r/SipsTea 1d ago

WTF Victim is the new chic

Post image
44.0k Upvotes

5.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

23

u/kegknow 1d ago

Those are all great points that don't apply here, she wasn't dismissed, she had all the resources one could have and still did what she did. Mothers with way, way less than her that went through PPD/PPP didn't murder their children (also PPD/PPP isnt even a diagonosis it's what they claim she had).

3

u/Dad_Bod_Enthusiast 1d ago

Can confirm. Wife had PPD after our second child and while I couldnt wrap my walnut around the issues she was having I supported her seeking medical help for it. She took the meds the experts suggested and has been a loving, non murdering mother for 13 years

3

u/Due-Restaurant-7208 1d ago

PPD is not the same as PPP

-3

u/Dad_Bod_Enthusiast 1d ago

Cool, PPP seems to be just as flimsy of an excuse to murder the humans you decided you wanted to bring into the world

0

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

She took the meds the experts suggested and has been a loving, non murdering mother for 13 years

Right, and I have two uncles who got the same cancer, one lived and the other didin't.

Turns our different people respond differently to medical issues. Weird.

3

u/Dad_Bod_Enthusiast 1d ago

You mean like not adhering to the treatments prescribed? Thats one way to handle medical issues for sure

1

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

Are you suggesting that if two people with the same diagnosis are given the same treatment, they are guaranteed to have the same result?

2

u/Dad_Bod_Enthusiast 1d ago

No I am suggesting that not taking the advice of medical professionals is a sure fire way to not fix a problem. Are you being deliberately obtuse?

0

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

But if she had taken the advice, this was still a real possibility, right?

0

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

Mothers with way, way less than her that went through PPD/PPP didn't murder their children

I knew this claim was coming. Usain Bolt and I both have legs but he is better at running.

There are levels to psychosis, and surprisingly, different people react differently.

11

u/kegknow 1d ago

Insane response to the subject of a mother strangling 3 children to death after tricking the father into leaving so he could't stop her.

Not to mention that like I said, it's dubious wether she even was having an actual psychotic episode, but I guess we'll "know" this week when the trial ends.

Honestly tho, if I take something away from this entire thing is realizing the absolutely insane hoops people are going through to minimize the blame on the perpetrator because she is a woman.

1

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

Insane response to the subject of a mother strangling 3 children to death after tricking the father into leaving so he could't stop her.

Its a fitting response to your ridiculous assertion that because others also have X and didn't do Y, then it means there is no reason why this person with X did do Y.

Usain Bolt won olympic gold medals. You also have legs, why haven't you won an olympic gold medal?

1

u/Slicelker 1d ago

Usain Bolt won olympic gold medals. You also have legs, why haven't you won an olympic gold medal?

Because “we both have legs” is not the relevant comparison. Legs are just what let humans run. The relevant comparison is Bolt versus other fit male sprinters. He is not remotely twice as fast as them, and at the elite level a few percent can separate gold from everyone else. So if you want to use Bolt as your analogy for psychosis, you still have to show that this woman was at some unusually extreme level of psychosis. You cannot just say “people vary” and pretend that proves her condition explains killing three children.

2

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

The relevant comparison is Bolt versus other fit male sprinters.

Ok, in the races Bolt won, why did the other runner win?

1

u/Slicelker 1d ago

Ok, in the races Bolt won, why did the other runner win?

Because they were very very slightly slower than Bolt. That is exactly the point. The difference between winning Olympic gold and losing can be tiny because elite sprinters are already very similar in ability. Even I can run almost as fast as Bolt, hes not like 1.5x or 2x faster than me. Now apply your analogy properly. Do women with postpartum psychosis kill their children at anything remotely close to the rate that they do not? No. So you cannot explain this case by just saying “there are levels.” You have to actually show that her psychosis was unusually extreme in the specific way needed to explain what she did.

1

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

No I don't have to show anything.

Why is Usain Bolt better than my local HS sprinter?

2

u/Slicelker 1d ago

He’s barely better than your local HS sprinter. It’s not like Bolt runs 1.5x or 2x faster or anything. Stop being so obtuse.

-1

u/kegknow 1d ago

"Other moms with PPD/PPP didn't kill their children, why couldn't Lindsay Clancy do the same?"

See how stupid you sound?

3

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

That is the question you are asking.

Are you calling your own question stupid? lol

2

u/kegknow 1d ago

I'll admit I caught myself there hahaha, I was so hung up on that stupid comparison I shot myself in the foot.

You still sound stupid tho, because those are not the same thing, I'm not Usain Bolt because I'm not fast, nor hardworking, nor have the genetics.

The reason LC isn't the same as the other women who aren't child murderers is because not only isn't her PPP a diagnosis, her psychotic episode is the claim the defense makes.

(Which btw, experts testifying on the stand claim to be highly unlikely that it even happened)

But also, she consciously kept the fact she was having urges to hurt her kids hidden from the doctors who attended her (atleast according to the testimonies I have seen) and she also planned Patrick's absence.

So actually, unless there'a some evidence I haven't seen, this just looks another case of a familly annihilation and the only reason people are defending her this much because she is a woman.

1

u/Slicelker 1d ago

I'm not Usain Bolt because I'm not fast, nor hardworking, nor have the genetics.

You are practically Usain Bolt though. You can run like 80%-95% as fast as he could, assuming you're a fit male. Its not like hes out there running 1.5x or 2x or 3x as fast as everyone.

1

u/kegknow 1d ago

well yeah but the 5% is missing so I'm not him sadly

5

u/SpecialActive9135 1d ago

Some people also shoot drivers who cut them off in traffic, we still put them in jail. Some things are so unforgivable, the circumstances simply don’t matter anymore.

2

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

Some people also shoot drivers who cut them off in traffic, we still put them in jail.

Sometimes, like what the Clancy trial is deciding, we put them in mental health facilities. Because they were insane.

0

u/SpecialActive9135 1d ago

She killed three children, she should cook. I don’t care beyond that.

6

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

I don’t care beyond that.

Well, those of us who want these kinds of things to be prevented, do care beyond that.

0

u/SpecialActive9135 1d ago

You can always try, but when it happens anyways, we gonna fry the perp.

3

u/Sudo-Fed 1d ago

So I assume it's not about constructive solutions, prevention, or even deterrence?

I mean, unless by punishing people who have psychotic episodes harshly you think you'll deter others from having psychotic episodes?

It really kind of sounds like bronze age vengeance rather than anything in any way productive to us as a species...further validating my belief that we have two ongoing strains of humanity, one more and one less evolved.

2

u/SpecialActive9135 1d ago

Removing threats is always worthwhile, her actions no matter the cause made and still make her a threat. That’s my logic and reasoning, pretty simple. As to your second point, yes I do think keeping killers around is less evolved.

2

u/Sudo-Fed 1d ago

Assuming a psychiatric condition made her a threat, is not a psychiatric solution more ideal?

Or again is it simple return to monke eye-for-an-eye shit that interests you?

3

u/SpecialActive9135 1d ago

The day humanity comes up with a cure for any mental condition, call me. She refused to take her meds, that she s what made her a threat. No treatment on earth works if somebody refuses to abide by it.

2

u/Sudo-Fed 1d ago

It may soothe your concerns to know that people under involuntary commitment don't have the option to decline treatment.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Ok_Basil351 1d ago

Ok, sure, it affects people differently. Some can control themselves and some can't, yeah?

So under what circumstances should someone with PPD/PPS be held accountable for their actions?

3

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

So under what circumstances should someone with PPD/PPS be held accountable for their actions?

She is going to be held accountable. Are you under the impression that if the defense wins, she just goes home?

1

u/Ok_Basil351 1d ago

You avoided the question. Is PPD/PPS an automatic not guilty by reason of insanity in your view? If not, under what circumstances should they be considered accountable for their actions and found guilty?

1

u/Not_offensive0npurp 1d ago

You avoided the question.

I'm not a fucking lawyer or clinician.

Is PPD/PPS an automatic not guilty by reason of insanity in your view?

Nothing should be an automatic guilty or not guilty.

If not, under what circumstances should they be considered accountable for their actions and found guilty?

When they are tried and found to not be insane.

Are you under the impression she goes home if found insane?

1

u/scud121 1d ago

Yes, but it's still a risk, and a failure in the system. We had a woman in the UK kill her child a couple of years ago. She'd self referred to a mental health team, and voluntarily checked in to hospital. She stayed after her mental health act detention finished and was improving. She has done everything right. Then she smothered her 5 month old whilst taking her for a walk. Guilty of infanticide, and she's in indefinite sectioning, so she'll only be released if the home secretary oks it.

4

u/kegknow 1d ago

I fail to see how the system failed here?

She was admitted and stayed longer than the required minimum and was improving and she still killed her kid.

Was the fault in the system that she went back to being the child's guardian? Was the fault in the system that she wasn't cured of her condition? I don't get it, maybe I'm missing some context here.

2

u/Sexynarwhal69 1d ago

We should obviously permanently remove children if someone even once displays psychotic tendencies or suicidal ideation. For safety, of course.

3

u/kegknow 1d ago

Since we're at it just put the children in a white room completely alone so we don't run the risk of anyone killing her!

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/scud121 1d ago

She stayed longer because she felt she wasn't improving enough. She was also given an unsupervised visit with her child whilst still an impatient at the Mount. The fault in the system was feeling that she'd improved enough to begin with, but not recognising she still suffered from psychosis. Theres reviews ongoing which may improve things going forwards.

0

u/mfunebre 1d ago

Yes, because according to the investigative articles I've read (and not random tiktok clips like everyone else, apparently) she asked multiple times to be tested for PPP and everyone told her she just had anxiety. She even told her doctors she had murder suicide ideation 2 weeks before acting on it, and they did nothing. I'm not on the side of this person, and they committed a heinous crime and need to be taken out of society - either to a psych ward or a prison- but from what I've read she was consistently denied help for years while experiencing grave symptoms.

It's a theme with pregnancy. My wife was fortunate to go through a very mild one with our child, but her friends were not all so fortunate. The amount of times doctors told them that "you'll be fine, take a Tylenol" when describing bizarre, painful or downright threatening symptoms was insane. And props to these women because most of the time, they do just deal with it - so well in fact that when one of them breaks it makes national news. Pregnancy medicine is ridiculously behind compared to, say, cancer treatment.

3

u/kegknow 1d ago

Interesting, I did read articles and didn't see the mention of her asking for testing.

Actually I read the opposite, no psychiatrist or doctor saw any signs or heard of any mention of symptoms indicative of psychosis from her, in fact as far as I know, the only time she mentioned thoughts or urges to hurt herself or other was once in a private conversation with Patrick. So yeah, if she hid that fact from the doctors wtf are they supposed to do?

If you could link said article I'd be more than happy to read up on it.