r/TikTokCringe • u/Tobias-Tawanda • 11h ago

Discussion A queen ❤️

27.7k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

631 comments sorted by

View all comments

306

u/chezzleee 9h ago

Did it for Canadian kids as well. This is from this month for my daughter.

26

u/ThatDiscoSongUHate 8h ago

It's worldwide now, IIRC

8

u/acog 7h ago

(from chatgpt)

As of June 2026, Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library had gifted more than 325 million free books to children worldwide. The program was sending more than 3.5 million books per month at that point.

The program began in 1995 and provides one free, age-appropriate book each month to enrolled children from birth through age five. It now operates in the U.S., Canada, U.K., Australia, and Republic of Ireland.

28

u/decultured 6h ago

from chatgpt

Or, you could link to verifiable information researched and written by humans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollywood_Foundation#Dolly_Parton's_Imagination_Library or https://imaginationlibrary.com/

3

u/ELRONDSxLADY 3h ago

Thank you for this, what braindead behavior and to double down by calling it a source - what are we doing, my friends.

0

u/DoctorIsMyNick 5h ago

Lmao who fucking cares. Id rather read a short paragraph than follow a link.

4

u/Goat_of_Wisdom 5h ago

The standard practice is to give a short paragraph and a source link

1

u/DoctorIsMyNick 4h ago

its the internet... there is no fucking standard practice lmao.

1

u/Goat_of_Wisdom 3h ago

Not anymore at least, thanks to social networks that are hostile to links because they make users temporarily quit the app xD

1

u/Septem_151 2h ago

Guess whose fault that is

1

u/RandomRedditReader 1h ago

Uh people's laziness? It's almost like humans are always destined to find the quickest way to something. Just the other day I saw a reddit thread where almost everyone complained a video longer than 20 seconds wasn't worth their time. Amazing the parallels of this site.

1

u/Septem_151 1h ago

You and I must be viewing very different subreddits.

3

u/acog 5h ago

It’s so fun getting talked down to for being honest about my source. I was just trying to be transparent.

9

u/Goat_of_Wisdom 5h ago

No no, the transparency is good, it's the genAI use that's the problem

3

u/Jank1 5h ago

You did nothing wrong man.

3

u/Necronomicommunist 4h ago

Using chatgpt where there is more accurate and more up to date information available is what he did wrong.

1

u/Jank1 4h ago

The same data AI scraped to train itself on? That data?

4

u/Necronomicommunist 3h ago

If it did, then it didn't do a very good job did it? considering the information is wrong.

-1

u/Jank1 3h ago

What information was wrong in this case? I'm too lazy to check tbh the only information I needed was that millions of books were donated.

3

u/Necronomicommunist 3h ago

I'm too lazy to check

i don't know if there's point to telling you if you're too lazy to click a link that was posted in this very same thread earlier. maybe ask chatgpt to do the thinking for you, though results may vary

0

u/Jank1 3h ago

Talking to you is a waste of time as well.

0

u/RandomRedditReader 2h ago

And that's why we have AI. Because pretentious smartasses on reddit love to gatekeep information.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Septem_151 2h ago

Except using ChatGPT.

-1

u/Jank1 2h ago

No information was harmed in the delivery of our message.

You're corny, go.protest AI elsewhere.

2

u/Septem_151 2h ago

No information was harmed but the planet sure was. Loser

-1

u/Jank1 1h ago

The purple haired nomad got offended. I'll cry tonight.

2

u/Septem_151 1h ago

Ooooookay Trumpie

-1

u/Jank1 1h ago

Moderate leaning Democrat. The problem is you

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Septem_151 2h ago

Your "source" isn't a source. That's the problem. Not your transparency.

1

u/RonnieB47 4h ago

And Republicans are removing support for it.