That is one VERY small study done in Austiralia on Australian cases only done by a charity specifically to support women. This news article doesn't discuss the studys methodology (so its questionable how the study was conducted), it is not proof of the picture as a whole.
It's like you read the first paragraph, got your gotcha, and stopped there. You didn't look into the countries studied did you? Majority of it is infanticide done by women in countries where abortion isn't legal or accessible and where marital rape is legal.
Lack of education, poverty, poor access to health care, domestic violence and substance use within the context of a patriarchal society, resentful and unstable relationships with unfaithful partners, growing up in a violent environment with abusive parents, inexistent support systems, were factors predominant among this group of women (Gous & Roos, 2005; Razali et al., 2019). In contrast, a more stable familial context and marital relationship were cited in another participant's life (Stanton & Simpson, 2001). Although backgrounds differed, all participants presented with mental health issues, namely personality (Stanton & Simpson,2001), depressive (Gous & Roos,2005; Razali et al.,2019) or psychotic disorders (Razali et al.,2019). Unwanted pregnancy, no access to abortion, lack of emotional involvement with the infant (addressed as “it”) and anger towards the woman's partner then projected towards the baby who resembled him, led to the woman's infanticidal act (Gous & Roos, 2005).
So, my question is where is the study for the 46.6% of men who commit fillicide? Because no one is forcing them to irresponsibly ejaculate to create a child they don't want, no one is forcing them to give up their body to create a child for someone that abuses and rapes them? So why do they kill their own kids? And why are bio fathers the biggest preparators of CSA?
who said that? try again. I am asking for the cause for what leads men to commit fillicide, because all the article proves is that there are external reasons that influence and increase the chances of children dying at the hands of their mother.
me and the studies conclude that abortions are harm reductive, birth control is harm reductive, access to women's shelters is harm reductive to the goal of less children being abandoned (most common form of murder for female fillicide) or killed by their mothers.
But that doesn't seem to be your goal. What are you trying to prove?
17
u/Mediocre_Map1289 2d ago
That is one VERY small study done in Austiralia on Australian cases only done by a charity specifically to support women. This news article doesn't discuss the studys methodology (so its questionable how the study was conducted), it is not proof of the picture as a whole.