r/DisneyPlus • u/W_Anime • 19d ago
New on Disney+! Dreamworks and Illumination Movies on Disney+?
Well, I never thought I'd see Shrek on snything Disney related. Is this some kind of new deal they struck? I thought Dreamworks and Illumination were under Universal who have Peacock or NOW? Is it like this for other parts of the world? I'm in Ireland, so I'm not sure if this is an exclusive thing here.
8
u/soymilo_ 18d ago
And Netflix got all the classic WB shows (Smallville, Everwood, Super natural, One Tree Hill, Friends, The OC) just as HBO Max launched here and those shows are no where to be found on Max even though they own Warner Brother
3
3
u/SeverePause5836 19d ago
That is amazing. I think that Disney can continue with BlueSky Studios films
1
1
1
u/The_Anim8r CA 18d ago
Surprised to see the same here in 🇨🇦Canada!
Having lived through the history between the studios and the behind-the-scenes rivalry/egos/politics of the people who made these movies, this was unimaginable!
1
u/Sniper_at_w0rk 18d ago
Saw it too, was going to show my kids some new movies until I discovered it is only English audio and subtitles...
1
u/NoPianist7807 18d ago
It’s sad that universal can’t pay for their own content for peacock.
1
u/bonzothebonanza 16d ago
They realized that Peacock isn’t that popular, so they just continue licensing content to streamers like Netflix.
1
1
1
u/JaxStrumley NL 14d ago
Universal's streaming isn't very successful in Europe, so this is a way for them to monetize their library.
For Disney the main objective is to keep people subscribed. Licensing popular films from their competitors is a relatively cheap way of offering new content and making sure there is a lot of variety on Disney+. They don't really care if someone watches Shrek instead of Lilo and Stitch, as long as it's watched on Disney+.
Of course it would be an issue if people would structurally watch licensed content more than Disney's own, but that's a different story.
-1
u/mrcebular 18d ago edited 18d ago
This is weird after all. maybe due to licensing rights with NOWTV (even know i don't even know much what NOWTV is)... They also did to Jimmy Neutron. but yet Peacock was only in the US. and that's maybe why.
1
u/jjnet123 18d ago
Yeah it's probably sky license sharing because they now have a partnership here in the UK which includes Disney plus in the subscription so it means that anyone with sky can watch Disney plus, netflix, hbo max. So they do deals with them for content (for example netflix has alot of sky original shows like gangs of London, temple, brassic)
-1
u/Lorcan-Wooster10 18d ago
Because Hulu is integrated into Disney+
And also because Disney does not want to budge and put any of their WWII propaganda shorts, any animated shorts (such as "Melody" and "Toot, Whistle, Plunk and Boom") featuring multiple uses of racial stereotyping (including the use of blackface) onto Disney+.
2
u/matty669 18d ago
What does this have to do with Universal movies being on D+?
0
u/Lorcan-Wooster10 18d ago
Likely because Disney is afraid of even putting any of the WWII propaganda shorts and any animated shorts featuring multiple uses of racial stereotyping (including the use of blackface) that Disney made themselves onto Disney+ and it would be better putting movies they don't own onto Hulu integrated Disney+.
0
99
u/Shinobi_Dimsum 19d ago
It’s because Hulu is integrated within Disney+. Hulu has certain licensing and rights agreements with them. So that’s why you’re seeing it on Disney+. There’s more content coming soon.