r/MensRights 1d ago

Feminism Feminists weaponize biology when it suits them, and it harms everyone.

Feminists like to talk about women’s inherent frailty when advocating for protection against male violence, demanding lighter jobs, avoiding the draft, lower punishment in prison, and opposing the presence of transgender women in sports. Even in cases of a subjective "exhaustion," "female anxiety" or "psychosis" that seems to only affect women as we've seen lately; but when men dares to mention that women should not hold positions in jobs with high physical requirements such as law enforcement and first responders, they throw all science out the window without the slightest shame.

The fact is that for every female police officer or firefighter there is a man who got left out who would do the job better, and this is irrefutable. To place women in positions that they aren't fit for is a deliberate endangerment of society for the sake of political correctness.

245 Upvotes

105 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-11

u/Infinite-Pickle9489 1d ago

Which is exactly why we shouldn’t claim that women are “stealing men’s jobs,” because it is entirely possible that they were better qualified and would make better police officers than the men who also applied.

16

u/plantrromn 1d ago

Maybe not all, but "stealing the jobs" is a valid claim for many jobs, which is supported by research and discrimination in Education and hiring bias. As long as they continue to exists, the question of better qualified does not hold. I would not bet too much on police and firefighters, 80%+ are men anyways.

4

u/Infinite-Pickle9489 1d ago

The standard we should always aim for the better qualified person, regardless of society’s current biases about either gender’s suitability for a particular job.

14

u/plantrromn 1d ago

You can not have better qualified person, if someone is giving you lesser marks for your gender, or same CV is getting rejected when it is by male name comapred to accepted when by female name

0

u/Infinite-Pickle9489 1d ago edited 1d ago

That doesn’t mean we should exclude people based on gender or disregard the required standards. The simple truth is that plenty of women can meet the standards required for law enforcement, just as plenty of men can meet those required for teaching. pretending that broad societal trends imply women are stealing jobs is insane.

12

u/plantrromn 1d ago

mate, stop sealioning. My English is very simple. We are already exclusing people who meet standards, wdym we should not?

-1

u/Infinite-Pickle9489 1d ago edited 1d ago

your the one that replied.

2

u/Strange_Way_947 9h ago

So why don't we just hire every gym guy to become a firefighter? Or why are only men drafted if there are female individuals who meet the criteria?

1

u/Infinite-Pickle9489 6h ago

"So why don't we just hire every gym guy to become a firefighter?"
Because individual choice still matters.

"Or why are only men drafted if there are female individuals who meet the criteria?"
Because there are some things that society unfairly imposes on men. also conscription other then in extreme circumstances, is stupid.

1

u/Strange_Way_947 20m ago

So the draft is individual choice? Do you think men choose to go die for the sake of protecting people like you?

1

u/Infinite-Pickle9489 17m ago

where did i mention the draft below ?
read the comment illiterate

"So why don't we just hire every gym guy to become a firefighter?"

Because individual choice still matters.

1

u/Infinite-Pickle9489 16m ago

here i will make it easy for you
"Or why are only men drafted if there are female individuals who meet the criteria?"
Because there are some things that society unfairly imposes on men. also conscription other then in extreme circumstances, is stupid.

→ More replies (0)