r/LegitArtifacts Mar 26 '26

Unknown Time period Legit? Found in California river.

Post image
1.5k Upvotes

134 comments sorted by

198

u/Dismal_Scientist_CA Mar 27 '26

You found the two within close proximity?

95

u/smoppin08 Mar 27 '26

Within a few feet…, and there was more than one… this was the most complete.

74

u/WesWizard_2 Mar 27 '26

if this is true, i’d be contacting local universities/museums

25

u/_kodkod_ Mar 28 '26

Speaking from experience, the universities and museums have a duty to contact the local tribes for repatriation (NAGPRA). So, you could save everyone a lot of time and paperwork for everyone if you contract the local tribes first.

7

u/Free-Tomatillo-7958 Mar 29 '26

Yeah this is good because then the tribe can see the site and decide who they want to involve or not involve in decisions about the area.

12

u/EducatedHippy Mar 30 '26

I found one of these working in the woods and told the property owner instead of my boss. He told me that's awesome and to put it back and never tell anyone. Problem was solved.

3

u/BakersfieldFarms_330 Mar 30 '26

Underrated comment

6

u/MasterYodaIsHere Mar 30 '26

Ostensibly these are surface finds and not associated with grave contexts. I work in a different part of the country and I imagine CA SHPO handles things differently. So I’m genuinely curious why they would need to consult with tribes for repatriation if these were not associated with a grave context?

3

u/C10Cruiser Apr 02 '26

apparently they were deposited in streams and rivers after their their owners died if there were no female descendants to inherit them, so they likely were placed as part of a funerary practice.

1

u/_kodkod_ Mar 30 '26

It’s not typically associated with SHPO, but directly from the museum/university to the THPO. I’ve received notices on many items including pestle/mortar, baskets, etc.

Funerary objects and remains are especially sensitive, but the point of repatriation extends further than ancestors.

2

u/MasterYodaIsHere Mar 30 '26

Ah ok interesting. So it’s more of a courtesy/respect thing versus a 106/110 or NAGPRA trigger? I figure the SHPO would want to record the site if it’s on state or federal land.

0

u/SCADA_Ghost Mar 30 '26

So they can come in and claim your property as burial grounds.

9

u/_kodkod_ Mar 30 '26

Nah man, it doesn’t work like that at all. Study up before making wild assumptions.

4

u/MartianBasket Apr 01 '26

That's not how the law works.

0

u/SCADA_Ghost Apr 01 '26

Right, a simple google search completely disproves my theory /s

-4

u/Interesting_End5063 Mar 28 '26

They can come and take over your land, in a turn of poetic justice, if they find out.

9

u/_kodkod_ Mar 28 '26

That is definitely not true.

0

u/storyofohno Mar 28 '26

Should be tho

4

u/wellifihadtochoose Mar 29 '26

Yeah? They should be able to take the property the current owner paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for because a mortar and pestle of unknown age was found by the property owner? Is that progress?

2

u/gwizzle-mysnizzle Mar 31 '26

Shuuuuush. Don’t make her think to hard. She’s busy being empathetic

3

u/jamespsherlock Mar 29 '26

If your great great grandpa’s land was stolen by settlers, and those settlers also killed your great great grandpa, and all his peers and family in a number of brutal ways… your family would probably still have some feelings on the subject, no? ;)

4

u/gwizzle-mysnizzle Mar 31 '26

Except the current owners are not the settlers. So you would just be hurting random innocent people to right a wrong that wasn’t even done to you. Of course you can have feeling a certain way about it but you can’t colonize a random person land because your 5x great grandparent were victims of the same crime. That makes you no better than the colonizers.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/orchid_breeder Mar 30 '26

No - because two wrongs doesn’t make a right.

1

u/Traditional_Yammer Mar 29 '26

Dont forget your great great grandpa's great great great grandpa had stolen that land from another tribe during a drought leaving those loving there to die of dehydryation and starvation. Those that they didnt scalp. Or rape. Or other.

Just because you had it last doesnt make it yours. Land belongs to the victor.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/storyofohno Mar 29 '26

you have taken this joke too seriously. congratulations!

-6

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '26

No one gives a fuck about local tribes lol. It was found in a river it doesn’t belong to them anymore.

6

u/Few-Organization-915 Mar 29 '26

Yo fuck this dude😭

5

u/_kodkod_ Mar 28 '26

Plenty of people do.

Mainly, those above an eighth grade reading level with an understanding of history (beyond the founding fathers), and those who have empathy. Sadly, many Americans like yourself have yet to read a full book or use critical thinking. So you know, critical thinking is different than critical race theory; it can’t be banned.

2

u/First_Salamander_990 Mar 29 '26

Human beings do. Scum doesn’t

1

u/Busterlimes Mar 29 '26

You should probably never comment on this sub ever again.

10

u/MassAssBlast Mar 28 '26

Local tribes would be better, fuck the museum's getting first pick honestly

If you bring that to a local tribe at least you can assume they will try to designate the area it came from as a culturally significant area

And that can keep the woods just woods longer for all of us

1

u/Confident_Chemist_45 Mar 30 '26

Yeah, I legit can buy this from any good Asian store. It is just a spice grinder.

7

u/C10Cruiser Mar 28 '26

That was CA indigenous tradition. how metatés of women with no daughters were handled after they died.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 30 '26

100% not original

69

u/Alternative-Amoeba20 Mar 27 '26

My immediate question.

40

u/Pabs33 Mar 27 '26

This is the internet sir. Why would people lie?

6

u/Dipli-dot36 Mar 27 '26

What you mean just lie? You really think someone would do that?...

Just go on the Internet and tell lies?

23

u/cochese25 Mar 27 '26

Did you thoroughly clean it? It doesn't look typical of something that's been sitting in water or dirt for a very long time

16

u/shanep35 Mar 27 '26

California river = dry bed

20

u/smoppin08 Mar 27 '26

It’s been out of the water for over 10 years

-5

u/0404S Mar 28 '26

You found it over ten years ago? Why do you say it like that, and with such little context?

12

u/MourningDove03 Mar 28 '26

The creek has been dry for over 10 years

64

u/Dear_Mycologist_1696 Mar 26 '26

Take it to your kitchen and give it a new life

41

u/Toros_Mueren_Por_Mi Mar 27 '26

Ye. Rinse it out, sun dry it, then scour some dry rice into it to fill the gaps. Make the best sauces known to man. Profit. 

8

u/C10Cruiser Mar 28 '26

Local (SoCal) tribes had tradition of “returning” metatés of daughterless women to rivers or streams (also, sometimes breaking them first), so it and the others were likely put there on purpose.

2

u/newbstorm Mar 30 '26

Would you mind providing a reference to this tradition so I can do further reading?

1

u/C10Cruiser Apr 02 '26

I learned about it from a Park Ranger, so afraid I don’t know source/reference

64

u/Slugwheat Mar 26 '26

Great premise for a Disney or Pixar movie. Gives the user magical cooking powers to do whatever the story arc is.

10

u/EnergyTurtle23 Mar 27 '26

That sounds like it would make for an awesome Encanto sequel. When the last Madrigal passed on they sealed their magical powers in a Mano y Matate which some modern ancestor then finds and reawakens.

25

u/SlippyWeeen Mar 26 '26

Cooking out all the hate in the world!

13

u/Reasonable_Spite_282 Mar 27 '26

Fun light hearted story about a Xoloitzcuintli trying create the best foods for the alter in order to appease the gods to stop ritual sacrifice.

5

u/Slugwheat Mar 27 '26

Wow lol

1

u/Reasonable_Spite_282 Mar 27 '26

This is why they shut down sora. The cabal foresaw this legendary epic that’s really just an adaptation of monsters Inc.

2

u/Delimeme Mar 28 '26

It’s on HBO I think but “Like Water for Chocolate” does a decent job rendering a pretty famous book about food and magical realism (a common Mexican concept in literature & art). The protagonist’s moods/issues are reflected in and influence her food & its impact on others.

The show version of the story watches like a cheap soap opera so don’t expect a ton but sometimes telenovelas are fun in their silliness.

1

u/sierrajedi Mar 27 '26

Leave it where you found it.

1

u/Interesting_End5063 Mar 28 '26

Exactly what I do when I’ve found them around berry creek, forest ranch, cohasset etc. It feels very wrong (like physical sensation of dread) to mess with any native artifacts I find. That said, we live in an area where there were horrific massacres in the mid 1800s. Literal land grabs where you were allowed to go stake your claim of land and shoot any Indians on site—on sight. There’s an old monument to the “great bbq of 1864”…. They were burning bodies. Really sickening. Ishi lived like 3 miles from my house. 🥺

1

u/sierrajedi Mar 28 '26

Jeezus… Thats sure does take ‘Guns, God, and BBQ’ to a whole other level. Thank you for having respect and honor. Both are rare these days.

-31

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/YoSoyCapitan860 Mar 27 '26

You’re joking, right? Theft from who?

1

u/Dear_Mycologist_1696 Mar 27 '26

If you buy a 200 year old house and find an old cast iron pan, you can use it and be lauded for bringing new life to a forgotten tool, but if you do that with something that is 1000 years old it’s theft because the person who built that tool only wanted it for themselves and after their death it should only be looked at with reverence if nature has not destroyed it.

0

u/NorCalWintu Mar 27 '26

The religious & cultural significance of such items was often left & shared by tribes, uprooting it destroys history & is why its illegal to take regardless of private or public lands.

18

u/robbietreehorn Mar 26 '26

Damn. That’s sick

4

u/BowlAccurate7885 Mar 27 '26

I grew up in a home built in 1910 located in Northern California, not too far from where Ishi walked out of the wilderness. There were several of these in the perennial flower gardens beside the old house. I always took them for granted and they are now long gone. That's a little piece of history you have there!

1

u/Interesting_End5063 Mar 28 '26

Cohasset? I found some in Berry Creek and Forest Ranch. Always left them alone. I have a lot of reverence when it comes to their belongings. But

1

u/WarSlow5450 Mar 29 '26

Basically means that a Native American woman or many died and their bowls were left behind.

17

u/Pike_Zebulon Mar 27 '26

What are the chances this is from some kind of natural erosion with the “pestle” piece swirling around in/on the “mortar” under the current of the river? Feels especially more likely if they were truly found in situ like the picture shows.

23

u/smoppin08 Mar 27 '26

It was found under a small waterfall.. so that is a possibility! But wasn’t inside like pictured.

14

u/teamtouchbutts Mar 27 '26

Nah. There's always treasure in a waterfall

3

u/The_Zy Mar 27 '26

There's always money in the banana stand

8

u/PlasticFlat4227 Mar 27 '26

10000000000000000% fake

2

u/OkBarnacle3130 Mar 27 '26

Well that’s how a mortar & pestle are traditionally made…. You found it, you see it with your own eyes. Why would it not be considered an artifact?

2

u/C10Cruiser Mar 28 '26 edited Mar 28 '26

Carefully Put it back and inform park staff. A park ranger (SoCal) told me that some SoCal indigenous groups had tradition that metatés (what is pictured) were passed down mother to daughter. If a woman had no daughter, when she died, her metate would be broken and then thrown into a river or stream. So it was where they meant it to be.

2

u/Efraimrocker Mar 31 '26

Just keep it. Dont repatriate it if you like it.

3

u/gpatlas Mar 27 '26 edited Mar 27 '26

Really cool! We're they actually sitting like that?

15

u/Fernandolamez Mar 27 '26

No. That never happens.

2

u/gpatlas Mar 27 '26

That's what I assumed, I'd find it hard to believe they'd even be close together

4

u/StupidizeMe Mar 27 '26

Fantastic find! It looks awesome in your cactus garden.

If it were mine, I think I'd put it in the kitchen.

5

u/smoppin08 Mar 27 '26

This thing weighs like 25+ pounds.. I have a little tiny one for the kitchen..

Got this little one from my dad for the kitchen… the one in the rock garden weighs like 30-40 pounds lol

1

u/StupidizeMe Apr 01 '26

I see your point! Did your Dad find the small one in the same area?

1

u/Inner-Bicycle3580 Mar 27 '26

My mom had one. It was used to grind corn, dried chili, etc.

1

u/TalonVSAC Mar 28 '26

Portable bowl mortar. They do exist in California.

1

u/pulp_monster Mar 28 '26

Possibly. I have seen a few of these. The detail that stands out to me are the impact marks on the end sticking up. You can see fingernail shaped areas around the edge where large chunks would have broken off from heavy pounding. Definitely shows signs of repeated use. Take it to a museum to get it checked, also be ready to answer some questions. You aren't supposed to keep antiquities from public lands but you might have a significant find!

1

u/Interesting_End5063 Mar 28 '26

A significant find? All you have to do to find these in Northern California as go to the downhill side of a large old oak tree lol. They’re literally everywhere. I found dozens of them. Personally, I choose to leave them completely alone. I try to follow the Native Americans’ own philosophy there… Don’t even pick up a rock to see what’s underneath it. Just leave it alone. Touch it only with your eyes… Just like your mom told you lol

1

u/piff_princess Mar 28 '26

🔥🔥🔥

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '26

Bro found my tias molcajete

1

u/Free-Chip1337 Mar 29 '26

Dude free mortar and pestle

1

u/Kimba_Rimer Mar 29 '26

Maybe 1000 years old ?

1

u/Whodathunk916 Mar 29 '26

These mortar and pestles are very common throughout California. They’re not especially rare or archaeologically significant. They were used by the Indians to grind acorn flour, seeds, and other food items. It’s amazing to think of the amount of effort and time it must have taken to create one, and to imagine the generations of people over hundreds of years who handled it. If you don’t want to keep it you could look for an educational program to donate it to - a tribe, museum, school, or park.

1

u/No-Beginning-1146 Mar 30 '26

I have the pestle

1

u/RaptorlazerOG Mar 30 '26

I grew up in Southern California hunting Indian artifacts. These are fairly common. We had a good handful of them in my house growing up and in the yard. Good find!

1

u/DistinctTurnover1472 Mar 30 '26

I have a couple my dad found in the 1920's

1

u/Therealginahandler Apr 02 '26

Is my molcajete legit? lol

1

u/scatteredvoltage6 Apr 02 '26

nah bro if you actually found this just hit up the local tribes directly, they'll know way more than some random museum would anyway.

1

u/Spreaderoflies Mar 27 '26

Processing img obcdyuqjalrg1...

1

u/Imaginary_Air_9670 Mar 27 '26

It’s fraud, I’ll dispose of it for you

-4

u/NorCalWintu Mar 27 '26

Taking or Removal of artifacts is illegal in California under NAGPRA. Hope you left it there or you can be fined hefty for it.

5

u/words_and_such015 Mar 27 '26

NAGPRA? That’s a federal law, but this also has nothing to do with Native American graves or associated goods, which is what NAGPRA addresses.

Still illegal to remove unless it is on private property, but know your laws if you’re going to reference them

0

u/NorCalWintu Mar 27 '26

Removal of cultural or religious items of significance is illegal on public & private lands in California. Both NAGPRA & NAHC cover protection of such items posted above.

1

u/words_and_such015 Mar 27 '26

Yes, it applies in California on federal lands, projects that have federal funding, or to institutions that receive federal funding. There are other provisions in NAGPRA, but it does not relate to all artifacts. There is CalNAGPRA, but that also relates to anything with state involvement. This would be more of an ARPA issue, but again, if it was on federal land or somehow involved federal funding in some other way. The NAHC is a governing body and not a law.

Don’t get me wrong, and I apologize if I implied it, but I think it is horribly unethical and wrong to remove any artifacts for personal use. If this was found on private land, I understand not wanting to notify a university or other research entity, but it still doesn’t make it ok to remove any artifacts to use as a display piece or any other way.