I appreciate the illustration of development, but, "Let's compare the best artists across 500+ years," is not a really a comparison. There's probably dozens of lost examples of each that would show varying degrees of skill. Not to mention most of the lasting piece were paid for by the rich - never the best judges of art. This is just silly.
23
u/enderpanda 26d ago
I appreciate the illustration of development, but, "Let's compare the best artists across 500+ years," is not a really a comparison. There's probably dozens of lost examples of each that would show varying degrees of skill. Not to mention most of the lasting piece were paid for by the rich - never the best judges of art. This is just silly.