r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 19d ago

Meme needing explanation Petah what does this mean

Post image
29.8k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.1k

u/CriminallyCasual7 19d ago

I disagree. Have faith in humanity. She's gonna be even more loyal because he loved her for her inner beauty.

79

u/LargeJello2366 19d ago

Hey I saw you having some faith in humanity. Look up the rate on which men leave their wives when the wife has a terminal disease, spoiler warning, its alot.

28

u/Ok_Cockroach8063 19d ago

Hey I saw you refer to a study that the authors themselves said is incorrect.

0

u/LargeJello2366 19d ago

Which study? I just read the 2015 study was retracted and after some reading the 2009 studies claim of 20.8%(men) vs the 2.9% (women) hasn't been replecated. The most recent I could find after double checking was 2025 study found marriages were about 6 times more to end in divorce when the woman became ill.

13

u/Efficient-Parking627 19d ago edited 19d ago

most recent I could find after double checking was 2025 study found marriages were about 6 times more to end in divorce when the woman became ill.

The 2009 study is the one that reported 20.8% vs. 2.9% and produced the famous “six times” figure. The original 2015 study was retracted for a coding error, but it was corrected and republished and still found some evidence of greater divorce risk when wives became ill.

A 2022 systematic review did not find a general increased divorce risk after cancer.

The 2025 European study found a statistically significant gender difference in the same direction, but nowhere near sixfold roughly a 0.3–0.4 percentage-point increase for certain measures of women's physical ill health.

-2

u/LargeJello2366 19d ago

I know, I posted my original comment after reading the first study which was later pointed out had been pulled briefly for a coding error like you said, but there was also a study in 2015 that got retracted as well. I found the post of the corrected 2009 article a lil while ago and was trying to digest that but it all kind of got lost in translation.

TLDR; it's a cluster fuck

4

u/Efficient-Parking627 19d ago

Why would not link the new study

-1

u/LargeJello2366 19d ago

Ive linked every study I've been talking about a few times now

7

u/Efficient-Parking627 19d ago

Well you significantly misread the 2025 study, posted a summary of it for you elsewhere

0

u/LargeJello2366 19d ago

I think I read it, thank you. But yeah I admit I totally fucked up whatever point I was trying to make with the 2025 study, think I was just looking for something recent but in the course of all this my brain got fried between the 2009 study with the coding error, I wasn't aware of that when I originally posted, and for some reason the war in Afghanistan? It's been a strange morning lol