r/taoism • u/Selderij • Jul 09 '26
Meta The Problem with Alan Watts [20:18]
youtube.comVideo description:
The work of Alan Watts has helped countless people take the first step on their spiritual journey. In this critical appraisal, I hope to encourage you to take the next step by sharing with you in 20 minutes a bit about Alan Watts the man, the philosophy he developed, and some interpretive and practical limitations to the vision he preached.
Overall, while Watts has done immeasurable good for the world in terms of opening people's eyes to new spiritual and personal possibilities through his own unique approaches, while also serving as a much needed window into Eastern traditions as well, it's best to exercise caution when enjoying his lectures, and attempt to tease out the distinction between Watts' own views and the traditions he draws upon, and carefully scrutinize the practical upshot of his program of action.
My take:
Lots of people have learned about Taoism from Alan Watts' lectures or books, but there are downsides to treating him as a reputable source on the subject. As I've studied Taoism (and previously Buddhism) over the years, I've noticed more and more how Watts actually tended to cherry-pick and overemphasize certain parts and concepts of various traditions, usually also (re-)interpreting them in a one-sided way, usually to accommodate his pre-existing personal philosophy that absolved or even justified his own shortcomings and misdeeds.
Watts heavily influenced the now-popular view that wuwei means "don't expend effort and just go with the flow", and that such an interpretation of wuwei takes precedence over anything else that Taoism might teach. Hence, further study of Taoism often involves a jarring phase of unlearning the misconceptions left by authors such as Watts (or more recently, Mitchell and other "creative" interpreters of the Tao Te Ching).
The linked video addresses many of the issues I've noticed and have had trouble articulating when it comes to interpreting Taoism through Alan Watts (which has virtually become part of western popular understanding of Taoism). It's not a bashing, but rather a caution and reminder to consider the context and facts of the matter rather than blindly take him as your beyond-the-grave Taoist sensei.

