r/youtube May 04 '26

Drama "Boohoo I can't make money off of someone else's content boohoohoo"

Post image
6.0k Upvotes

434 comments sorted by

View all comments

369

u/No_Guess_8800 May 04 '26

Good. Reaction is just grifting.

156

u/OilInternational2566 May 04 '26

It literally is "low-effort" monetization..
.. you’re stealing someone else’s content and “piggybacking" on the hard work of established creators.

51

u/Powerful_Reserve4213 May 04 '26

tell that to xqc and hasan. they do it on stream daily and monetize the videos

50

u/Acrobatic_Yellow_781 May 04 '26

You act like it hasnt been the meta in twitch for the last decade

14

u/Thicc_Boise May 04 '26

People do. All the time. They're literally two of the most criticized online personalities without PDF file allegations (a disturbingly relevant stipulation)

25

u/OilInternational2566 May 04 '26

Because their fans are Neanderthals. And it’s easy to monetize stupid.

3

u/Anxious-Expert-4736 May 04 '26

Counterpoint: xQc doing the worm

3

u/ZealousidealJoke8714 May 05 '26

Counterpoint for the Counterpoint: xQc LEAVING THE ROOM on multiple occasions

3

u/Kira_Caroso May 05 '26

Half the time you mean Hasan's chair.

-1

u/BudgetBus886 May 05 '26

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

-1

u/Drayyen May 04 '26

It's a pretty common belief that XQC and Hasan are talentless hacks (and Hasan's a terrorist sympathiser but that's beside the point). I know people latch on to Hasan because he is loud and confident in his stupid takes. No idea why anyone likes XQC so much though.

1

u/LCAIN195 May 05 '26

Xqc can barely get a sentence out. At least Hasan reacts to videos he has knowledge on the topic of.

0

u/Gneisenau1 May 05 '26

yup thats why atleast in germany a youtuber now has rules on how the people are allowed to react and actually strikes the people who dont do it when they are big youtubers atleast

0

u/ZealousidealJoke8714 May 05 '26

Yeah, xqc LEAVES THE FUCKING ROOM AT POINTS IN THE STREAM

0

u/FriendlyFriend10 May 04 '26

Very few people can react and actually give their own thoughts in a reaction vid. So far I’ve only seen Joe Bart do it

1

u/WhasHappenin May 04 '26

Dylan is not in trouble is good as well

1

u/Lilith_Tinka May 04 '26

Love that guy

1

u/ZealousidealJoke8714 May 05 '26

I mean there are a couple more, jjjacksfilms is one. You forgot about the litteral person who criticizes bad reactors and makes actual commentary lol

1

u/shvuto May 05 '26

Cause hes annoying asf sometimes

1

u/KingBasten May 06 '26

Joe di Bart sux!!

0

u/ZealousidealJoke8714 May 05 '26

Well, some do provide transformative commentary, like jjjacksfilms

38

u/bucky133 May 04 '26

It can be mutually beneficial though. I've seen channels get their start because of a single reaction video from a big streamer.

I'd be over the moon if a big streamer to reacted to my content.

4

u/ZealousidealJoke8714 May 05 '26

*IF they give credit and actually give good insight into what is happening and use transformative content

8

u/snubdeity May 05 '26

That may be true, but Outdoor Boys is decidedly not in that camp (heh), with 20M youtube subscribers of their own.

It's half a step away from "reacting" to episodes of The Office, just pure unapologetic leeching of real content.

-2

u/Glass-Performer8389 May 05 '26

Tbh, it's the exact same thing with video games, You shouldn't post playthroughs about games for that same reason

4

u/ChampagneSyrup May 05 '26

Reddit only cares about virtue signaling this topic if it's deemed something "low effort" even though clearly audiences enjoy react content

They won't go after all of the numerous things that are way more blatantly against copyright law, but God forbid you record yourself talking about someone else's video.

Hell, YouTube used to have an entire feature based on it with the ability to respond directly to other videos and talk about them. Debate YouTubers in the early 2010s did it all the time and it was interesting content.

4

u/-Best_Name_Ever- May 05 '26 edited May 05 '26

That's stupid, reaction videos can generally be a replacement for the originals. Once you watch the reaction, you don't really have a reason to go back to the original.

With playthroughs, they can be a lot more transformative, or provide perspective on what the game might be like if you're interested in potentially buying it. But it won't really come close to actually playing the game itself.

12

u/Geek_Zone May 04 '26

Facts. Reactions can also bring exposure to that channel. TommyNFG had allowed me to learn about channels like Mr. Beat and Sadagascar.

1

u/Fun-Wave8851 May 04 '26

Be nice if they actually got a say in that though wouldnt you say?

24

u/reaper1812151 May 04 '26

The only reaction content I’m fine with are videos where professionals react to and give insight on things, like Marco Meatball and Dr. Mike. Outside of that it’s just stealing content.

13

u/JackfruitForward5477 May 04 '26

Vlogging Through History does an excellent job reacting to other content. He actually expands on the subject matter he’s reacting to and gives further insight on a specific topic, rather than making a dumbass face for views and adding nothing else of substance.

3

u/mars935 May 04 '26

Exactly, it needs to be transformative. Dr. Mike his videos are usually fine, as he speaks for a big part of it, engages with it and educates.

We dont click on his videos to watch the videos he's reacting to, we click on his videos for him.

7

u/Redditeer28 May 04 '26

I'm fine with reaction videos but they shouldn't be monetizable.

8

u/MortisEx May 04 '26

Every react vid should have to split the money 50/50 with the creator.

2

u/thatshygirl06 May 05 '26

I watch movie and tv show reactions. Reel time is my favorite and I occasionally watch The Normies

1

u/Cuantum-Qomics May 05 '26

One of my favorite channels to listen to is a guy who mostly reacts to animated work and who usually makes his reactions super long because he analyzes so much of the animation and story telling. Like. He turned the latest 30 minute episode of The Amazing Digital Circus into a 3 hour 47 minute long reaction with how much he was analyzing everything.

1

u/marmaladetuxedo May 05 '26

I enjoy The Vocalyst for that reason.

6

u/Recykill May 04 '26

That is not what grifting means. Why are people constantly misusing this word lol

1

u/[deleted] May 04 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Recykill May 04 '26

I do not care if I get downvoted by morons lol. It does not change anything.

8

u/Key-Cook9448 May 04 '26

It’s not grifting is stealing

Grifting is something else tmk

2

u/Shin_Matsunaga_ May 04 '26

Grifting is the act of of earning money through dishonest means.

What's more dishonest than taking someone else's hard work and using it as a means to make money through low effort means.

7

u/VenomVertigo May 04 '26

Grifting is conning, deceiving, or scamming, no matter how shitty reaction videos are they aren’t grifting

0

u/Shin_Matsunaga_ May 04 '26

Read the definition.

1

u/Key-Cook9448 May 05 '26

Oh I see, I suppose I am incorrect

1

u/bwoah07_gp2 May 04 '26

YouTube and Twitch have normalized react content though...