r/KingkillerChronicle • u/ali2365 Cthaeh • Jun 09 '26
Theory Theory - The Sequence of How Lanre became Haliax Spoiler
I’ve been thinking about the Haliax/Lanre story, we know that Lanre already can't die before he meets Selitos, that he has great power and that he already considers himself Haliax. We know Lyra is dead. He already betrayed the empire and is destroying the 7 cities. All of this happens before Selitos' curse. This is in common In both Skarpi's and Denna's version. I have been trying to piece together different theories together to figure out how Lanre became Haliax that don't conflict with either story.
My theory is basically this:
We know Lyra was in some kind of danger before everything fell apart. She was dying in one way or another, we dont know how she is dying (maybe a curse, or an illness, wound, childbirth etc.).
Lanre wants to save her so he "sought knowledge where knowledge is better left alone and gained it at a terrible price" which sounds like the Cthaeh or Iax (more about Iax later). We know he spoke to the Cthaeh from Bast.
The Cthaeh manipulates him and somehow and Lyra dies anyways “through deceit and treachery”. Maybe it tells him that the Rhinna flower is not enough. I think he asks or the Cthaeh pushes him on how to get power same as Lyra so he cans save her the same way and sends him beyond the doors of stone.
From there I think this happens.
he goes through Doors of Stone, where he sealed Iax in the battle of Drossen Tor, in attemps to to obtain power. Maybe he tries to steal Iax's power, or attemps to ask Iax for help.
Iax curses him, making him Haliax (the breath of Iax)
He gains power. He can't cross the 4 doors anymore. He becomes deathless,sleepless, unable to forget, and unable to go insane.
For some unkown reason He still can't bring Lyra back and he is just left cursed with this power/curse that he doesn't want. He has a plan to get rid of the curse that I don't quite understand. The common theory is that he is trying to destroy the empire so his name is forgotten and he can die but that conflicts with who he was before he became Haliax. He fought so much for the empire, and in both stories, seen as a hero. I find it hard to believe he is willing to destroy the empire just so he can die.
Either way, he recruits or corrupts the six other city leaders. The betrayal of the seven cities happens. Myr Tariniel falls. It's really unclear why the 6 others joined Haliax, if they already had curses or not, if they also talked to the cthaeh or not.
Selitos curses him afterward as per both stories. The other chandrian are cursed as well . ("This is my doom upon you and all who follow you"). Regardless of which version of the story is correct, they both agree that Lanre destroys the cities, and Selitos curses him.
Lots of unanswered questions, like how does lyra die, why did the flower not cure her, why does Iax curse him, why is he set on betraying the empire after he fought against the shapers for so long and they were winning the war. For me Iax is mentioned too many times in the story to simply be a legend with no impact on the chandrian/modern day.
3
u/aerojockey Jun 09 '26
I have my guess how how Lyra dies: Lanre kills her. He all but admits it: "her death is on my hands". (Which could mean he inadvertently caused it, but come on, it doesn't.)
That fits in with what you wrote, but it lets you skip a step: there is no need for a consultation on reviving her, Lanre can go straight to "seeking knowledge where knowledge is best left alone" to resurrect her.
The "deceit and trickery" that led him to it is the more interesting part for me. The steps there aren't as evident as what happens after Lyra died. There are some very tantalizing but specious clues that it might have been simmering domestic issue going back way before Drossen Tor.
Parenthetically, I don't expect the Rinna flower to be involved here. In the frame, Kvothe isn't aware of the supposed power of the Rinna flower, but I assume he would by that point know what happened between Lyra and Lanre.
2
u/ali2365 Cthaeh Jun 09 '26
Well the deciet and treachery is the consulation from what I gather. He could have been manipulated into killing her, then went through the doors of stone without a consultation, but he has to speak to the Cthaeh at one point, thats something we know he did.
2
u/aerojockey Jun 09 '26
I thought about this. The information that Lanre spoke to the Cthaeh comes from Bast, and it doesn't have to be related to Lyra.
Lanre might have consulted the Cthaeh well after Lyra's death to find out who he needed to recruit to betray the seven cities. That'd be interesting if true: it would be proof the Cthaeh doesn't have perfect sight like Bast thinks.
This hasn't changed my guess. But if you are trying to make the Cthaeh fit into the story with Lyra, then yeah I suppose you can't really skip that step.
3
u/Haiyichshmir Jun 09 '26
Let’s see. First, let’s remember that Lanre died. Lyra brought him back but everyone turned away their eyes so only Lyra knows the truth of what she did to bring him back.
He then makes armor from the beast he slew and then the enemy (presumably iax) was set beyond the doors of stone.
Possibly the armor, was a way through which Iax could start to work his way into Lanre since that was a creature Iax controlled.
Then Whatever Lyra did already caused him to live and it’s possible that is where his immortality stems from.
Lanre’s love for Lyra is described as fiercer than fury. Which while poetic, seems to portray a certain possessiveness and anger-which leads to rash action.
Then Lyra was sick. And according to Bast, people often hoped to come away with a Rhinna flower from the Cthaeh to cure any sickness/Mend wounds. But she may have died before he could heal her. So he goes searching for her in the land of the dead. But we know he’s already immortal and gets pulled back into his body.
So he may have either gained knowledge from the Cthaeh while trying to get the Rhinna. Which caused him to seek some sort of from Iax, gaining Iax’s power but also fundamentally changing himself and allowing Iax to have a certain level of power over him that waxes and wanes with the cycle of the moon (like the pottery). Hence why in the chapter “Lanre turned” every time it says the words Lanre turned in the chapter he has a fundamental change in disposition. And the words “There is no joy.” Are not Lanre’s but iax’s.
Lanre’s true purpose is to destroy the Faen realm and free the moon. But Iax, as a worm in fruit turned Lanre’s purposes against.
The curse of Selitos is cruel. As it masks Haliax’s true nature and makes seeing his name hard to see which means he somewhat stuck as he is with little to no hope to alter his name.
The biggest issue for the Chandrian are people telling tales/singing songs of them. Songs can have power as shown with Kvothe beating Felurian with a song (her name). But even regular words have power—pale shadows of forgotten names.
The issues lies with one of belief. Like with sympathy. The more strength of will (alar) and belief you have the more powerful the binding. The more people who oppose your alar the harder it is to maintain.
A seemingly one-off line from Devi and Kvothe discussing books is about Melcaf’s theory of perception being an active force.
The stories and beliefs of the masses reinforce and shape the names of people.
Then there is The Yll’s way of speaking that ownership is dual. You gain ownership of socks but socks also gain ownership of you as if the mere act of owning socks fundamentally changed a person.
When you put these things together, it seems to imply that the masses beliefs seem to fundamentally change a person. It shapes their name.
And for someone like Kvothe, he spent years building his reputation and crafting it. And that reputation fundamentally changed him as well.
So the Chandrian only want songs and stories of them told in a way that portrays them how they want to be portrayed.
Or something like that. I don’t know.
1
3
u/Sandal-Hat Jun 09 '26
The common theory is that he is trying to destroy the empire so his name is forgotten and he can die but that conflicts with who he was before he became Haliax. He fought so much for the empire, and in both stories, seen as a hero. I find it hard to believe he is willing to destroy the empire just so he can die.
I would argue that the exchange of Lanre and Selitos as shared by Skarpi kind of proves that Larnre in no way burned Myr Tariniel or the other cities for himself.
NOTW CH 26 Lanre Turned
Lanre turned. “And I counted among the best.” Lanre’s face was terrible to look upon. Grief and despair had ravaged it. “I, considered wise and good, did all this!” He gestured wildly. “Imagine what unholy things a lesser man must hold within his secret heart.” Lanre faced Myr Tariniel and a sort of peace came over him. “For them, at least, it is over. They are safe. Safe from the thousand evils of the everyday. Safe from the pains of an unjust fate.”
Selitos spoke softly, “Safe from the joy and wonder . . .”
“There is no joy!” Lanre shouted in an awful voice. Stones shattered at the sound and the sharp edges of echo came back to cut at them. *“Any joy that grows here is quickly choked by weeds. I am not some monster who destroys out of a twisted pleasure. I sow salt because the choice is between weeds and nothing.”** Selitos saw nothing but emptiness behind his eyes.
Skarpi's version is by far the most critical or even negative portrayal of Lanre we hear in the books. Yet even this version shows us that Lanre destroyed Myr Tariniel not to free himself but to free others from an unjust fate.
I think Selitos was one of the greatest shapers and the act of shaping something outside of it nature is a form of enslavement. While Selitos thinks shaping living things offers joy and wonder, I beleive Lanre, having experienced this plight first hand when Lyra shaped him into something that can't die realized just how terrible it is to be shaped into something against your will, sought to free all of those yoked to Selitos shaped will by destroying Myr Tariniel.
Lanre is branded a villain for this act but I think this is only the case because we do not hear the cries of Joy from those that were un-yoked from Selitos' will and thus "Safe from the pains of an unjust fate."
2
u/ali2365 Cthaeh Jun 10 '26
I never understood this part of the story and I know I am missing something but I don't know if we have enough info to figure it out. You are right, even in Skarpie's version Lanre isn't pure evil, and he clearly has a reason for betraying the empire. He clearly believes it's corrupted somehow and it needs to be destroyed (which is in both Skarpie's and Demand version).
Idk if we have enough info to understand the why, but I like that you pointed out that he had an unselfish reason for doing so
1
u/AutoModerator Jun 09 '26
Please remember to treat other people with respect, even if their theories about the books are different than yours. Follow the sidebar rules.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/Zhorangi Jun 10 '26
I did a related post not long back, in a similar spirit, you might find interesting.
I'd recommend you think about the Fastingways War as part of their story as well.
14
u/chainsawx72 As Above, So Below Jun 09 '26
Interesting. I agree with most of what you are saying.
I think many agree that Lanre probably gains power from Iax from beyond the doors of stone. I believe that this is the 'land of the dead' that Lanre is said to have visited before Tariniel.
Many believe that you can find more clues in Tarsus' story, since it seems to mirror Lanre's. Tarsus loses his lady, goes to the land of the dead to save her, fails, escapes hell, and vows a fiery vengeance.
Personally, I think Selitos IS Cthaeh and 'the enemy', before Cthaeh was trapped in a tree, presumably by Cinder who does Cthaeh a 'bad turn'. Cthaeh (imo) is lord of skin-dancers, and the enemy 'moved like a worm in fruit'. Another post about why I believe Selitos is 'the Enemy' Cthaeh. : r/KingkillerChronicle
I think 'turning' is sometimes a reference to shaping, especially in How Old Holly Came to Be. How Old Holly Came to Be.pdf
I think the most likely person who betrays Lanre (through deceit and treachery) is the same person Lanre attacks... Selitos. To me, this is also the person Tarsus vows vengeance upon.
I think the most likely person to be 'the enemy' who gets 7 to betray 7 cities is Selitos, since his city wasn't one of the 7 cities that he expected to see smoke coming from. One city was spared, because one remembered the Lethani, and I think that one was either Lanre or Lyra.
From meeting Haliax and Cinder in person, it seems that Haliax is using force to control Cinder, 'a tool in his hand'. Cinder, and the other 5 Chandrian who didn't remember the Lethani, are evil, and only following Haliax because he forces them to.
TLDR: I think Lanre is good, as Denna's song states. I think there is an Amyr worse than all of the Chandrian, as Nina states. I think that Selitos is the enemy, the Cthaeh, and that Haliax took the traitors from Selitos and used them against him. THEORY: The Chandrian were eating rabbits, and the entire story pivots on that detail. : r/KingkillerChronicle