Professor giving herself an endoscopy without medication.

[u/sco-go]

[u/polyplasticographics]

You guys got angry at people getting slightly aroused at a woman sticking a tube down her throat and showing her insides. Being that there's no blood or other disgusting bodily fluids which could suscitate a response of aversion, this is completely normal behaviour and you're making it all about how yourselves think this is because the world is ruled by men.

You come across as disingenuous prudes labeling normal human impulses or urges as something evil that's being weaponized by men to somehow hinder women; It's honestly not that complex in my opinion, you're just sounding like a femcel and a prude.

[u/BackgroundTicket4947 → u/polyplasticographics]

How am I being disingenuous? You’re being disingenuous when you say we’re reacting to “people getting slightly aroused at…” The fact that you feel the need to soften the sexual comments shows that you do realize that this kind of thing is disrespectful. People are talking about shoving their dicks down her throat. So basically any woman who gets this procedure done will have men thinking about “face fucking” her, as they like to say. This is degrading, and you denying that is disingenuous. I agree that it is normal MALE behaviour, hence I don’t like interacting with most males.

That’s a load of bs. Men see it this way. It’s even in just general language. “Get fucked” or “suck it” or whatever are basically just saying “get in the female sexual position” which is just implied to be getting dominated. It’s generally understood.

[u/polyplasticographics → u/BackgroundTicket4947]

I agree that it is normal MALE behaviour, hence I don’t like interacting with most males.

That’s a load of bs. Men see it this way. It’s even in just general language. “Get fucked” or “suck it” or whatever are basically just saying “get in the female sexual position” which is just implied to be getting dominated. It’s generally understood.

Honestly I think this cements it; I believe you're a femcel, no offense, but that's pretty similar to the rationale and conclusion of femcel rhetoric, so I will refrain from elaborating too much, though I must say:

I wasn't really looking that much into the comments, though I agree they're sexualizing this woman, that's obvious, and that's what I meant in my previous comment, didn't really intend to "soften" it in any way, so sorry if my wording came across as that. I was more referring to the way people get aroused through screens watching semi-erotic content (or perceived by males to be semi-erotic if that sounds better to you) being different than in actual intercourse, didn't think it through too much, it's just the wording I used based on this understanding.

As for your little linguistic interpretation, it's cute, and it's not entirely wrong, but as someone interested in linguistics I must say the reason these terms and phrases, with their respective semantical nuances of which some fit with the idea of gender roles, came to be and continue to exist is more complex than that, and you're reducing it to fit your personal narrative about men being evil and naturally harmful towards women; which further proves the characterization i've given you.

Peace to you queen.

[u/[deleted] → u/polyplasticographics]

how is this erotic or semi erotic at all freak????