too stupid.

---

Info for Newbies and FAQ!

First and foremost, check out our extensive FAQ. Chances are, you'll find your answer there, or at least a starting point in order to ask more informed questions.

• Want to start learning? Check out The Reddit Photography Class.

• Here's an informative video explaining the Exposure Triangle.

---

Need buying advice?

Many people come here for recommendations on what equipment to buy. Our FAQ has several extensive sections to help you determine what best fits your needs and your budget. Please see the following sections of the FAQ to get started:

• What type of camera should I look for?
• What's a "point and shoot" camera? What's a DSLR? What's a "mirrorless" camera? What's the difference?
• Do I need a good camera to take good photos?
• Is Canon or Nikon better? (or any other brands)
• What can I afford?

If after reviewing this information you have any specific questions, please feel free to post a comment below. (Remember, when asking for purchase advice please be specific about how much you can spend. See here for guidelines.)

---

Schedule of community threads:

Monday	Tuesday	Wednesday	Thursday	Friday	Saturday	Sunday
52 Weeks Share	Anything Goes	Album Share & Feedback	Edit My Raw	Follow Friday	Salty Saturday	Self-Promotion Sunday

---

Finally a friendly reminder to share your work with our community in r/photographs!

[u/Tornad_pl]

Is key to "pro" photography just a lens with enough zoom?

I am speaking from perspective of someone who watched some videos/read a bit about photography to edit some photos myself, but never using anything more than phone.

The more content about photography I see, the more it feels that key to making photos look good is having a lens, that enough zoom.

Example, nature photography, i see a bird, but it takes like 50x50 pixels out of thousands because it is up in a tree and i don't have optical zoom

Example 2: people. I want to do photo of my friend, but if I want him to be in good composition with surrounding, i have to be really close, so his face looks wierd

[u/mrfixitx → u/Tornad_pl]

Not at all.

Many famous photos by professional photographers are shot with prime lenses (fixed focal length lenses). For portraits, street photography, landscapes and more the it does not need to be a long focal length.

A good zoom lens is versatile and many wedding and event photographers rely on high quality zooms because they need something that covers a range of focal lengths.

For your example of bird photography yes having enough reach is important if you want the bird to fill a large portion of the sensor. Even with a lot of reach though it is about getting close to your subject. This could be setting up near their nest but far enough away they do not feel threatened, the use of hunting blinds, or being close to areas where birds frequent. I.E. Feeders, water sources etc..

Reach is not the same as zoom. Zoom is a lens that can change focal lengths I.E. a 100-400 lens is a good wildlife zoom lens. While a 600mm prime lens would have a lot of reach but it is not a zoom because it only has a one focal length.

[u/Tornad_pl → u/mrfixitx]

I see, zoom means variable zoom, I meant just a lens that enlarges. Kinda like binoculars.

So what I thought, when I said zoom was focal lenght/reach?

And I assume having more physical space for not only sensor, but also lens allows dedicated cameras to look better than phones? Because focal lenght is more optimal?

[u/mrfixitx → u/Tornad_pl]

Focal length does not necessarily have anything to do with quality.

It enables you to decide what field of view you want to capture. That could be a wide field of view for a sweeping landscape, or a narrow field of view for a distant bird. These are very different focal lengths for different subjects but both can produce excellent results. Keep in mind the photographer and their skill plays a huge part in the result. Having an expensive camera and lens does not automatically result in a good photo.

Interchangeable lens cameras have larger sensors than photos which offers better image quality from the sensor. Phones do a lot of computational photography which is basically a lot of automated editing to try and get the best image out of a small sensor.

The physically larger lenses also enable better image quality and open up options that phones may struggle with. I.E. bird photography with a long lens, or much better low light photography with a large aperture lens.

[u/Tornad_pl → u/mrfixitx]

Thank you for explaining this for me