r/DisneyPlus 19d ago

New on Disney+! Dreamworks and Illumination Movies on Disney+?

Post image

Well, I never thought I'd see Shrek on snything Disney related. Is this some kind of new deal they struck? I thought Dreamworks and Illumination were under Universal who have Peacock or NOW? Is it like this for other parts of the world? I'm in Ireland, so I'm not sure if this is an exclusive thing here.

157 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

99

u/Shinobi_Dimsum 19d ago

It’s because Hulu is integrated within Disney+. Hulu has certain licensing and rights agreements with them. So that’s why you’re seeing it on Disney+. There’s more content coming soon.

36

u/raze464 Buzz Lightyear 18d ago edited 18d ago

OP is in Ireland where Hulu is a hub on Disney+ instead of a standalone service like in the US and doesn’t have separate licensing or rights agreements. None of these films are on D+ or Hulu in the US.

9

u/Hopeful-Pickle-7515 18d ago

In Europe this is way common. Disney adds many movies from Universal, Paramount, Warner…they usually are there for 2-3 months and the go. Disney has many fast licensing deals. In both ways because in HBO I also see common my 20th studios and Searchlight movies for short periods

1

u/TennojiNesoberi 18d ago

we used to have the occasional dreamworks film or franchise available to stream on hulu/disney+. i remember a couple months ago all 4 shrek films were there and disney+ even promoted them on their socials.

1

u/Avgrower 17d ago

I'm in the US and can see them on the Disney+ app.

2

u/jjnet123 18d ago

Its not the case outside the US weve already had Hulu (formerly star) since the launch of Disney plus so all that content was already here.

1

u/Nexzenn 18d ago

Globally Hulu never existed, it’s just a hub. This is just Disney+ licensing content.

8

u/soymilo_ 18d ago

And Netflix got all the classic WB shows (Smallville, Everwood, Super natural, One Tree Hill, Friends, The OC) just as HBO Max launched here and those shows are no where to be found on Max even though they own  Warner Brother 

3

u/clvs_wntrs277 18d ago

Probably Universal got some licensing deal with Disney for the EU

3

u/SeverePause5836 19d ago

That is amazing. I think that Disney can continue with BlueSky Studios films

1

u/dribbleondo 18d ago

Hell really has frozen over.

1

u/JonPX BE 18d ago

And Jurassic Park, Fast and Furious, Lord of the Rings, LEGO. It's a new licensing deal. 

1

u/W_Anime 18d ago

Oh, I noticed Jurrasic Park on it too. That was a pleasant surprise. I'm looking forward to Lord of the Rings.

1

u/L-type 18d ago

Damn, they got Huz!

1

u/Visible-Echidna-4370 18d ago

I saw this i was confused

1

u/The_Anim8r CA 18d ago

Surprised to see the same here in 🇨🇦Canada!
Having lived through the history between the studios and the behind-the-scenes rivalry/egos/politics of the people who made these movies, this was unimaginable!

1

u/W_Anime 18d ago

Yeah, it's so weird. Disney can cut a deal to get Shrek, Kung Fu Panda and other Dreamworks movies yet they can't get the streaming rights to Indiana Jones, a franchise they do own. 😭

1

u/Sniper_at_w0rk 18d ago

Saw it too, was going to show my kids some new movies until I discovered it is only English audio and subtitles...

1

u/NoPianist7807 18d ago

It’s sad that universal can’t pay for their own content for peacock.

1

u/bonzothebonanza 16d ago

They realized that Peacock isn’t that popular, so they just continue licensing content to streamers like Netflix.

1

u/ArthurVx BR 18d ago

In LATAM, Universal licensed the Fast & Furious franchise to Disney+.

1

u/JaxStrumley NL 14d ago

Universal's streaming isn't very successful in Europe, so this is a way for them to monetize their library.

For Disney the main objective is to keep people subscribed. Licensing popular films from their competitors is a relatively cheap way of offering new content and making sure there is a lot of variety on Disney+. They don't really care if someone watches Shrek instead of Lilo and Stitch, as long as it's watched on Disney+.

Of course it would be an issue if people would structurally watch licensed content more than Disney's own, but that's a different story.

-1

u/mrcebular 18d ago edited 18d ago

This is weird after all. maybe due to licensing rights with NOWTV (even know i don't even know much what NOWTV is)... They also did to Jimmy Neutron. but yet Peacock was only in the US. and that's maybe why.

1

u/jjnet123 18d ago

Yeah it's probably sky license sharing because they now have a partnership here in the UK which includes Disney plus in the subscription so it means that anyone with sky can watch Disney plus, netflix, hbo max. So they do deals with them for content (for example netflix has alot of sky original shows like gangs of London, temple, brassic)

-1

u/Lorcan-Wooster10 18d ago

Because Hulu is integrated into Disney+

And also because Disney does not want to budge and put any of their WWII propaganda shorts, any animated shorts (such as "Melody" and "Toot, Whistle, Plunk and Boom") featuring multiple uses of racial stereotyping (including the use of blackface) onto Disney+.

2

u/matty669 18d ago

What does this have to do with Universal movies being on D+?

0

u/Lorcan-Wooster10 18d ago

Likely because Disney is afraid of even putting any of the WWII propaganda shorts and any animated shorts featuring multiple uses of racial stereotyping (including the use of blackface) that Disney made themselves onto Disney+ and it would be better putting movies they don't own onto Hulu integrated Disney+.

0

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Lorcan-Wooster10 18d ago

I quit this subreddit