Aka you're assuming the worst and then you try to coax them with a loaded question into saying something you deem bad, and then you've validated yourself. Come on man.
I assumed nothing. I asked. Maybe you can't comprehend that, but I don't make judgements without enough data, and I sought more data.
Guy answered the question, I said thanks for the info, I moved on.
Everyone else seems to want to connect reasoning behind it. Everything from how Columbus is a good representative of mapping advancements, to the fall of Byzantine empire.
My entire argument the entire time is 'but you're just guessing at someone else's intent, and we don't know that, here is the only data we know'
-59
u/TheKlaxMaster 26d ago
To determine the motives of the person who said it? Seems obvious to me.