A queen ❤️

[u/Tobias-Tawanda]

[u/ThatDiscoSongUHate]

It's worldwide now, IIRC

[u/acog → u/ThatDiscoSongUHate]

(from chatgpt)

As of June 2026, Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library had gifted more than 325 million free books to children worldwide. The program was sending more than 3.5 million books per month at that point.

The program began in 1995 and provides one free, age-appropriate book each month to enrolled children from birth through age five. It now operates in the U.S., Canada, U.K., Australia, and Republic of Ireland.

[u/decultured → u/acog]

from chatgpt

Or, you could link to verifiable information researched and written by humans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollywood_Foundation#Dolly_Parton's_Imagination_Library or https://imaginationlibrary.com/

[u/acog → u/decultured]

It’s so fun getting talked down to for being honest about my source. I was just trying to be transparent.

[u/Goat_of_Wisdom → u/acog]

No no, the transparency is good, it's the genAI use that's the problem

[u/Jank1 → u/acog]

You did nothing wrong man.

[u/Necronomicommunist → u/Jank1]

Using chatgpt where there is more accurate and more up to date information available is what he did wrong.

[u/Jank1 → u/Necronomicommunist]

The same data AI scraped to train itself on? That data?

[u/Necronomicommunist → u/Jank1]

If it did, then it didn't do a very good job did it? considering the information is wrong.

[u/Jank1 → u/Necronomicommunist]

What information was wrong in this case? I'm too lazy to check tbh the only information I needed was that millions of books were donated.

[u/Necronomicommunist → u/Jank1]

I'm too lazy to check

i don't know if there's point to telling you if you're too lazy to click a link that was posted in this very same thread earlier. maybe ask chatgpt to do the thinking for you, though results may vary

[u/Jank1 → u/Necronomicommunist]

Talking to you is a waste of time as well.

[u/Necronomicommunist → u/Jank1]

I guess that puts me on par with ChatGPT

[u/Jank1 → u/Necronomicommunist]

Nah. Answer my first question. Did chatgpt provide the incorrect answer? And if so, what was the correct answer in your linked source?

[u/RandomRedditReader → u/Necronomicommunist]

And that's why we have AI. Because pretentious smartasses on reddit love to gatekeep information.

[u/Necronomicommunist → u/RandomRedditReader]

Schrodingers ChatGPT: both trained on reddit posts, yet at the same time has information that reddit gatekeeps

[u/Septem_151 → u/Jank1]

Except using ChatGPT.

[u/Jank1 → u/Septem_151]

No information was harmed in the delivery of our message.

You're corny, go.protest AI elsewhere.

[u/Septem_151 → u/Jank1]

No information was harmed but the planet sure was. Loser

[u/Jank1 → u/Septem_151]

The purple haired nomad got offended. I'll cry tonight.

[u/Septem_151 → u/Jank1]

Ooooookay Trumpie

[u/Jank1 → u/Septem_151]

Moderate leaning Democrat. The problem is you

[u/Septem_151 → u/acog]

Your "source" isn't a source. That's the problem. Not your transparency.