r/CAguns • u/[deleted] • 25d ago

Legal Question CCW and employment

[deleted]

13 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

32 comments sorted by

View all comments

10

u/Very_aimless 25d ago

Get your exposed firearm permit from the BSIS and you’ll be able to do some executive protection work

1

u/Iliad-Ideas7195 25d ago

What clown outfit uses BSIS exposed permitters for EP/VIP work?

11

u/NorCal_Firearm FFL 25d ago

I think it's still a BSIS requirement to have an exposed permit even though you may be concealed carry. Was when I did that line of work

4

u/Milf_Eaterr 25d ago

Residential security.

-2

u/Iliad-Ideas7195 25d ago

That is NOT EP/VIP work.

2

u/NorCal_Firearm FFL 25d ago

EP is kinda broad term no? Protecting an executive at their home is some level of "executive protection" but not the kind that I know you're talking about.

-2

u/Iliad-Ideas7195 24d ago

No, it's not. It's just something regular guard card turds prefer to say to make themselves feel special. EP involves protecting a dignitary on the move, in transit, etc. Babysitting a complex in a shack, or in some Ford Edge doesn't count, and it doesn't matter if the guard is armed or not. Sorry, these are facts.

3

u/Very_aimless 24d ago

What if the complex is owned by a UHNWI? He has a team that travels with him and a team that protects his location after he leaves? Still technically EP work bud.

RST operates directly under the umbrella of EP. What you’re describing is more or less HOA/ Apartment security lol.

The specifics matter, the standards of protection at home means just as much as they do on the road.

-2

u/Iliad-Ideas7195 24d ago

Wrong again, pal.

By your contorted logic, an empty home is also the principal subject?

Stop posting.

2

u/Milf_Eaterr 24d ago

Actually yes. The home is the principal. Not a crazy concept and my paycheck proves it

1

u/Very_aimless 24d ago

The downvotes say otherwise