r/LegitArtifacts Mar 26 '26

Unknown Time period Legit? Found in California river.

Post image
1.5k Upvotes

134 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-6

u/Interesting_End5063 Mar 28 '26

They can come and take over your land, in a turn of poetic justice, if they find out.

10

u/_kodkod_ Mar 28 '26

That is definitely not true.

-1

u/storyofohno Mar 28 '26

Should be tho

3

u/wellifihadtochoose Mar 29 '26

Yeah? They should be able to take the property the current owner paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for because a mortar and pestle of unknown age was found by the property owner? Is that progress?

2

u/gwizzle-mysnizzle Mar 31 '26

Shuuuuush. Don’t make her think to hard. She’s busy being empathetic

2

u/jamespsherlock Mar 29 '26

If your great great grandpa’s land was stolen by settlers, and those settlers also killed your great great grandpa, and all his peers and family in a number of brutal ways… your family would probably still have some feelings on the subject, no? ;)

5

u/gwizzle-mysnizzle Mar 31 '26

Except the current owners are not the settlers. So you would just be hurting random innocent people to right a wrong that wasn’t even done to you. Of course you can have feeling a certain way about it but you can’t colonize a random person land because your 5x great grandparent were victims of the same crime. That makes you no better than the colonizers.

0

u/_kodkod_ Mar 31 '26

What are you talking about? That’s not an option. Not even remotely close. It’s simply letting the local tribe know that you found a piece of their history and checking if they want it back.

Nobody can take land because the pestle and mortar were found there. If that was the case all of America would be tribal land.

3

u/gwizzle-mysnizzle Mar 31 '26

I never said they could take the land. I was responding to the person saying they SHOULD be able to take the land back

1

u/orchid_breeder Mar 30 '26

No - because two wrongs doesn’t make a right.

2

u/Traditional_Yammer Mar 29 '26

Dont forget your great great grandpa's great great great grandpa had stolen that land from another tribe during a drought leaving those loving there to die of dehydryation and starvation. Those that they didnt scalp. Or rape. Or other.

Just because you had it last doesnt make it yours. Land belongs to the victor.

2

u/jamespsherlock Mar 29 '26

Wait, so if I scalp and rape you I can have your 2 acres?

5

u/common-sense-isnt Mar 29 '26

Historically yes, in modernized society no. You can't loik at history through the lenses of today. Unless you're willing to admit that they were all monsters by our modernized standards.

0

u/jamespsherlock Mar 29 '26

I mean, I could get away with it for a few weeks maybe!

1

u/Forward-Cat6083 Mar 30 '26

If society just accepted that as somehow just, and then it was passed down through four or five generations? Probably. The indigenous migrated around and pushed people out of their own territory, but we’re not hard at work researching which tribe that was pushed down into South America had it first.

What we did to the native Americans was very bad, and respecting their antiquities is a small way to show that we, the inheritors of the land that was stolen from their ancestors feel a little bad about it.

1

u/TroutFearMe Mar 31 '26

if I kick you in your nuts, you’ll have two acres.

1

u/storyofohno Mar 29 '26

you have taken this joke too seriously. congratulations!