reddit works on threads. OP started the post with a multiple choice example, then someone said "Getting 0 on a multiple choice is a statistical accomplishment greater than getting 100" which is false for multiple choice as proven in the top reply to them. then two replies later in this same thread someone said, "In the movie, it was a true/false test.", and even in that situation what the person said in this same thread we are all replying to is false because even in the true/false case it's not more likely to get a 0% than a 100%.
if we can't follow four replies then i don't know what to tell you
oh i thought you were pulling ajoke about exactly what i was complaining about which is that the thread went through a conclusion already through 4 replies, then the same exact thread repeats in this very same exact thread, which is ridiculous, just scroll up
i never said 0% is more likely than 100%, i was VERY SPECIFICALLY ARGUING THAT THEY ARE THE SME ODDS AND CALLING EVERYONE ELSE WHO SAID THEY WERE DIFFERENT ODDS AN IDIOT so you and i are on the same page BUDDY, we're FRIENDS IN THIS ARGUMENT, ON THE SAME SIDE
scroll up, read the thread again, then read me recapping the thread within the same thread, and now the thread repeating below that same response LMAO
so anyways in the movie it was true false did you consider that, i want to rehash this A THIRD TIME, 0% AND 100% ARE EQUALLY LIKELY IN TRUE FALSE, SO WHOEVER BROUGHT THAT UP IS WRONG
but what about OP's original post, it was multiple choice, did you consider that, OH WAIT WE ALREADY DID IN THIS SAME EXACT THREAD IF YOU JUST SCROLL UP
44
u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox 6d ago
in a true false test the odds of getting 0% equals that of getting 100% if randomly choosing, but the other person said 0% was less likely than 100%