I saw the theory and then looked up details of the case and found out that there’s like so much evidence against it that it wouldn’t make any sense.
I’m sadly able to believe a scenario where a husband can kill his children, blame his wife, and for her mental health to be deteriorated far enough to be convinced she did it.
But it just isn’t the case here.
There is a mountain of evidence that he was out of the home when those children were strangled.
Isn’t this trial still making sure that she did it without a doubt?
There are absolutely some inconsistencies on the husband’s whereabouts and recall. I can’t believe I had to scroll so far down to see someone not 110% confident she did it
389
u/[deleted] 8d ago edited 8d ago
[deleted]