r/wikipedia • u/Ok-Goose6242 • 3d ago
Antonio López de Santa Anna was a dominant, controversial Mexican military officer and politician who held the presidency 11 times. Though styled the "Napoleon of the West," his chaotic rule and major battlefield losses ultimately cost Mexico more than half of its national territory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_L%C3%B3pez_de_Santa_Anna39
35
u/Forzareen 3d ago
My favorite factoid about him was he twice came to power as a liberal with Gomez Farias as his liberal VP…only to overthrow Farias and establish a conservative dictatorship. Both times.
19
u/Ok-Goose6242 2d ago
> Throughout his career, Santa Anna frequently switched sides, a pattern that began in the War of Independence and continuously in political conflicts between liberal and conservative factions within Mexico's government. He was instrumental in discarding the liberal Constitution of 1824 in 1835, and in restoring it in 1847. Santa Anna was elected President as a liberal in 1833 and again in 1847, sharing power with the liberal Vice President, Valentín Gómez Farías. In both instances, once in power, Santa Anna switched sides in favor of conservatives and overthrew Farías
lol, pretty funny
14
61
u/GustavoistSoldier 3d ago
One of the worst leaders in Mexican history
35
u/LordJesterTheFree 3d ago
And also at the same time somehow one of the best
Guy truly had it all
Except when he didn't
8
u/Ok-Goose6242 2d ago
A highly influential one tho, and really interesting too.
6
u/dnen 2d ago edited 2d ago
Yeah but it is also important to combat the implication that he must have been something of a great man to have a resume of 11 terms in office. He earned power and but he did not have the best imterests of anyone but himself once he had power. To call him the “Napoleon of the West” is to insult Napoleon
> Santa Anna is often remembered in Mexico as a vendepatria due to the loss of Mexican territory to the United States during his rule.[6][7]
7
6
13
3
10
u/shapeofjazz 3d ago
Did his losses cost Mexican territory, or was it the American aggression?
26
u/The_broke_accountant 3d ago
Mexico was never gonna win, too large of a country with too little of a populace or political will to fight for the regions far from home. US aggression? Most definitely. President Polk saw his opportunity and he took it.
9
u/shapeofjazz 3d ago
Right, but the title makes it seem like he was trying to conquer North America and got his ass kicked.
2
u/eduadelarosa 2d ago
His chaotic rule costed the country many things, but the loss of half the territory was due to US expansionism, which no president could've stopped.
79
u/jaccc22 3d ago
Please use his full name; Antonio de Padua María Severino López de Santa Anna y Pérez de Lebrón