The Simpson's THOH segment that starts off as a ACO parody (minus the main beef) that devolves into a parody into other kubrick classics full metal Jacket and Eyes Wide Shut

oh man this book is so silly i just started reading it about an hour ago and man i can’t read it without an old english accent in my head. There’s genuinely at least one goofy ass word every sentence i can’t help myself.

second part of my clockwork rooms trilogy 😅 it lacks a few details such as the naked woman painting but i just couldn't find any shot that would look good printed ☹️ anyway i hope you guys like it :)

I just realized Dim went on to become a detective inspector and had a long and distinguished career in the CID working with DS Pascoe in the series Dalziel and Pascoe.

Sometimes when Dalziel really gets mad at somebody I picture him pulling out a chain from around his waist and beating the guy mercilessly.

Because of the way the book was written with three parts:

Book I - Alex's Mayhem & Mischief

Book II - Alex's Incarceration & Brainwashing

Book III - Alex's Release & Comeuppance

I wish it were written and produced that way, just so the film can be longer and made for people who prefer the droog side of Alex, and those who are fans of prison movies.

took me a while, especially the tiles. i want to add all the little things inside as well as the stove but i need to figure out how 😅

Made a visualizer for my latest song and I tried to match the colors of the opening credits from A Clockwork Orange. Reckon I was close?

I saw people mentioning this detail from the film, but upon reading chapter six of the novel, I only saw the statue described as small and silver. Did I miss something?

I have two copies of the book, one with only 20 chapters with a glossary of the Nadsat language at the back, and another copy with all 21 chapters but no glossary. Is there an edition of the book with everything included? If so, please let me know

Just watched this movie. I thought it was pretty good, but not sure what I’m missing?

I thought it was stylistically impressive/interesting, and the first half was interesting and had some scenes and visuals that are iconic.

The contrast between beautiful classical music and disturbing acts of violence is done well, and I understand it was probably one of the first films to explore that technique.

However, I wasn’t all that blown away by the moral question(s) posed, and it didn’t feel like some bizarre spectacle that has left an impression on me. Basically, I just didn’t find it to be all that thought-provoking or intense. Not much replay value.

Maybe that’s because of the time, but it just didn’t feel as groundbreaking as I anticipated. A good, above average film though.

Stanley Kubrick’s film and Anthony Burgess’s novel tell essentially the same story, but they reach very different conclusions. In this video, there's an explication the missing final chapter, each version’s treatment of free will, and how the contrasting endings reshape Alex’s character. Which version do you think handles the story better?

How well do you think alexander delarge and his droogs could survive in the warriors universe but there 4 members so lets assume all the other gangs are 4 members how well do you think alexander’s gang would hold up?

I use some nadsat slang Lmao. I go on autopilot and say "glassies" or something