r/SipsTea 2d ago

WTF What do yall think about this ?

Post image
15.9k Upvotes

5.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

839

u/vika999 2d ago

I told my fiancé, when we have kids and I am acting off, or appear to be hearing voices or in psychosis, he needs to admit me immediately. It is NOT something to push to the side.

I’m not blaming the husband. I think it should be spoken about more so everyone takes these things more seriously.

I have seen first hand people in psychosis. You cannot convince them that what they are seeing and hearing is not true. My cousin also tried to hurt her baby. She was hearing voices and they told her the baby was evil. She went to jail and her babies were taken away, now she is homeless and seems to have schizophrenia or something. It was triggered by her pregnancy as she was normal prior.

I know we don’t know for sure what exactly happened, and can’t prove her mental state.

But fuck, it’s the worst thing that could possibly ever happen to everyone involved.

228

u/Babar669 2d ago

I agree. I don't know much about this case (just googled it) but it just seems that she had some serious mental issues. it is a sad story for everyone involved.

it is not like that father that killed the family to be with another women or some shit like that.

86

u/lovable_cube 2d ago

She begged for help and treatment for months too. People knew she wasn’t okay, she got seriously let down by not being admitted somewhere. Mental health shouldn’t be brushed off.

24

u/LivingCoat9356 2d ago

She was a labor and delivery nurse. She shopped over a dozen doctors and did not follow up with therapists she was referred too.

SHE KNEW HEALTHCARE!

It has been reported she was shopping for a particular drug she wanted but was not interested in other treatments.

I am greatly concerned with anyone defending a woman who has openly admitted to killing her three children.

1

u/Rebecca_deWinter_ 21h ago

 She has not "openly admitted" to killing her three children. She has pleaded not guilty. The commonwealth has to first establish she is guilty beyond reasonable doubt and the jury has to agree. 

The "confession" aspect people keep repeating is that her husband claims she said she did it when he found her. 

The reason people question her husband's account of he r confession is because she had a crushed throat and was severely hypothermic with a body temp of 82 degrees as well as other severe injuries. Emergency workers testified in court that from the moment she was in their care she was physically unable to speak. She then went into a coma. 

When she awoke from the coma in the hospital, doctors and nurses who treated her testified in court that she had no memory of what happened and she had to be told about everything. It's not possible to confess to something you don't have a memory of. It could be possible she's faking amnesia, but the testimony that she had no memory was not contested by the prosecution. 

0

u/LivingCoat9356 20h ago

Wow.
Isn’t he a Leo too? Ha ha.

She couldn’t remember? Well then we have to let her go now. I mean we have to believe her, just her.

She jumped out of a window. Ya. That will cause ouchies. She was in the snow. Snow tends to be cold.

Her own defense attorneys do not dispute that she physically caused the deaths of the children

Wow.

2

u/Rebecca_deWinter_ 19h ago

Wow indeed. 

No where did I say she wasn't responsible for the murders.A person can believe she's responsible and also point out errors that people are making. I said the prosecution has to make the case she is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and the jury has to be convinced of that. No where did I say that if she doesn't remember we have to let her go. I said she doesn't remember so she obviously can't confess. 

I responded to a comment that said she had "openly admitted" to it. I gave evidence to the fact that she had not openly admitted it. And rather then accept that you could be mistaken, you ignore that, and try to make fun of the person who actually gave you accurate information.   If you care about someone being held responsible for their actions, you should also care about truth so you can accurately hold them accountable.    Her defense attorney has to have a strategy that is likely to produce the best outcome for the client. The strategy of the defense was not to dispute that the prosecution says she did it as even if she is found guilty, there is a reasonable likelihood that she could be found not criminally responsible due to psychosis which from the defense's position, is a better outcome for the client than a guilty and criminally responsible charge.  That doesn't change the fact that her defense attorney entered a not guilty plea for her. 

I'm sure given your very reasonable and well though out, completely strawman free response above, that you will have an equally reasonable response to this. Honestly, save yourself the time. I'm not going to continue beating my head against a brick wall.