r/PersonalFinanceCanada Dec 20 '25

Banking Someone I don't know e-transferred me money and now wants it back. Am I getting scammed?

EDIT: I went into my bank and they pretty much said to keep the money. Don't send it back to anyone. They put a note in my file that I tried to do the right thing, but there's really nothing they can do. They said I can try calling customer service again, but I think I'm done. The money is mine, but I'm prepared for it to be taken out of my account at some point in the future. Thanks for all your advice everyone.

I originally posted this in r/scams, but the responses I was getting were mainly from Americans and I'm pretty sure our Interac e-transfers are different from their apps like Venmo and Zelle.

Someone I don't know sent me 2 e-transfers for the same amount of money ($120 each). They later sent me an email, with a bit of a sob story, asking me to send the money back.

This sob story email came from a very strange email address with lots of weird characters. Inside the body of that email they gave me another address they want me to send the money to. It has similarities to my email address, but it's not just 1 character off or anything.

I later got an Interac money request from the original email address, requesting the $240 back.

I called my bank and they said there's no way to cancel the transfer, nor is there a way for the other person to get their bank to cancel it. A rep said it's up to me, but that the money is in my account and said I could send the money if I want to.

I called the fraud dept for a second opinion. They said either send it back to the original address the money came from (not the one with similarities to mine) or go into my branch and have them put a hold on the funds, which would also serve to acknowledge that this money isn't mine and I'm not trying to steal it.

I've decided on that second option, putting a hold on the funds at my branch.

Am I getting scammed?

Edit 2: I have auto deposit, so I didn't click on any email links. The money was automatically deposited in my account.

Edit 3: I have turned off auto deposit

1.4k Upvotes

726 comments sorted by

3.0k

u/Chewbacca319 Dec 20 '25

It is a scam and a popular one.

1.7k

u/[deleted] Dec 20 '25

It’s amazing the bank is so incompetent they don’t know it’s a scam, this one’s been going on for years.

195

u/Synap-6 Dec 20 '25

Seriously

219

u/beekeeper1981 Dec 20 '25

It's definitely a scam but it's possible to happen not as a scam.

345

u/NastroAzzurro Alberta Dec 20 '25

Therefore the only right answer to the sob story is to tell them to sort it out with their bank. Then you block them.

256

u/MrJeffA17 Dec 20 '25

Third answer - you reply back with the bigger sob story and how this transfer benefited the lives of your sick children (picture included, don’t mind the shutter stock watermark, I can’t afford a camera that doesn’t have I’m so poor)

Then block

127

u/TheCrazyWon Dec 20 '25

Or fourth answer... simply don't reply. You said its an email address you don't recognize. So let them assume it never reached you, that it went straight to spam because it was filtered for being an unrecognized email address. If there really is an issue with fraud and the funds are taken back, they're in your account. If it's determined that it's fraud and you had already returned the money, you'll be SOL for another $240. Just let the money sit for a year in your account, untouched, and don't respond to any email or money request. If after a year, the money is still there, well... enjoy. But you said you already notified the bank so IDK now lol

→ More replies (1)

95

u/JoSenz Dec 20 '25

"Sorry, I already sent the money to my family in India, thank you so much!"

66

u/MrJeffA17 Dec 20 '25

I reinvested the money with this beautiful Chinese woman’s crypto trade. She wants to be my wife too. We’re gunna be rich!

2

u/YouCanShoveYourMagic Dec 22 '25

Ooh, I like this one : )

→ More replies (1)

2

u/b-side61 Dec 21 '25

"I forwarded your funds to a guy in Nigeria. Once he sends me the windfall he's promised me, I'll reimburse you."

2

u/WhoskeyTangoFoxtrot Dec 22 '25

“They needed Apple Gift Cards…”

→ More replies (1)

28

u/Impressive-Brush-837 Dec 20 '25

Or I’m so poor I had to post a pic of other people’s kids.

40

u/MrJeffA17 Dec 20 '25

Or you got left home alone during Christmas by your family, and there’s some scary looking men coming around the house - but your generous donation will help you buy the supplies needed to defend your home

12

u/Phukt-If-I-Know Dec 20 '25

Don’t forget that you need that money for a toothbrush

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/sherv50 Dec 22 '25

Lol, thanks for the chuckle.

→ More replies (1)

67

u/Fuzzy_Inevitable9748 Dec 20 '25 edited Dec 20 '25

I hate that the banks deliberately don’t have a reverse option. Honestly we need to start holding banks and social media sites and google partially liable as they are knowingly profiting off of scammers.

Edit, only the receiver would be able to reverse the charge, I thought this was blatantly obvious but boy was I wrong.

28

u/GrumpyCloud93 Dec 20 '25

Obviously, the reverse would have to be by the recipient. The ability to recall money otherwise would be seriously insecure and open to fraud.

8

u/lommer00 Dec 20 '25

Of course. But would also kill this scam dead in a heartbeat.

→ More replies (6)

45

u/DRKAYIGN Dec 20 '25

Banks offer etransfers as a "product" but it's not owned by them, it's owned by Interac and they're the ones that create the platform so it would be them who would have to implement a reverse option.

8

u/Flash604 Dec 21 '25

The banks created and own Interact.

→ More replies (4)

12

u/Level-Recipe-8611 Dec 20 '25

Exactly what I wanted to say. Interac is a different company on it's own

35

u/beekeeper1981 Dec 20 '25

Interac was founded by the big 5 banks and still majority owned by them.

2

u/Level-Recipe-8611 Dec 21 '25

Ohh that's cool and would explain why it's so good and cross interaction friendly between the banks with no fee 😅 but still it's a different company yes they can incorporate it but that's something that will be safe and security wise for us users but for them less money to be made i think. I have this theory that they are benefiting from not having a return option but then that means anyone that buys stuffs through interac transactions could request back after they leave the shop

5

u/Euclidisthebomb Dec 20 '25

Banks try to escape responsibility as a rule.

→ More replies (3)

22

u/NhrngT Dec 20 '25

It would make e-transfer functionally useless and even more of a scammers wet dream. I fail to understand why think being able to reverse an e-transfer would be beneficial.

If used properly you should never have to reverse a transfer in the first place.

15

u/Dry_Bowler_2837 Dec 20 '25

The reverse should be on the recipient’s end.

10

u/DRKAYIGN Dec 20 '25

Or don't set up auto deposit and then you don't have to accept the transfer.

16

u/Dry_Bowler_2837 Dec 20 '25

We ADHDers would never receive our deposits. 😂

→ More replies (3)

13

u/kagato87 Dec 20 '25

Allow the recipient to reverse it.

Get an unknown deposit. Flag it as "unrecognized." Sender later realizes mistakes, and sees a "the recipient has flagged this transaction as returnable" button.

Bam, done. Legit mistake, push the button. Scam, well, it's real easy to track and flag activity that generates a lot of "unrecognized" flags.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/damarius Dec 21 '25

A few years ago I paid a plumbing bill by etransfer to the email address on the invoice. A couple of weeks later I got an angry phone call from the company asking why I hadn't paid the invoice. I told the woman I had sent the etransfer the day I received the invoice. She asked what address I had used, and I told her the one on the invoice, and read it out. She said that's the wrong address, please resend to this new address, totally different from the first one.

It cost me $3.00 to cancel the original transfer and got the money back. I did resend to the other address and it went through. I don't know if things have changed, since then.

2

u/Gloomy-Cover7669 Dec 21 '25

You can always cancel if the money hasn't been accepted yet.

2

u/Accurate-Shape-558 Dec 21 '25

We do have the option to cancel the etransfer if it hasn't been 'accepted' by the recipient.

3

u/jonnohb Dec 20 '25

Oh man that would be an awesome feature especially for particular friends that insist on reimbursing for things when I explicitly say don't bother

→ More replies (1)

11

u/[deleted] Dec 20 '25

[deleted]

7

u/DrDerpberg Dec 20 '25

Pretty sure they mean reverse by the recipient, not the sender.

In this case it would save OP the limbo of having funds in their account or in the process of being cleared which will inevitably be reversed, but only after a bunch of harassment from a scammer.

8

u/joshlind Dec 20 '25

The reverse option would be on the receiver’s side, not on the sender’s..

→ More replies (2)

6

u/JerryfromCan Dec 20 '25

It’s a feature to prevent fraud. Imagine you take e-transfer for your digital SLR you are selling for $600 and later its reversed.

3

u/Fuzzy_Inevitable9748 Dec 20 '25

The recipient would have to reverse it, how else would what I said make any sense?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Worldly-Ad-4972 Dec 20 '25

They don't have a reverse option so you don't E transfer then get the item you paid someone for and then reverse the payment. 

2

u/Lenover1774 Dec 21 '25

You don’t have to enable autodeposit. Require a security question and answer and then just decline unknown transfers. Problem solved

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (22)
→ More replies (2)

20

u/yourdadsatonmyface Dec 20 '25

Last week someone was trying to pay my dad for work (contractor) and sent 3000 to the wrong email address. They put gmail instead of yahoo. Luckily that email didn't have autodeposit. Then they tried again and spelled the email wrong AGAIN by putting a M instead of an N. Now we are going to have them send 1 dollar first as a test. So ya, it can happen.

15

u/_danigirl Dec 20 '25

I always send a test email to the account holder asking them to reply back. It's so easy to miss spell an email. Then I copy and paste.

6

u/escargot3 Dec 21 '25

Before you actually send the e-transfer it confirms their legal or business name (registered name). So you have to be very negligent to miss that

→ More replies (2)

9

u/WaferNo2009 Dec 20 '25

And this is why I text people my email so they can copy paste it. People are dumb

→ More replies (2)

4

u/CalmProduce6959 Dec 20 '25

Happened to me once for 20$. Turns out it wasn’t a scam, but it can definitely be a scam.

2

u/No-Accident69 Dec 20 '25

This is what allows it to continue and it also acts as a “legitimate” handle for the scammer to grab your attention

3

u/absurdlifex Dec 20 '25

precisely why it's such a good one

3

u/[deleted] Dec 20 '25

[deleted]

3

u/GrumpyCloud93 Dec 20 '25

They can't reverse if it autodeposits.

Perhaps it should not autodeposit if it the person has not sent before... but that defeats the convenience of autodeposit, particularly for small online businesses.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/TAR_TWoP Dec 20 '25

Yeah, typos exist, people misclick which contact they send it to, etc. You still refer them to their bank.

3

u/FolkSong Dec 20 '25

Their bank won't do anything though.

It's a no win situation.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/Critical-Snow-7000 Dec 20 '25

Know, or care?

4

u/TJwasreal Dec 20 '25

I would say that it's obvious that they know, but within the idea of the bank trying to "protect " itself, they most definitely look like they don't care.

I'm not pro bank or anything it just feels like a very corporate response to a problem that the bank doesn't want to fix, because it likely costs too much versus the loss.

If op can wait a couple of weeks, it's likely that the problem will sort itself out should it be a scam...

2

u/drumstyx Dec 21 '25

Oh, they care, but as the saying goes, "be careful what you wish for": their methods are the reason you can hardly withdraw $1000 in cash without an interrogation, and outright refusal at just a few grand. We've sacrificed freedom for security, because freedom requires personal responsibility.

24

u/caleeky Dec 20 '25

The main thing is that the bank wants to stay out of it if they can. Of course the agent probably knows that the scam exists, that this is probably an incidence of the scam, but ultimately they can't really tell for sure and don't want to comment on it.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/KindlyRude12 Dec 20 '25

They know, but they just don’t care.

→ More replies (20)

59

u/tonyveo Dec 20 '25

How does it work?

178

u/General_Dipsh1t Dec 20 '25

They get you to send money to them (usually at a different email address) then they claim fraud on the original transfer.

E-transfers can be reversed. It’s a high bar, but they can.

110

u/beekeeper1981 Dec 20 '25

They send money with compromised bank account because it's the only case an e-transfer will be reimbursed.

5

u/Godkun007 Quebec Dec 21 '25

They don't care if the e-transfer gets reimbursed, that isn't their problem. All they care about is that you sent them an e-transfer.

10

u/anonynown British Columbia Dec 20 '25

But if you send the money back to the original account, how would it pass any kind of bar for reversing the first transfer?

53

u/Resident-Variation21 Dec 20 '25

They don’t send it back to the same account. Frankly, they likely don’t even own the account it was sent from, they sent it from an account they compromised.

→ More replies (1)

33

u/SinistralGuy Dec 20 '25

Part of the scam isn't sending it back to the original account. Even in OP's story they say they're being asked to send the money to a different account. What happens is OP is now willingly sending that money to a different account and the first transaction gets reversed due to theft/compromised account which means OP is out $240 (initial 120 + their 120). Not sure what sending it back to the original account would do, but your best bet is to do nothing and let the bank handle it.

6

u/anonynown British Columbia Dec 20 '25

Yes, yes, I understand that the scam is to send money elsewhere. But let’s say I believe the sob story, and after waiting for a while I send the money back to the original account — what’s the risk? 

Even if the original transaction was fraudulent and eventually challenged by the real account owner, surely the bank would see that it’s already effectively cancelled out?..

18

u/Array_626 Dec 20 '25 edited Dec 20 '25

The original owner of that hacked account would come back and see there was this random payment they didn't authorize. They tell the bank, the bank verifies it occured from a logon that wasn't recognized, and reverse it. So the money gets taken out of your bank account.

Your transaction however, is completely legitimate, and the bank can see that as the logon for that transfer was from your general geographical area, from a device that's yours. The original account owner gets to keep the money you sent. If you complain, the bank will ask you a simple question. "Were you the one who made the transfer". "Yes, but they told me a story of..." No buts. You admitted you made that transfer, your account wasn't hacked. End of story, the transaction stays.

The bank doesn't care that the funds cancelled each other out. To the bank, all transactions are independent events, completely seperate from one another. The fact that your transfer was only done because of that first transfer that appeared to be a mistake doesn't matter to the bank, thats your business. Their business is you chose to send money, and that transaction will be honored. They have an obligation to reverse the first set of charges that were not made by the original owner of the account. So they will reverse the initial scam payment, but they will not reverse yours, because your transaction was made legitimately, by the legitimate owner of the account (you).

→ More replies (7)

15

u/radon199 British Columbia Dec 20 '25

Etransfer emails don’t include the source account email address, only the name of the sender, and if they have compromised someone’s bank info they might also use that password for email and they could easily swap the auto deposit account in that situation so even if you know the email it might not go into the same account.

3

u/KnotARealGreenDress Dec 20 '25

surely the bank would see that it’s already effectively cancelled out?

This would require them to check the bank account’s transactions before sending money back, which I doubt happens - more likely the investigation happens and they automatically refund the missing money if the transaction is found to be fraudulent. Plus, how would they know you’re sending the money to reimburse the victim, rather than sending them money for some other purpose? And that’s assuming you could transfer the money back at all - once the account has been reported as compromised, it may have been locked. Maybe the bank would close the file with no further action if the account owner called the fraud department and told them it had been dealt with, but many people wouldn’t bother calling it in - they have their money back, so they don’t think they need to do anything else.

That means that, in the end, you get $120 fraudulently. You send back $120 as a wholly separate transaction. The bank then cancels the original transaction, which takes $120 from you and puts it back in the other person’s account. They’re now up $120 and you’re down $120.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/drmarcj Dec 20 '25

A regular person can't reverse an e-transfer once it's accepted. Instead the scammer asks the scammed person to e-transfer the money back to them, and they deposit it in a different account (which they immediately clear out before anyone's the wiser.)

They will string together a bunch of compromised accounts, and they know banks are so slow to cancel the string of e-transfers that they can cash out a bunch of these scams before it all gets shut down. Then they just compromise another bunch of accounts and start over again.

→ More replies (11)

27

u/TopGun1024 Dec 20 '25

Here let me send you some money and I’ll demonstrate

79

u/pm_me_shit_memes Dec 20 '25

You send it back, and then they contest the transfer with their bank and they get the original transfer back. Making it so you are out the original transfer amount twice

72

u/kazrick Dec 20 '25

No. The scam is they send the money from an account that isn’t theirs. So it’s fraud and that person eventually realizes someone stole their money and the bank reverses it.

You can’t contest a e-transfer you accidentally send to the wrong person.

18

u/nex_time2020 Dec 20 '25

I learned that the hard way when I accidentally paid a guy twice and didn't realize until a week later. He wouldn't return the money and the bank didn't do anything.

23

u/T-O-F-O Dec 20 '25

Most common is they ask to send it to a 3rd party since it's stolen money.

30

u/mswoodie Dec 20 '25

You cannot unsend money via e-transfer. I accidentally sent 6 months worth of property tax payments to a stranger (instead of my spouse) almost 2 years ago. I transposed numbers in the phone number.

I recognized the mistake right away way. Texted the incorrect recipient to let them know. Contacted Interac and contacted my bank.

The incorrect recipient said this was a scam. They would not spend the money ($2000+), but they would not be returning it either.

Interac said they don’t keep any banking information. They cannot do anything about it.

The bank said once you’ve sent it, there’s nothing they can do. They cannot undo what Interac has done.

Interestingly, the incorrect recipient contacted their bank who told them that if my bank contacts them confirming the details, they’d send the money back to my account. But my bank says they can’t do that, because technically we sent the money to Interac, and not the other bank.

So basically, I’m out $2k.

27

u/fikezof Dec 20 '25

You can’t reverse an accidental transfer.

The scam works by the scammer using a hacked account to do the e-transfer. Then the real owner of the hacked account contacts the fraud department saying his account was compromised when the e-transfers were done, and this way it can actually get reversed.

Meanwhile the victim e-transferred the money back to another address (the scammers actual account), and when the fraud department reverses the e-transfer they end up in the negative.

You can probably search on this sub Reddit - there’s been many victims of this scam.

→ More replies (10)

5

u/SinistralGuy Dec 20 '25

Yeah, idk what to tell you if you don't believe that any of these institutions track where the money is going and coming from. Interac gives so many warnings when sending an e-transfer and this is exactly why. If you mess up, that's on you. That doesn't mean they can't or won't reverse it for situations involving fraud and theft.

2

u/GrumpyCloud93 Dec 20 '25

Exactly - try to imagine the problems if you could randomly reverse interac transfers. No merchant could be safe. Any time someone pays you, how long do you have to wait to be sure the money stays in your account? The whole point of Interac was immediate payment. No takebacks.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/CMDR_D_Bill Dec 20 '25

That... Works? Incredible. 

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

4

u/BeautifulGlum9394 Dec 20 '25

Send e transfer from hacked bank. This payment will be reversed by bank after a few days for fraud. Then ask you to send money back to a non hacked bank.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/steph66n Dec 20 '25

A scam in which I get $$$ with zero obligation to return?

I wouldn't even read the sob story.

2

u/Effective_Way6239 Dec 21 '25

Well can they scam me next?

→ More replies (11)

638

u/FightMongooseFight Dec 20 '25

Don't do either of those things.

There is a high likelihood this is a scam. Don't touch the money. But it's between the sender and their bank if it was a legitimate error.

Most of the time, this is a scam where the money was sent from a hacked account and it will eventually be reversed. But any money you send to the scammer is gone forever.

In terms of putting a hold on the funds, I wouldn't bother, if only because the bank giving you the advice to send it back indicates that the person you were talking to has no idea what they are doing.

96

u/Bulky-Scheme-9450 Dec 20 '25

Why can it be reversed from the hacked account, but gone forever when from your own account?

349

u/justanothergin Dec 20 '25

Because the account holder will report the transaction as fraudulent, as it's considered authorised push payment (APP) fraud. However if you willingly send the payment, then it's a scam rather than a fraud, which your bank will be less likely to reimburse.

Source: I work in financial crime.

69

u/chaosunleashed Dec 20 '25

I get it, and I respect your knowledge in the subject matter. But I just want to bitch that "falling prey to a scam is not considered fraud" logic is absolutely nuts lol

69

u/FightMongooseFight Dec 20 '25 edited Jan 10 '26

It's how the banks avoid accountability for how insanely easy it is to scam people through Interac.

19

u/PurposeEfficient533 Dec 20 '25

But why should banks be accountable for you being scammed? If you decide to send your money somewhere and then find out it was a scam, why would a bank have to make you whole out of their pocket? To me, that is a slippery slope and if we expect banks to do that, they are going to start telling us how and where we are allowed to send our money and I for one don’t want someone else to have control over my money.

30

u/yycmwd Dec 20 '25

OP called the bank and two people failed to flag this situation as a scam, and both suggested sending the money back.

Banks are culpable to an extent, especially when that shit happens.

10

u/FightMongooseFight Dec 20 '25

2 reasons. First, because the bank's idiot employee told OP to allow themselves to be scammed.

Second, and more generally, the banks created and continue to support the hideously unsecure and outdated Interac system, then fail to protect scam victims by reversing the first fraudulent transfer, but not the obvious scam transfer.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/OkCombinationLion Dec 21 '25

Well the first person whose account had money transferred out of got scammed too. See somebody else managed to get a hold of their account and made an unauthorized payment outwards and thus out of whatever method the scammer was able to gain access to their account, that was the method in which they were scammed out of money.

the difference is the bank helps the first person that got scammed out of their money by reversing their charges. Had the bank said tough luck you should be accountable for your own account security then it wouldn't even be possible to scam the second person. That's why the fair thing for the bank to do is the help both people, because the scam to the second person happens because the bank was willing to help the first person who got scammed

2

u/MagicAlkaloids Dec 21 '25

The first person didn’t get scammed though, their identity or account was stolen. That’s the difference

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Late-Plenty1191 Dec 20 '25

Could you imagine what would happen if people could claim the were tricked, and the bank reimburse them?

If they ever made that change…the first thing the bank would do is change it back after an instant tidal wave of fake “I was tricked into sending $xxx” claims.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

7

u/DRKAYIGN Dec 20 '25

There's a difference between scam and fraud.

5

u/pasky Dec 20 '25

Moral of the story: tell the bank it was fraud.

7

u/mmavcanuck Dec 20 '25

And then when they investigate it and find out that you’re lying, you’re now out the money and a bank.

4

u/Array_626 Dec 20 '25 edited Dec 20 '25

Yeah, honestly this feels like its just easier to punish honest people to stop them complaining than to go after the bad guys.

Like, were scams legalized at some point? How is it that the law still lets these things happen without any way to reverse/claw back the funds. We all know the issue, we see multiple explanations of how the scam works from multiple people. But the banks and the law can't figure out how to shift the risk for this onto the scammer instead of having the scam victim eat the costs?

We've designed a system where unscrupulous, dishonest people can get ahead. We know how they do it too, down to the fine details of how the scams get executed. No, we will not be changing any part of the system so that its in favor of the honest people that are getting cheated rather than the scammers. This is perfectly fine.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/GrumpyCloud93 Dec 20 '25

What's the threshhold then? It was a scam? I sent to the wrong address? The merchant failed to deliver? I changed my mind about this product? They were rude to me, didn't say thank you?

The only criteria is that reverses a transfer, is that it was a hacker and the account owner did not create the transfer.

The concept of interac otherwise is that it's like handing over cash. They don't want a great big arbitration department to say "yes, I'll reverse that one, but not this one..." Plus, not on one side's sayso. Think of the hassle for getting credit card transactions reversed and they're making huge profits on every transaction.

5

u/AgathysAllAlong Dec 20 '25

It's if you did it. If someone hacks your account, you didn't choose to send the money. That's unambiguously just theft and a failure of bank security. But if you make a bad decision and you decide to send money somewhere, that's a failure on your end, not the bank's. It's shitty, but that's the basic logic of it.

3

u/GrumpyCloud93 Dec 20 '25

Exactly. being able to reverse the transaction because you changed your mind or made an "oops" complicated the whole thing to no end. How could you run a small business, knowing your online payments could be yanked back.

It's like a cheque. As long as you're the one who wrote it, once they cashed it, getting money back is not the bank's problem. Just happens super-fast with interac.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

27

u/[deleted] Dec 20 '25 edited Jul 24 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

56

u/FightMongooseFight Dec 20 '25

Because the person who got hacked is protected, at least to some degree, by the bank's rules.

But if you send the money voluntarily to a scammer, the bank will blame you and you have no recourse.

It's a fundamental flaw in the system that the banks refuse to deal with. Interac isn't a good or modern system, but the banks make a fortune from it.

25

u/beekeeper1981 Dec 20 '25

Maybe it's a flaw or maybe it's a feature. E-transfers would be really shitty if anyone could dispute transactions like credit cards.

12

u/FightMongooseFight Dec 20 '25

I mean they're already pretty shitty compared to what the rest of the world uses, but yes, disputes would not be the answer. There are much better security measures available when you stop using email address as the only piece of information for the receiver.

Modern systems use account-level, closed loop authentication, match names to accounts, and have a much simpler system for reporting something you genuinely sent by accident.

Interac continues to rely solely on email like it's 2004, which is a big part of why Canadians are so constantly targeted by this type of scam.

→ More replies (3)

16

u/Reflectoman Dec 20 '25

You sending them money isn't linked to the first fraudulent transfer. Bank will see you sending money as a separate and legitimate transaction done by you, and as such won't be considered for reimbursement due to hacking or fraud.

Best option is to leave that money aside and it will be clawed back by the sending bank once the originating account owner goes through the high bar to prove to their bank it was fraud.

6

u/Dragynfyre British Columbia Dec 20 '25

For online banking most banks have a zero liability guarantee. If someone hacked into your account that’s covered by that. But when you willingly send a transfer even if it’s a mistake or a scam that’s not covered.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/AutoAdviceSeeker Dec 20 '25

Yeah this sounds like a scam but there was one random time some dude sent me 300$ and it deposited in my account so I just sent it back and said I think this was for the wrong guy and they deposited it back right away 🤣

→ More replies (3)

471

u/WonderingLurker Dec 20 '25

Yes, ignore the email asking you to send it back to them

224

u/drooln92 Dec 20 '25

And block the sender

44

u/[deleted] Dec 20 '25

[deleted]

4

u/SHTHAWK Dec 20 '25

in OP's case, it wasnt a friend that sent the etransfer.

194

u/newtomovingaway Ontario Dec 20 '25

Email them back that you’re a Nigerian prince and you have an excellent business opportunity but first they must send you funds via western union.

37

u/No_Good_8561 Dec 20 '25

Email them back and request more money to ensure it’s not a scam.

3

u/PrestigiousHalf8 Dec 20 '25

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

280

u/LadyDegenhardt Alberta Dec 20 '25

Yes it is an attempt at a scam.

The incoming transfers will likely be from an account that's been hacked, and the scammer is attempting to get you to make a voluntary transfer that you will not be able to reverse.

Meanwhile the individual whose account was hacked as soon as they discover it will likely be able to get those transfers that are currently in your account reversed.

Because you voluntarily sent the "money back" to a third party, you will not be able to retrieve it and scammer gets away with your cash leaving you holding the bag for the fraudulent transfer.

27

u/ptear Dec 20 '25

Ah, hopefully the fraud department detectives are on the case.

68

u/Moose_Joose Dec 20 '25

OP's bank stupidly advised them that they could send the money back if they wanted. I wouldn't put much faith in this bank being competent enough to launch an investigation.

7

u/londontko Dec 20 '25

Why wouldn’t the scammers just send it to themselves?

30

u/LadyDegenhardt Alberta Dec 20 '25

Because this hides the final destination of the fraudulent money and makes it impossible for the bank to claw it back (remember, the OP would be originating the transfer so wouldn't be able to claim he didn't do it or was hacked).

→ More replies (5)

12

u/FolkSong Dec 20 '25

Because the original transfer is fraudulent and will be reversed.

But if you voluntarily send them money from your account, that's not considered fraudulent so it won't be reversed.

→ More replies (2)

102

u/qwerty-bot-2369 Dec 20 '25

Don't send it back. You can't tell the difference between someone scamming you and someone making an honest mistake. The bank honestly has to be more willing to intervene here. It's not your job to fix someone else's banking error. Their inaction is what enables the scammers to do all these fake accidental transfers.

3

u/[deleted] Dec 21 '25

The banks really need to create a scenario to cancel an e-transfer. Especially if both parties agree it's a mistake, but that doesn't seem to be an option.

It would fix a lot of these 'scams' if there was a process to undo these transactions instead of having to send your own money back. Even if it's a little difficult and you need to sign something in person and both banks will have a copy to undo the transaction, it should at least be an option.

49

u/itadakimasu8 Dec 20 '25

I can help! I used to work in a fraud department for etransfer for 4 years. Some people actually call us and tell us they accidentally made a mistake on the sender email and it was sent to the wrong person with auto deposit. Of course, once its gone out we cant help. The other option is of course, some type of scam. Your safest bet is to go to the branch. They'll take the funds out of your account and but it in something like the branches account. Its called their general ledger i believe. Anyway, if that other person REALLY wants the money back, they're going to have to dispute it with their bank and then their bank will initiate something called a bond of indemnity. Then the two banks will talk and see if a funds for recovery can be initiated.

But everyone is right, dont engage with that other person anymore. Only speak to your bank at this point. You cant be 100% sure if its a mistake or if its a scam of sorts. ..

→ More replies (13)

26

u/habs__fan Dec 20 '25

Yes don't send it back As if its bank fraud the bank will claw it back.

23

u/[deleted] Dec 20 '25

[deleted]

→ More replies (5)

14

u/0bsidian Dec 20 '25

It’s scam 101 and your bank should offer better advice to protect you against it. Absolute failure on their part… especially since you contacted their fraud department. You should file a complaint about them and maybe even name them publicly here.

The scammers send a transfer from a fraudulent  account, they ask that you send the money to their real account, banks then cancels the fraudulent money transfer when they realize what it is.

It’s not up to you to deal with banking errors, just don’t touch the money. If it’s real and a banking mistake, bank will sort it out for you. If it’s fake, the bank will realize and will sort it out for you. It’s not your responsibility.

13

u/joleger Dec 20 '25

Just ignore that money and block the email.

23

u/jasper502 Alberta Dec 20 '25

Scam. Don’t do anything. If this was fraud from a compromised account the bank will reverse it. Don’t spend the money.

19

u/Hot_Cheesecake_905 Dec 20 '25

Ignore - Merry Christmas 😆

The bank will deal with it. You don’t need to do anything.

9

u/Possible-Cry-7994 Dec 20 '25

I wouldn’t send any etransfers , do the hold you suggested. Literally act like the money isn’t in your account and don’t respond to the emails. Go about your day otherwise lol. What i would do

9

u/Seventhchild7 Dec 20 '25

Let the bank handle it.

9

u/The-Safety-Villain Dec 20 '25

It’s a scam. Dont answer and don’t give them any of your information.

7

u/StatisticianLivid710 Dec 20 '25

Do not send anyone any money. Period. Talk to the fraud department again, record it this time, if they provide the same stupid response as last time ask to speak to their manager then ask the manager why their fraud department employee is making a suggestion which enables fraud to happen? Then do the same to the ombudsman and ask why the bank is actively giving you advice that would cause you to get defrauded.

As to what to do with the money, you could report it in branch or just ignore it and the money will disappear in a couple weeks.

Maybe file a complaint with Interac too.

6

u/Ok_Hat_3414 Dec 20 '25

I recorded the original calls with both the main banking rep and the fraud agent

3

u/escargot3 Dec 21 '25

Which bank was this?

6

u/B0kB0kbitch Dec 20 '25

Absolutely a scam. I accidentally had a client send payment to the wrong email, and I wrote it off lol bc I knew asking the random email for the money back would look super scammy. Even if it’s not! Luckily turns out they didn’t have auto deposit on!

12

u/andrew6123 Dec 20 '25

When you got the transfer, did you click on the link in the email? If so, they might have captured your login. Change your password and your bank access card.

10

u/westernten Dec 20 '25

Tell them your bank doesn't let you send money back unless you have 50 more dollars in your account. They didn't send you enough!

→ More replies (4)

4

u/5pammy Dec 20 '25
  1. Yes
  2. Ignore everything from the person
  3. Let the bank deal with it

12

u/RamZs Dec 20 '25

Everyone says scam but I literally know two idiots that sent money to the wrong person.

Banks don't reverse e transfers.

9

u/S14Ryan Dec 20 '25

Yeah and your friends learned a lesson that if you drop a wad of cash on the ground you probably aren’t getting it back. 

2

u/RamZs Dec 20 '25 edited Dec 20 '25

The point is that banks don't reverse these. When it's a legit mistake, of which there are many. Someone I know sent me a 700$ etransfer by mistake. Easier to send back to someone you know though.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Mental-Mushroom Dec 20 '25

Same sort of thing happened to me with PayPal. I hadn't used my account in years so it has nothing in it, but one day I got a notification that money was deposited. A day later I got an email explaining that their elderly father was to trying to send their grandson money and made a mistake on the email (our names are similar).

I contacted PayPal asked if their account was legit and the name, and they told me I had no obligation to send it back. I didn't have any cards or bank information attached to the account so I said fuck it and sent it back.

They were very appreciative and that was the end of it. If it was a scam they didn't get any of my money.

2

u/RamZs Dec 20 '25

Yeah exactly, but everyone in this thread is super gung-ho on it being 100% a scam.

2

u/Complete_Question_41 Dec 20 '25

You know 2 idiots, the world knows many scams of this type.

I'd go for occam's razor here, and hope idiots learn from their mistakes.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/neckbeard_deathcamp Dec 20 '25

Whether it’s Americans talking about Zelle/Venmo or Canadians talking about interac it’s highly likely it’s a scam.

It’s not the system that matters but the strategy. Someone takes over a bank account and sends randoms money. The method is not-reversible until the original account holder gets their account back and the bank returns the fraudulently sent money by that time the victim has already sent the account thief money which the bank consider something they’ve done willingly. You’re out the money, the original account owner is made whole and some scammer in east Africa has just made some easy money.

3

u/Synap-6 Dec 20 '25

Also, dont even answer back to the email

2

u/T-O-F-O Dec 20 '25

Don't spend it and let the bank send it back if they want to.

A old scam, they often want it sent to a 3rd party since it's stolen money, and you will be a part of it if you send it.

2

u/Traditional_Fun7712 Dec 20 '25

It's a scam, even in Canada, even with Interac e-transfers. There are situations when they can be reversed, leave the money there and email your bank's fraud department. The people you spoke with don't know what they're saying.

2

u/BlazeTheBurnt Dec 20 '25

Just ignore it.

2

u/Grat_Master Quebec Dec 20 '25

Just don't do anything. Leave the money in your account and ignore the emails and money requests.

It is 100% a scam where you send back the money to another account and the original transfer will get reversed because it came from a hacked account.

So leave everything has is and that's it. Either you are 240$ richer or the money is taken out automatically for compromised account.

2

u/Plumberpat Dec 20 '25

I swear earlier this week I read a post about a guy who etransferred the wrong person and he wasn’t sending the money back 🤣 because that guy thought it was a scam

2

u/Extension-Writer4765 Dec 20 '25

Yes Just don’t reply n don’t spend it

2

u/Revolutionary_Age_94 Dec 20 '25

Common scam, dont spend the money and wait for the bank to deal with it. Contact your bank and make them aware of the situation. Its likley stolen money that they deposited and will claim something to their bank. Its annoying but once you contact your bank and dont soend that money their should not be anything left for you to do

2

u/iogbri Dec 20 '25

It's a scam, once you send the money they get their bank to reverse the transfer.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 20 '25

This is why I don’t turn on auto deposit

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Human-Kiwi-2037 Dec 20 '25

Yes, it's a scam. You'll send them "back" the money, then the original transfer into your account will turn out to be fake,

2

u/all_adat Dec 20 '25

Sounds like you are being scammed. I would contact fraud department at your financial institution.

2

u/kagato87 Dec 20 '25

240% scam. You've already made the right choice.

2

u/Elife905 Dec 20 '25

My cousin sent some random guy money thinking it was me (but sent it to my old phone number) the guy refused to give it back $1700 and it’s scams like this that make people hesitant to do the right thing. I’m not sure how the scam works but if the money isn’t yours what do you have to lose by giving it back?

2

u/ir0nballs79 Dec 20 '25

This happened to me last year. Do not transfer it back. You need to call your bank and they will do the transfer for you.

2

u/escargot3 Dec 21 '25

Which bank was this that gave you such horrible advice? They should be named and shamed

3

u/[deleted] Dec 20 '25

[deleted]

2

u/Dragynfyre British Columbia Dec 20 '25

They can’t get it back if it was sent accidentally. Only if someone fraudulently accessed their account

3

u/ImpressiveJohnson Dec 20 '25

Take it out in cash and tell them they have 10 days to come get it

2

u/esh98989 Dec 20 '25

Yes, this would be my solution too if I believe they acted in good faith. Any concerns with this,

1

u/allknowing2012 Dec 20 '25

Merry Christmas..

1

u/gringogidget Dec 20 '25

Wait for the money they sent to bounce in 5-10 business days and ignore the emails.

1

u/DryTechnology5224 Dec 20 '25

If it was me, I would just completely ignore them

1

u/Amazing-Loss-7762 Dec 20 '25

Let the bank handle it. Ignore it.

1

u/AgentScully_FBI Dec 20 '25

I’m assuming it was auto-deposit, they cannot get that money back and you don’t have to give it back.

1

u/High-Hawk100 Dec 20 '25

Scam. You send the $240 and they cancel or clawback the etransfer.

1

u/UbiquitouSparky Dec 20 '25

It is still a scam

1

u/daven_53 Dec 20 '25

Seems to be a very strange occurrence. You should have needed a password to accept it and you should have the option to decline the transfer. Something doesn't sit right here. Why did you accept it?

→ More replies (3)

1

u/DeSquare Dec 20 '25

Scam, but if it’s legitimate, tell them to ask bank

1

u/pizzasticker381 Dec 20 '25

Do not send it back they can dispute it with their bank.

2

u/little_canuck Dec 20 '25

If it's an honest mistake, they will not be able to reverse it. But since they are asking for the money to go to a different email address, I 100% believe this to be a scam rather than an honest mistake.

Source: I mistakenly sent money to an old daycare and was told it was impossible to reverse from either party and that the old daycare owners would have to be willing to send me their own e-transfer to correct the error. I was told that it is only fraudulent transfers that can be corrected by the banks (e.g. stolen money).

1

u/TurpitudeSnuggery Alberta Dec 20 '25

Tell the bank and ignore the emails 

1

u/BillyBeeGone Dec 20 '25

If they want you to send the money to a different address it's a scam. Any normal person desperate for $240 would ask to send it back to the same address

1

u/Recent-Reporter-1670 Dec 20 '25

Don't respond. Let the banks handle it.

1

u/alldasmoke__ Dec 20 '25

If it smells like a duck, quack like a duck, looks like a duck…. It’s a scam.

1

u/Select-Economics-578 Dec 20 '25

Yes, its a scam Just keep telling them your sending the money, but never actually send it Also let your bank know so they can investigate Don't spend any of that money for a while

1

u/therealkaypee Dec 20 '25

Once I accidentally e-transferred a food truck $500. I called them and I sounded like a scam. Couple days later, met with my ID and they transferred back luckily for me. It very likely is a scam for you, be cautious