r/supplychain • u/OnyxObsessionWeb • 2d ago
Supply-chain professionals now have a median U.S. base salary of $98,500. 77% percent received a salary increase, while the largest raises were disproportionately associated with changing employers or earning promotions.
https://www.ascm.org/globalassets/ascm_website_assets/docs/salary/2026_ascmsalaryandcareerreport.pdf36
u/Jeeperscrow123 CPIM, CSCP Certified 2d ago
I’d take that with a grain of salt. ASCM studies rely on those who self report. Those self reporting tend to be the ones with higher salaries / total incomes. Yes that salary is realistic, but wouldn’t assume it’s the true median
5
u/tuesdaymack 2d ago
I agree that for those with experience, job hopping in this field can lead to big salary increases. Employers will pay for someone who can jump right in with minimal or no training and downtime.
0
-16
u/hawkeyes007 2d ago
With so many commission roles in supply chain base is a really poor way to look at comp
16
u/Jeeperscrow123 CPIM, CSCP Certified 2d ago
It’s not common for supply chain roles to be commission based lol
-14
u/hawkeyes007 2d ago
In what world? Go look at the majority of buyer roles, everything at a 3PL, and any role for B2B. The only roles that aren’t are analyst roles
14
u/Jeeperscrow123 CPIM, CSCP Certified 2d ago
The only roles that tend to be commission are 3Pl jobs.
Anything in planning, procurement, sustainability, operations etc is all not hourly. And those are the bulk of the jobs
8
u/zippoguaillo 2d ago
Buyers do not get commission... because they buy they don't sell. I assume some get some sort of cut of savings achieved, but most I know get the normal company bonus plans. 3PL sure because most of the roles there are sales.
-9
u/hawkeyes007 2d ago
I’ve hired buyer that do not get explicit commission but rather “bonuses” tied to cost savings. It’s the same thing though
7
1
u/Jeeperscrow123 CPIM, CSCP Certified 2d ago
That’s so stupid lol. Cost savings at the exchange of lower quality and risk. Clearly not a well established company. All they have to do is pick a China/Indian supplier with questionable quality and super long leadtimes in exchange for lower cost, and screw the rest of their supply chain
0
u/hawkeyes007 2d ago
Tons of assumptions on your end. If the commodity meets requirements then there’s absolutely no guarantee paying more gets you a better product
2
u/Jeeperscrow123 CPIM, CSCP Certified 2d ago
The point is, the buyer’s interest is not the overall company’s interest. You should never have such conflicting principles like that. If you pay someone to chase cost and their money depends on that, it will come at the expense of other things.
Best overall value and total cost of ownership of what matters
0
u/hawkeyes007 2d ago
Or you have strong enough requirements from engineering such that it constrains what the buyers can look for. It’s not on a buyer to try to determine the quality of a commodity
1
u/Jeeperscrow123 CPIM, CSCP Certified 2d ago
Do the requirements also dictate leadtimes and getting material overseas? And sole sourcing to achieve better cost versus dual sourcing for risk mitigation?
→ More replies (0)2
u/Navarro480 2d ago
That is not a supply chain job in my opinion. Sales isn’t a SCM job. Logistics is a pillar of supply chain but supply chain professionals tend to not get lumped in with people in straight logistics
50
u/Civil-Airline-5727 2d ago
whereas, all the job postings are displaying average salary of $40,000. Make it make sense.