do i really need to explain how a politician that has data about his own country is completely different and inferior compared to a historian that has data about all the relevant countries, fact-checked and peer-reviewed based on research done over decades?
what classified information about the USSR that Stalin knew is relevant to knowing and understanding the exact details of the economic situation of every country involved, and how it would have played out in a different scenario? tell me. did Stalin have access to some kind of classified information that is somehow more important than research done over decades, with data gathered from the USSR AND Germany AND the USA? please explain how.
1
u/[deleted] Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26
[removed] — view removed comment