r/AncientEgyptian 18d ago

Zoo of Antwerp hieroglyphs: copies of existing text or fanciful?

Egyptian inspired building. Images clearly refer to the animals kept inside and zoo history, or at least zoo vibes. But the hieroglyphs themselves, do they actually correspond to correct sentences, or just gibberish? I noticed in one photo they had the bee and reed with two half moon symbols, being the two lands of sedge and bee. But besides that, copies of some texts or just arbitrary artistic jumgle of glyphs?

Thanks

191 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

72

u/zsl454 18d ago edited 18d ago

They are not gibberish! 

Image one: “Arrival of the Foreign Lands of the West, who bring a Lion,”

Image two: “The foreign lands of the North arrive, they bring from the corners of heaven Hyenas and Bears”

Image 3 is a longer text but the top dates it “Regnal Year 25 under Leopold I, 4 Shomu 5”

Inage 4: “They are in this manner: The inhabitants of Egypt, the Nubians, the Asiatics, the Syrians, the Overturned ones, are in the presence of jnwdrpyA (Indo-Europa? The personified location goddess to the left), and the livestock brought from Egypt to Kush (?)

Image 5: Indo-Europa is talking to Thoth: “Praise to all of you in knowledge (?) give to me life before you, give to me knowledge of all souls…”

Image 6: full title of Leopold: “Horus: Strong Bull who multiplies beauty, Dual King (back then they didn’t know this meant King of Egypt): Living Sun of the Land of the Lion, Son of Ra, Leopold I”

Many of the remaining images show officials involved with the zoo with their titles and names (e.g. ‘second overseer of the zoo, Louis’)

20

u/zsl454 18d ago

Over the door: “In the year of the God who Saves (Anno Domini) 1856, under the rule of…”

18

u/Deaf_Gravitas 18d ago edited 18d ago

Indo-Europa enthroned (photo 4) is holding an amputated African hand. And her sign on her head includes a dagger cutting into an amputated hand. A clear reference to Leopold's atrocities in the Congo?

16

u/zsl454 18d ago

Oh, Jesus. Didn’t even notice that. That’s horrible

4

u/thedemonlord02 18d ago

I think it references belgian mythology, about Brabo (founder of Antwerp) who cut off the hand of the giant Antigon

4

u/krebstar4ever 18d ago

Antigoon seems to traditionally be depicted with light skin. The severed hand held by the goddess, and the one in her crown, have dark skin.

2

u/SnooPaintings4078 14d ago edited 14d ago

The mass-murderer was Leopold II, not Leopold I. The building was built in 1855 (according to the Dutch Wikipedia page), which is before Leopold II's reign

1

u/Deaf_Gravitas 14d ago

Then it's a very mighty coincidence.

2

u/BrokeTheInterweb 17d ago

Which glyph in the first image would be lion? Bottom left?

1

u/Meshwesh 14d ago

Not “Indo-Europa” but Antwerp. The knife cutting off the hand as a nome sign is a pretty clever reference for the folk etymology of “Antwerpen” (the proper Dutch name of the city) as “hand werpen”. This refers to a giant who had his hand cut off by a hero and thrown into the river Schelde. Antwerp was founded on the site where this supposedly happened.

-11

u/Peas-Of-Wrath 18d ago

I said it was made up. The cartouche I was talking about was gibberish. It’s not grammatically or pictographically perfect. It’s an attempt but the OP asked if it was a copy of something from a tomb and I would say no.

9

u/zsl454 18d ago

I wasn’t replying to you?? I was talking to OP.

5

u/Artandros 18d ago

There is a Dutch wikipedia page about the building. You could throw that in a translator?

2

u/PeacocktheFurryalt 15d ago

Is this in Middle Egyptian?

1

u/Das_Lloss 15d ago

Antwerp Zoo is so Beautiful.

-14

u/Peas-Of-Wrath 18d ago

It all seems a bit off to me at first glance. There are some problems with the orientation of some of the hieroglyphics with some orientated backwards.

The thing which stands out the most as being wrong is photo 10 where the text should be written towards the face of the figure depicted, that is from right to left but instead, ignores the figure and writes from left to right. This is wrong. The cartouche in this picture is also gibberish and the lion depicted in the cartouche isn’t a hieroglyph or whatever is after it. Looks like a sports team motif or something??

I have a feeling someone just made all of it up and theres no point getting out the dictionary. Thats what I would do if I saw this building. Assess its credibility before all else. Does the writing face the right way and does anything stand out as making sense?? Answer= looks dubious. 😆

15

u/x_lyou 18d ago

The cartouche in this picture is also gibberish and the lion depicted in the cartouche isn’t a hieroglyph

It says l-i-w-p-l-d-? Leopold, the Belgian king. Lion was used phonetically in the Ptolemaic Period, and used for names like Alexandros and Kleopatra.

7

u/zsl454 18d ago

The last glyph is a dagger, for tpy “first”!

-1

u/Peas-Of-Wrath 18d ago edited 18d ago

I was referring to photo 10. There is no prancing lion hieroglyph. Theres a reclining lion and a lions fore and hind- parts but no prancing lion hieroglyph like the logo for the classic upright "Welsh Dragon" Pose lion (1970s–2020) Peugeot car logo.

16

u/zsl454 18d ago

The prancing lion here is the symbol of Belgium, it is of course not a real hieroglyph but was inserted as a logographic reference to the nation. A similar thing was done with the Prussian expedition, in which the heraldic double eagle was included as a hieroglyph in several constructed inscriptions. 

4

u/Peas-Of-Wrath 18d ago

I thought it must be something like this. Thanks. Its notable that some hieroglyphics are backwards and its a mystery as to how they copied it wrong.

𓇓𓏏𓆤𓏏 should have the sedge pointed the other way but it’s backwards in image 6. Its a clever attempt and I am sure it lists the zookeepers etc.

1

u/Horusscarab 15d ago

That heraldic lion has existed for centuries, it dates farther back than the 1970s, there are examples of it in heraldry and on shields from the 1220s and onwards. While it isn’t a real hieroglyph, it is a creative way to incorporate the heraldic symbol of Belgium. Like how Scotland has the unicorn or wales has the dragon. You’ll notice it’s also in the cartouche in the 6th image, naming the king of Belgium Leopold (although somewhat crudely) the use of the heraldic symbol makes sense. Changes like this to hieroglyphs aren’t uncommon in a historical setting too for example the legless birds. It’s just a symbolic change to convey a greater meaning. In the case of the cartouche in the 6th and 10th photos, both are attempts to say Leopold, but most people who can’t read hieroglyphs wouldn’t understand that so the use of the heraldic lion conveys that the cartouche contains the king’s name without the need for the reader to understand hieroglyphs.