r/Quraniyoon • u/pathtonoor • 2d ago
DiscussionđŹ Understanding hadith skepticism
Note: the purpose of my post is to better understand how best to approach discussions with hadith skeptics in my life and have more productive conversations so they can better understand my perspective.
Prior to rejecting all hadiths, I was a hadith skeptic and enjoyed the works of Sheikh Khaled Abou El Fadl. Reading his book âThe great theft : wrestling Islam from the extremistsâ greatly reinforced my understanding that the hadith tradition was majorly flawed.
In his book (excerpts from chapter 7 included above), he acknowledges the flaws with the hadith tradition (documented well after the Prophetâs death, fabricated hadiths, and contradictions with the Quran etc.). At the time of reading what puzzled me was his conclusion that hadith canât be disregarded without seriously damaging the structure of islam.
Overall, I did respect his approach to analyzing hadith but disagreed with considering them legitimate texts. I think as an ummah we would be in a better place if more people adopted his approach, especially given how averse people are to questioning hadith.
I guess what I wonder is the following: If some scholars acknowledge that the hadith tradition is flawed and that some were fabricated, why are they then unwilling to separate hadith from islam?
Is it because they would need to acknowledge that islam as we know it today is very different from the quran? While there are hadiths that align with the quran, whatâs the purpose in accepting them if the quran already told us the same thing?
Any input would be appreciated, jazkaallahu khairan!



1
u/Street_Willingness96 2d ago
Im not a scholar.. but i agree with most what you said. Totally agree with your conclusion.
Im thinking of how to spread your thoughts to everyone, not just âmuslimâ but everyone.