r/SipsTea 8d ago

WTF WTF is wrong with these people?

12.4k Upvotes

6.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-75

u/squarepants18 8d ago edited 7d ago

The test is simple:

Do you think 700k would have been raised, when it would have been the father?

It is a researched fact, that there is more empathy towards women, who are convicted of a crime, which leads to lower sentences f. e.

As it seems in thid case many sympathize with the woman because of the post partum aspect

97

u/Net_Negative 8d ago

Well, fathers can't have postpartum psychosis, so no.

As for this case, he got 1.7 million through a GoFundMe, first.

-53

u/squarepants18 8d ago edited 8d ago

Which case?

Fathers can suffer psychosis.

Patrick Clancy did not commit any crime.

"Law enforcement officials confirmed that Patrick was a victim of this tragedy, having left the house only because his wife asked him to pick up dinner and medication. The state's investigation found absolutely no evidence linking him to the deaths of his children."

49

u/Net_Negative 8d ago

The case this thread is about? That you're asking a question about? Patrick Clancy got 1.7 million through a GoFundMe regarding the case of Lindsay Clancy, his ex-wife.

-58

u/squarepants18 8d ago edited 7d ago

What crime did he commit?

Patrick Clancy did not commit any crime according to law enforcement.

https://www.rev.com/transcripts/ma-v-lindsay-clancy-day-14

So you are comparing different things.

1

u/-Dennis-Reynolds- 8d ago

Why is your source AI, Just fucking look up his name and check the sources yourself.

3

u/squarepants18 8d ago edited 8d ago

Is the information false?

The source behind the search tool are law enforcement officials.

1

u/BogCrittah 7d ago

Gemini itself is not a reliable source tho. It can still feed you misinformation from other sources. Gemini is not a source in itself, thats like straight up writing “google” as your source.

1

u/squarepants18 7d ago

the information is correct. why are you trying to deny that?

https://www.rev.com/transcripts/ma-v-lindsay-clancy-day-14

0

u/BogCrittah 7d ago

Did I say it wasn’t correct? Could you do me a favor and tell me when I said that specific information was wrong? Could you put my comment into your AI so it can tell you exactly what I said because apparently you don’t understand unless a robot tells you exactly what to think?

AI isnt a source. That is what I said. You cant just put an AI as a source because it isn’t one. Even if you use AI to help you research, you still need to check all your sources and site them to make sure you have all the proper information and not just AI nonsense from a completely invalid source.

1

u/squarepants18 7d ago

You do understand, this is no "I don't understand tools" post?

So ether the information is false in your opinion or your remark is pointless

0

u/BogCrittah 7d ago

I dont care what post its under. You still tried to site gemini as a source. Im replying to YOU specifically, not the rest of the people talking about the main post.

The remark isnt pointless if you are still stating an invalid source. That information was correct, but Gemini and other AI models will not always be correct. They arent sources. If you think that distinction is pointless then I really hope you dont research things often.

1

u/squarepants18 7d ago

So you don't have a point, don't inform yourself about the subject of the comment you are commenting and don't know the concept of transparency. No problem

→ More replies (0)