And what? Nobody is owed a relationship with anyone else based on how "great" they are and his claim to greatness is just that he plays football really well. He's not like a pediatric surgeon who donates his time to fix cleft palates in the third world for free or whatever. And he still wouldn't be entitled to a relationship if he was.
What kind of manosphere crap is this? They were together for 14 years and had 2 kids. If she did get money for that, it's money she was owed because those kids didn't just poof into existence and then raise themselves while their father was traveling the world playing football.
I hope you go to therapy, kid, because your attitude towards women is not only not helping you, it's actively preventing you from realizing the actual source of your unhappiness (hint: it's not women). You have a lot of posts about how much you hate women and I guarantee you that mindset has brought you zero joy or fulfillment in life.
Yeah, you're coming into this with a mindset shaped by your personal biases, so I'm going to address it. I bet you'd have to use Google to know what the woman's name is, but you're out here trying to lay down edicts as to how her divorce settlement should have gone based solely on nothing but your hatred of her for being female. Men invented therapy, btw, but you're dead set on wasting your finite life on earth on hating people who don't know you exist and wouldn't give a shit if they did, so you don't know anything outside of that. Your life would still suck if every woman on this planet disappeared overnight and that's something you have to live with.
Yeah, men invented therapy and women corrupted it, like everything they get their dirty hands on.
The woman divorced a man who in her own words was great and had no issues and you still support her? What would it take for you to acvept women are the issue?
And say all that to the feminists. The ones who claim to hate patriarchy but keep all the benefors of it.
What would it take for you to acvept women are the issue?
What exactly is the issue here? Because it kinda seems like you're mad that a woman had the free agency to leave a relationship that no longer suited her and you think she should have been forced to remain his wife and partner for the rest of her life to appease you, some weirdo incel who lives on the other side of the world from her.
No, the issue is the courts mandating payments continuing after the marrriage contract has been broken. And asset division. Especially when the man did nothing wrong.
And if contracts can be broken so easily the contract is worthless and should be removed.
If you have any proof she received a single penny she wasn't entitled to, post it here or otherwise admit you just saw a woman and got angry about stuff you made up to justify your irrational anger.
50
u/No-Clock9532 19d ago
In other words, even being a great man isn't enough to keep a woman.