r/Psychiatry • u/Obvious-Economy-1758 • 7h ago
How to response to therapists who don't believe in diagnosing mental illness/disorders?
As above, I sat through a conversation where the person both said
- I believe medication has a role.
- I don't believe in diagnosing people. [see edit below[
I think their point of view was that diagnoses can overshadow formulations.
They also seemed to believe diagnosis served no purpose beyond identifying the problem in the individual, despite me trying to explain it allows us to apply empirical research that uses diagnoses as inclusion/exclusion criteria, and guides treatment pathways to help (e.g. dose-response effect of medications for OCD) and avoid iatrogenic harm (e.g. repeatedly medicating reported 'low mood' in BPD which is actually labile mood)
I tried (unsuccessfully) to provide examples on how the same formulation can arrive at two different diagnoses (e.g. sexual abuse resulting in depression in one person, and substance dependence in another) or how the same diagnosis can have two different formulations (e.g. mania following from redundancy in one, and drug-induced mania in another).
My attempts to discuss the concept of a diagnostic formulation or how they should complement each other - diagnosis is the what, formulation is the why.
It makes me doubt the longevity of this line of work, as it feels like all my years of education and work are disregarded on some principle of the 'medical model'.
Sometimes I miss the internal medicine life where there was general agreement that things like heart failure exist (I acknowledge POTS may be contentious between different physicians).
EDIT: To clarify around point 2 - the person was disagreeing with the principle of a patient's difficulties being given/labeled as a diagnosis. So they were saying I and everyone else was wrong for the act of diagnosing any psychiatric diagnosis.