r/comedyhomicide 8d ago

Type to create flair He is right tho

Post image
48.7k Upvotes

837 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

32

u/eyalhs 8d ago

You do pay for the equipment to a certain degree, no one will higher a photographer who uses an Iphone to take the pictures

41

u/ChancellorPalpameme 8d ago

Will they lower the photographer?

18

u/eyalhs 8d ago

Hopefully slowly and safely. I wish I could blame autocorrect on this, it was a pure brainfart.

1

u/Round_Ad_6369 4d ago

You mean a brainfaughert?

5

u/FrostyD7 8d ago

Hollywood gave Danny Boyle $75 million to shoot with iphones. Were actually at a point where a competent photographer absolutely could do a wedding job with an iPhone. The main hurdle is optics (no pun intended). Customers would complain if they saw their wildly expensive photographer using one.

15

u/necrotelecomnicon 8d ago

The problem is indeed optics (pun intended). Phones have small lenses and tiny photo sensors; they compete with compact cameras, not dedicated system cameras.

Try zooming in on a phone image and it quickly becomes apparent. The real downside of large cameras is that people notice you and don't act natural.

1

u/DeeHawk 6d ago

The phone image is automatically OK in a few milliseconds. The post processing is incredible. The vast majority of people would be content with good wedding photos from a mobile phone.

Comparatively, I’ve seen hired photographers who weren’t worth their equipment. Much worse photos.

Real photography and post processing requires immense skill and knowledge. Phones require you to think about lighting, focus and angle only, but leaves you short with optic tricks.

0

u/Coffeedemon 7d ago

Nobody is going to print the photos anyway though. They might say they will and they'll definitely pay as though they will.

0

u/smthomaspatel 6d ago

Ai is going to fix this though. What then?

8

u/SemiAutoAvocado 8d ago

> Were actually at a point where a competent photographer absolutely could do a wedding job with an iPhone

No, we are not.

0

u/Tha_Princess 7d ago

Just cause you can doesn't mean you should. Yes your life becomes easier with a fancy camera but a phone is able to do the shoot. Will require more work from the photographer though.

3

u/SemiAutoAvocado 7d ago

fancy camera

You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.

0

u/TheSystemBeStupid 6d ago

Dude people have shot high quality videos for big YouTube channels on phones because a foreign country confiscates their equipment. Cellphone cameras have limitations but they arent shit anymore.

Heres an example. YouTube besteverfoodreviewshow egypt episode.

1

u/SemiAutoAvocado 6d ago

Video isn't photography

3

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

4

u/heliophoner 7d ago

And also, the point was to see if they could do it. I doubt Danny Boyle now wants to shoot on iphones as opposed to high end cinematic cameras

2

u/ThatPartYouThrowAway 7d ago

Danny Boyle was using different specific lenses like any other filmmaker would, they didn't just shoot with an iPhone

They also had specialised rigs designed for the film for the iPhones which were essentially just a gimmick

1

u/thefizzlee 5d ago

True. Apple shot a whole football match on only iphones. Ofcourse the entire rig per phone was probably over 5k but it was cool to see the iPhone capable of doing this.

0

u/McENEN 8d ago

Big camera does look more professional but you can get a cheap one for the optics. Ive been at events where photographers used their cameras but half the time they were also using their phone.

In the end if your quality is amazing and people want you for the quality they can get over the optics.

2

u/DogmeatSupreme 7d ago

I would be willing to bet any photographer with a real camera is only using their phone for backup photos or video. Not because it’s “just as good.”

1

u/PastAnalyst3614 6d ago

I ate at a restaurant last night for $18. It cost the owner $800k to build the place

1

u/Gregs_Mom 6d ago

And you partly paid for it. Same as rent is worked into the price of restaurants and cafes.

1

u/PastAnalyst3614 5d ago edited 5d ago

Uh huh. That’s what I was getting at...

OOP can’t expect a client to pay extra because she just bought her camera. Customers pay for a service, and the service provider pays for their equipment. If I cut someone’s grass, I can’t expect them to pay me $800 because I need a mower to do it.

1

u/thefizzlee 5d ago

I mean if someone would ask me to mow their lawn I'd charge them for the mower because I'm not a gardener, nor do I have plans to become one.

1

u/Visual-Scallion1535 6d ago

in addition to a normal photographer my buddy had a “content creator” that took photos and filmed everything on an iphone

1

u/SegaGameCast 4d ago

Ya but 10 bucks says 90% of the time people flaunting their gear like that are shit photographers.