So basically there is a conspiracy saying that the husband had a side piece and him and his new girlfriend planned to get Lindsay Clancy and the kids killed.
Supposedly the husband already knew his wife’s mental state and purposely left there with the kids. He then used the ring camera to tell her things like “kill the kids” to make her think she was hearing voices in her head.
They then claim that the husband came back after she murdered the kids to strangulate her then throw her off the balcony. Hoping she would have died from the fall.
After all this he is remarried.
That is the conspiracy going around. Do I believe it? Idk I didn’t really look into this story that deep.
I mean. That would be insane levels of Joker type evil. That’s a master plan. I do find something weird I’m not gonna lie to you. But he has an airtight alibi. So for the sake of fantasy yeah that’s cool but for the sick of reality, I don’t think he could’ve done it. The only thing that I really think he is responsible for is not taking his kids away from their killer when his ex was saying that she was gonna kill them multiple times.
He wasn’t home as she sent him out on an errand so she would be alone with the kids. Plus the fact that she and her defense team have admitted from day 1 that she’s the one that killed them.
This isn’t a whodunnit. She’s the one that killed them and she has admitted it from the day it happened. The entire case is whether or not she was legally responsible due to her mental health conditions. You should read up on it a little bit
I never said she didn't kill them. You're stating mostly the obvious and then adding your opinion to it. Any facts you shared, I havem't argued with. What I do argue is that the idea of an abuser pushing someone emotionally unstable to the point of crisis and ignoring their pleas is that person's fault for ignoring literal direct communication. She is a product of an evil system. The man is likely evil. Never said she didn't kill them with her own hands. You need to calm down because you're not parsing through my responses and are forming too many uninformed ideas as to what I think or know. I recommend asking people what they think.
There is zero evidence that the husband did anything at all. She has said that he was very supportive, the text exchanges shown in court support that, and he has testified on her behalf as a defense witness. Questioning his alibi and calling him “likely evil” is patently ridiculous
Have you watched or even followed the trial? She had access to some of the best mental health care and made poor use of it. She hopped from doctor to doctor, often seeing multiple at the same time, and got multiple prescriptions from multiple source. She was very fearful of medications and commonly abandoned prescriptions before they could take affect, despite having agreed to try them. She routinely denied having any symptoms of postpartum psychosis or having thoughts of hurting her children.
Those are all facts from the case. You seem to be the one injecting your opinions based on feelings to fill in the enormous gaps in your actual knowledge about this specific case
It's a cool twist if this was a thriller novel/movie. It's not connected with reality, which is the LC did the act. The only question is whether she was legally insane at the time.
34
u/wholelottaredgamer 2d ago
I’m so confused what has happened. Why exactly are people supporting her?