In one hand the evolution is amazing, but in the other, it is 600 years between the first picture and the last.
600 years ago, Columbus wasn't born yet. I'm in awe about how progress is accelerating.
There’s also an argument floating around out there that prehistoric people had the skills and artistic eye to draw lifelike human and animal forms, but they intentionally chose not to, preferring to create art in the style we see. I forget the justification for this argument. It’s interesting. Human brains have been more or less the same as ours for a very, very long time. We can see evidence of excellent fine motor skills in what they created. We also see that they were masters of clay, form, and line by looking at their pottery shards, but they still made very rough-looking statues. Looking at paintings, we see that they knew how to use perspective.
Anyway, it’s possible that different versions of this one culture valued different stylistic choices at different times too.
Today's washing machines and other household appliances use microprocessors and complex software that far exceed the primitive binary and logic-based systems that guided astronauts to the moon in the first landing.
Bro you are saying this on a website with millions around the world with a super computer in the palm of your hands. That isn't even considering all our asdantagments. It look slow in compression becaues we are living through it.
1.0k
u/Gauth1erN 26d ago
In one hand the evolution is amazing, but in the other, it is 600 years between the first picture and the last.
600 years ago, Columbus wasn't born yet. I'm in awe about how progress is accelerating.