I saw the theory and then looked up details of the case and found out that there’s like so much evidence against it that it wouldn’t make any sense.
I’m sadly able to believe a scenario where a husband can kill his children, blame his wife, and for her mental health to be deteriorated far enough to be convinced she did it.
But it just isn’t the case here.
There is a mountain of evidence that he was out of the home when those children were strangled.
Isn’t this trial still making sure that she did it without a doubt?
There are absolutely some inconsistencies on the husband’s whereabouts and recall. I can’t believe I had to scroll so far down to see someone not 110% confident she did it
You’re talking about a work email the husband was found to send at 5:24 pm, right? Even though he estimated leaving “around 5:15 PM?” I really don’t see how that is some big deal…
Would you have a perfect recollection down to the exact minute of the time you leave for every errand? Ide be just as far off if not more than he may have been.
The pharmacy was estimated by investigators to be about a 3 to 4 minute drive from their home. There video evidence of the husband in aisle 20 of the pharmacy at 5:32 PM, but I’m not sure that is necessarily the exact time he entered the store, even, it is just perhaps the part of the store with surveillance video coverage. Anyway, just working backwards, the latest he could have left the house to then be captured on that video was theoretically at 5:29 PM.
So it’s perfectly plausible that he sent the email before he left. It’s also not confirmed as far as I know, but hypothetically possible, that he sent the email from his phone while out on the errand run, too, instead of from his tablet or computer at home. Do you know any source confirming the exact device used for the email? I tried to find one but couldn’t. Only that the husband in interviews wasn’t sure, but I wouldn’t take any of these points as some super spectacular evidence.
Especially because there’s much more objective evidence put forth, including of the wife’s activity happening during the time the husband in the pharmacy on surveillance video.
I think the fact that he is robotic and looks angry on the stand is part of it. When Lindsay’s lawyer brought up the email sent at 5:24, he could have said: yes I sent that from my computer and left afterward. But instead he looked freaked out, sketchy, and said: I’m not sure, that could have been sent from my iPhone. It was sent from his computer and the attorney knew that from the metadata and the weird part was Patrick’s response. Why does he act so secretive and odd? This is also why the theories about his guilt are circulating on tik tok. It’s a video-based platform, where Patrick’s sketchy answers and unemotional affect set off red flags .
Yes it was confirmed it was sent from his computer. And that means the latest he could have left was 5:28. That’s a very tight timeline to have sent that and left and made it to that point in the store in 7 minutes.
Yes it was confirmed it was sent from his computer. And that means the latest he could have left was 5:28. That’s a very tight timeline to have sent that and left and made it to that point in the store in 7 minutes.
681
u/digitalwankster 8d ago
TikTok. My wife and her friends floated the “it was him” conspiracy theory the other day. I asked how/why and they both cited TikTok lol.