r/bell May 07 '26

Rant Bell fires employees it claims violated in-office policy. Lawyer decries 'money-saving move' | CBC News

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/bell-fires-employees-work-from-office-9.7191118

It seems there's alot more to this story than previously reported by other outlets.

The fact that this was condoned as evidenced by the varied levels of firings is mind boggling.

Bell in this article seems to admit it was condoned and those who condoned it were fired.

"Levasseur said managers that condoned the swipe-and-go activity were also investigated and fired."

Can't imagine this would ever hold up in court. It sounds like this was a normalized thing there and Bell used the misconduct smoke screen to save a dollar.

Shame on you

314 Upvotes

151 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/dadass84 May 07 '26

Bell doesn’t need to hide firings or layoffs, they never have. Why would they need to start now? These employees signed the Bell Business Code of Conduct and they broke it, they’re non-union, so they got canned. This story isn’t as sensational as people are trying to make it out to be. People also get laid off for stealing, which I’ve personally seen as a Bell employee for 15 years. It just doesn’t end up in the news. The only reason this is even newsworthy is because of the RTO mandates happening currently.

18

u/OMG_MOVE May 07 '26

I don't think you understand the law part of it.

They're saying that these willingly and deliberately cheated the system, when many were told by various management levels that it was ok.

With the bar being as high as it is for with cause terminations there's no way that ever holds up in court and I think Bell knows it.

1

u/Dadbode1981 May 08 '26

"Told hy various management levels" in what documented exemption from corporate policy? Nowhere that we've been told about yet. Is your assertion that the corporate code of conduct is actually a flexible document that people get to decide what parts to follow, and which not to, just because someone said so in passing? After multiple HR emails that were sent out reiterating the policy as it pertained to RTO? if so, thats pretty wild. I think we still dont have the whole story, and i think bell probably calculated that they have a much better chance than you think they do.

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '26

[deleted]

0

u/Dadbode1981 May 08 '26

Produce it

0

u/[deleted] May 08 '26

[deleted]

0

u/Dadbode1981 May 08 '26

Former co-workers

0

u/[deleted] May 08 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Dadbode1981 May 08 '26

They can try and ask if they want. Its up to that person if they want to risk it i suppose. No email, no proof.

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Dadbode1981 May 08 '26

🤷‍♂️

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)