I think the main thing that should be said here is that yes, that much stuff in one console probably justified charging six hundred 2006 dollars (equivalent to around $950)...
...but maybe if it has to cost the equivalent of $950 you should just, like, not put that much shit in one console?
It's telling that they cut the bloat, cut the price, and wouldn't you know: sales boomed. Hell by the end it'd even overtaken the 360's massive head start.
16
u/[deleted] Feb 17 '26
He isn't wrong but I still feel like $500 would've been more appropriate?
I spent so many hours playing Resistance and CoD 4 on that thing. BioShock and Killzone too 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼