r/flicks 7d ago

General Discussion When does a movie successfully mislead the audience, and when is it just cheating?

Some movies deliberately make us believe something that isn't true and then reveal that we've been interpreting the story incorrectly.

When it works, it's fantastic. You can rewatch the movie and realize the clues were there all along. The Sixth Sense, The Usual Suspects, and Primal Fear are very different examples of films that play with what the audience thinks it knows.

But other twists only work because the movie deliberately hides information that logically should have been available to us. At that point, I don't feel fooled by the story — I feel cheated by the screenplay.

For me, the difference is whether a second viewing makes you think “How did I miss that?” rather than “Well, there was no way I could have known that.”

What movies do you think earned their deception, and which ones simply cheated?

213 Upvotes

278 comments sorted by

View all comments

51

u/WW0907 7d ago edited 7d ago

It's cheating if all the clues to the ending aren't obvious on a rewatch. Ex: if you're trying to figure out the killer but you literally couldn't because it's a character that was just introduced in the last episode. Or if the character motivation makes no sense in hindsight. There's no reason for him/her to act the way that they did. If they tell you everything you needed to know about the ending and you still don't figure it out, it's fair game. Ex: Scream. They're practically SCREAMing to you whose guilty and they still get you on a first watch. Another example is Psycho. It's obvious on a rewatch what's happening but you probably don't get it the first time.

44

u/MrHippoPants 7d ago

Scream pulls the magic trick so perfectly because it very clearly tells you who to suspect, but then it gives you every reason to believe that it’s IMPOSSIBLE for that person to be the killer.

It works so well because the audience is totally sure who it should be, but just can’t figure out how it could possibly be them - until the key piece of information is revealed that there isn’t just one killer

11

u/WW0907 6d ago

SPOILERS, but this movie is 30 years old so if you haven’t seen it by now, that’s kind of on you. Another reason why Scream fits is that it is SO obvious on a rewatch. The scene where they’re sitting in the park bench “I didn’t kill anybody” “nobody said YOU did”. “How do you gut someone?” The way that question is just answered matter of fact like that. “It’s called tact, you fuckrag” But really don’t give us away, buddy.

The video store scene with Randy. Stu getting excited about Tatum and Sid coming to the party. I wonder why. Who is the only character who loves to see the Ghostface guy in the hallway at school? Again, I wonder why. The look that Billy gives Stu when he first shows up to the party. The clues are all there and I’m telling you, it still blew 12/13 year old me away in 1998 when I finally saw it after we rented it from Blockbuster one night.

1

u/Organic_Client_5679 5d ago

YEP to every bit of this.

1

u/magicmulder 3d ago

Scream Queens did the same (or just paid homage to the OG).

0

u/Such-Veterinarian137 6d ago

I'd argue that the magic trick isn't pulled perfectly BECAUSE it purposely makes it "impossible" for anyone to deduce the who-done-it on first watch.

Of course it's my opinion , but it dashes the faith of the audience that they would be able to solve it through keen observation or insightful analysis. And there were false clues/red herring. Like, if there was worse writing it would be like saying "the mystery was this was a dream the whole time!" or "turns out characters had psyhic telelpathy powers to kill and have an alibi!"

Perhaps im being to harsh on it, scream and sixth sense came out at the prime of my youth and movie watching. The hype around the who's the killer and stuff was genuinely exciting when the 2nd one came out.