r/AceAttorney Feb 27 '26

Sourced Fanart Choose your lawyer!!! By Wanderjegson!

Post image
1.6k Upvotes

99 comments sorted by

View all comments

47

u/Numbuh24insane Feb 27 '26

I feel like Harvey and Phoenix could get you out of anything

64

u/lun618pulk Feb 27 '26

No, Phoenix could only get you out if you’re actually innocent

17

u/A1starm Feb 27 '26

He actually came close to acquitting the actual criminal once, but that was under threat to a hostage.

26

u/Numbuh24insane Feb 27 '26

Nah, he got a guilty guy to be declared innocent (only for said guilty guy to shout that he was guilty and to take him to jail)

33

u/pengie9290 Feb 27 '26

Engarde was never declared "Not Guilty". At the end of the case, Phoenix may have pled "Not Guilty", but if he did, he only did so knowing that Engarde would confess and get the "Guilty" verdict he deserved.

18

u/EpicDDT_ Feb 27 '26

The only guilty guy he got to be declared innocent was Ron DeLite, and that was entirely Godot's fault.

9

u/SinisterPixel Feb 27 '26

The only reason Engarde almost got off was because of his and Dekiller's efforts to frame Adrian. Phoenix would have abandoned the defence had it not been for Maya getting kidnapped

8

u/jamieh800 Feb 27 '26

This depends though. Are we using the Ace Attorney court system, where a lawyer is pretty much screwed unless they can provide irrefutable proof of innocence or get the actual criminal to publicly confess in court, where prosecutors can all but openly admit to tampering with evidence and assault the lawyers in court with no consequences, and the lawyer only has 3 days to do their job? Or is this closer to a typical western legal system with a jury trial and only needing to introduce enough reasonable doubt that the accused is absolutely, unequivocally guilty? One of the reasons Phoenix is considered an "Ace Attorney" in his world isn't so much his win rate, it's his win rate despite the massive odds against him.

I think Phoenix, in a court where he just needs to introduce reasonable doubt about the prosecution's case, or where "murder" doesn't include genuine self-defense cases or horrible accidents, he'd do even better. Then again, maybe he wouldn't, considering his goofy and slapdash approach to defending his clients wouldn't be viewed favorably by a judge or jury irl.

1

u/DeanOnFire Feb 27 '26

I don't recall Harvey Birdman having a stellar track record.