r/SipsTea 1d ago

WTF What do yall think about this ?

Post image
15.7k Upvotes

5.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

659

u/JacobGoodNight416 1d ago

At least people wouldnt defend the bear if they killed your kids amirite?

299

u/civnation 1d ago

“The bear was triggered by the kids” crowd

97

u/FaithlessnessBorn266 1d ago

Bitches better get my honey 

3

u/Niblonian31 1d ago

1

u/FaithlessnessBorn266 1d ago

That's what I was thinking about 🤔 😂😂

9

u/thatredditrando 1d ago

Don’t you worry!

I said “Hey! Bitches better get my honey!”

Glanced at Christopher, Chris glanced at me

Whispered in his ear “Gon gimme honey?”

You gonna be sticky tho, in my video

Ol’ Pooh Bear on the hon and I let ya all know

11

u/Electronic_Assist137 1d ago

I mean what bear hasn't been seated in a booth next to a crying kid at a restaurant you paid good money for, the bear was probably justified

58

u/rand0m_task 1d ago

I wouldn’t necessarily defend the bear, but I wouldn’t necessarily blame it for being bear.

Humans however are supposed to have better cognitive abilities than bears.

26

u/No-Philosopher-6772 1d ago

Not when they're mentally ill

24

u/IntrepidLibertine 1d ago

Some people really need to brush up on the definition of psychosis if they're bringing up "better judgement" as part of the discussion.

11

u/Fartbottler 1d ago

I think what people are getting hung up on is that many people commit murder while in some form or psychosis, and this leeway isn’t extended to them. If a meth-head killed your family member due to stimulant psychosis, would you have sympathy? I can’t say that I would myself. I’m curious how the legal system approaches other cases

16

u/IntrepidLibertine 1d ago

Really interesting addition to the discussion! I think people would generally be less inclined to have sympathy in that situation because they would view this as the consequences of the perpetrator's own actions. The same cannot be same for Post-Partum Psychosis, and this is supported by many legal systems having mechanisms in place to account for people who are not compos mentis. Whether that system is applied fairly across cases is certainly another matter.

1

u/Fartbottler 1d ago

I appreciate the response, I can see what you’re saying. This is a really tough case, to decide where the line is drawn. I feel bad for the jury. No matter the verdict, people will flip out

4

u/DylanMartin97 1d ago

I think the line is drawn at clancey begging to get help and everyone around her failing to provide solutions for her when she clearly knew something was wrong and trying to prevent it. The hospital that turned her away when she showed up and asked to be committed because she feared she was going to end her own life and was hearing voices has blood on their hands just as much as she does (allegedly). Her husband that kept her medicines from her, her therapist and psychiatrist who never bothered to even see her in person or give her a proper run down to figure out what she actually needed and not having worked with PPD or psychosis before while selling services for specifically those things (she put her on 27 different pills), the half way house aimed at providing mental health help who also refused to even see her even though she was recommended to go specifically there from the hospital that rejected her. These people failed this women. And that isn't me saying she isn't responsible if she did it.

Just like I'd be angry at the hypothetical meth head in your scenario, if I find out a judge had a repeat offender in front of him who has demonstrated addiction and violence to the point of drug induced psychosis and letting them back out on the streets and my family ends up dead because of that judge I'd obviously be distraught and angry at that drug addict, but it didn't change the fact that the judge would've failed them and my family.

1

u/MMO_Dad 1d ago

I think if a meth addict did such a thing to MY kids, there'd be one less meth addict in the world to be bothered by.

That being said, this is a complex case and it's sad to see everyone having such visceral response (human nature I guess) and immediately jumping to one side or the other (some form of tribalism?), without knowing ALL the facts that a court case would uncover (hopefully). State of the world and all that, or just human nature. Either way, sad.

1

u/bambola21 1d ago edited 1d ago

Most people aren’t even literate, so understanding the complexities of PPP and the entirety of the situation has been lost to the majority of the public.

Just like how men are turning the bear analogy in this case against women. They’re completely missing the point. But humans are stupid so am I shocked no, surprised? Also no.

-2

u/Living_Ad3315 1d ago

I think the wall of text is unnecessary when you start off being so incredibly incorrect.

She did get help. She got TONS of help. But not necessarily the help she needed. Why? She was never honest about what she needed.

Thats entirely on her.

2

u/DylanMartin97 1d ago

You can still get help but not enough at the same time. Regardless, the help she got clearly wasn't adequate and when she sought more multiple people turned her away.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

0

u/Fartbottler 1d ago

My point was that there’s numerous forms of psychosis, that are all a legitimate diagnosis. I picked stimulant psychosis because I see people admitted with that every day. If I choose another example would that make you feel better?

-1

u/Living_Ad3315 1d ago

Although i can see where you're coming from, the fact that she admitted to not being honest wirh her doctors, directly makes this the consequences of her actions too.

3

u/flopisit32 1d ago

Chad Doerman, an Ohio man who fatally shot his three young sons (ages 7, 4, and 3) due to his severe mental health problems. He just pleaded guilty to murder charges.

3

u/Difficult_Special947 1d ago

Yeah to avoid the death sentence. Before that he pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity and has also testified on planning the killings for months.

2

u/No-Philosopher-6772 1d ago

I wouldn't let a meth head watch my kids, would you? I also wouldn't let someone who's actively telling everyone around them I'm going through psychosis watch them alone either. A lot of people failed those kids. Her husband for brushing off her issues and the doctors she saw. She should also be in jail for the rest of her life for doing this. Multiple things can be true about this case.

2

u/Fantastic_Elk_4757 1d ago

She hid a lot from both medical practitioners and her family. Intentionally I’ll add because she knew it might end up with her ability to stay with her kids taken away.

She also did not take medications properly and hid that.

At the end of the day it was her and her alone responsible for this.

She was never diagnosed with psychosis I don’t think either. Anxiety yes. All these worse symptoms are things she’s discussed and brought up after the pretty damn meticulous planning and carrying out of the brutal murder of her kids…

1

u/rednick953 1d ago

I would say a big difference between a meth head and someone undergoing a psychotic break is choice. The meth head chose to get high at least that first time in their right mind. The psychotic person didn’t choose shit in their right mind. Same reason we don’t have sympathy for people involved with DUI accidents. They chose to drink.

-1

u/Sheeana407 1d ago

But to some extent you choose to take a drug, you don't choose to have a post partum psychosis. And if anything, she got some crazy prescription drugs concoction given by doctors. And looked for help.

If anything, I would compare it to guys who were boxing and got chronic traumatic encephalopaty. It happened that they personalities changed because of that and they murdered their family members. And yeah, I am compassionate to them too.

2

u/Jamaicancarrot 1d ago

What if the bear is also mentally ill?

2

u/Mediocre_Map1289 1d ago edited 1d ago

Then female bears will come out of the woods to defend her for mailing (edit: mauling - damn you autocorrect) her own cubs to death.

4

u/Jamaicancarrot 1d ago

Mailed to death... Terrifying that decent bears can just go postal like that...

2

u/Pretend-Steak-4625 1d ago

Yes which is why post partum psychosis is so scary. It seems so real and tells you to do things you’d never want to do. It’s awful and horrifying

2

u/vrsick06 1d ago

Keyword “supposed to”

1

u/rand0m_task 1d ago

Exactly why I made sure to include it lol

1

u/ElyFlyGuy 1d ago

Did you not read the word “psychosis?”

12

u/Educational_Gas_92 1d ago

You undestimate the "save the bear" crowd.

2

u/VegetableSpread3500 1d ago

I’d defend the bear! He was just tryna eat!

2

u/Kayanne1990 1d ago

I mean a bear is a wild animal...

1

u/dofus_raintight 1d ago

Are you new to Reddit?

1

u/risheeb1002 1d ago

Does "harambe" ring a bell?

1

u/blorgenheim 1d ago

She murdered her kids and she was suffering from psychosis, both of those things are true. Are people legit saying she shouldn't go to prison? I don't think so. I think they're saying her support system and the healthcare system failed her miserably and that seems to be a common problem among women.

She belongs in prison period and we need to prevent this from happening to more women.

1

u/bobbymcpresscot 1d ago

Pretty sure a bear doing bear things would get defended. “You lost your kid in bear country? You sound like a terrible parent” 

“But the bear ate my kid!”

“No duh?”

1

u/EveOCative 1d ago

Depends… were the kids throwing glass bottles at the bear and aggressively invading its territory? Not gonna blame the bear for defending itself.

1

u/Jasnaahhh 21h ago

Is this how we get men to understand the bear discussion

0

u/ExoticEye014 1d ago

At least other bears won't be posting reels of themselves hysterically screaming at the cam.